COVID-19 AS WAR

[rachel]

Interesting section talking about Pentagon controlled the COVID-19. All laid out in 2013.

[rachel]

2016 Obama-Era Cures Act:

“Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards.”

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-con ... se-bill/34

[rachel]

Worth a read...

Intent to Harm
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/in ... um=reader2

Congressional amendments to the 1938 FD&C Act and the 1944 PHS Act over decades had eliminated federal regulatory standards for production and use of products designated by the FDA for “emergency use” during an HHS-declared, HHS-maintained “public health emergency.”

Specifically, 21 USC 360bbb-3(c) "Criteria for Issuance of Authorization": the law provides that the HHS Secretary may issue emergency use authorizations if he/she concludes:

• that, based on the totality of scientific evidence available to the Secretary, including data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that—

• (A) the product may be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing—

• (i) such disease or condition; or

• (ii) a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product authorized under this section, approved or cleared under this chapter, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], for diagnosing, treating, or preventing such a disease or condition caused by such an agent; and

• (B) the known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat such disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product, taking into consideration the material threat posed by the agent or agents identified in a declaration under subsection (b)(1)(D), if applicable;

Note that the authority issuing emergency use authorizations is the HHS Secretary him/herself. There is also no applicable regulatory standard for issuing it other than the sole discretion of the HHS Secretary to make the determination of “may-be” efficacy. The scientific evidence does not need to be available to support this decision, and there are no hard scientific standards for assessing risks or benefits, “potential” is a sufficient standard here. There are also no stopping criteria or any process that would update/amend the decision of the HHS Secretary if and when new scientific data becomes available. What happens if more rigorous scientific data, for example larger datasets, collected over longer period become available and the findings contradict the decision made by the HHS Secretary based on small, hastily collected ones? There is no legal process defined to revise those decisions.

Of particular interest is a special category of products designated by the Department of Defense (DOD) as “prototype countermeasures”.

• 10 USC 4022(a)(1) - “[T]he Director of [] (DARPA), the Secretary of a military department, or any other official designated by the Secretary of Defense may, under the authority of section 4021 of this title, carry out prototype projects that are directly relevant to enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the armed forces.”

The language above is a lot of words that do not describe anything specific. These are simply “things that DOD needs”. You don’t need to know what they are. Because you already know what they are – they are weapons. Those are the things the DOD needs most of the time.

Final Piece of Legal Puzzle:

21 USC 360bbb-3(k): use of EUA-covered medical countermeasure (MCM) products, once designated as such by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (March 10, 2020, retroactive to February 4, 2020) “shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.” 21 USC 360bbb-3(k). EUA law, adopted 1997 and amended 2003, 2004, 2005, 2013, 2017.

Countermeasures are legally NOT pharmaceutical products.

The FDA has no authority over them and cannot enforce any regulations. They only pretend that they do. This answers the question WHY the regulators are acting this way. They are acting. As in “theater acting”. ...

[rachel]

And this from the above document about Jesuit Theatre...

...Finally, the product is not serialized – i.e. unit doses are not barcoded and thus not traceable under normal pharmaceutical distribution rules which exist to flag any safety or quality issue in the supply chain. The product this is wide open to both falsification and adulteration. The product is shipped to DOD and handled through a “black box” DOD distribution system, ostensibly due to the cold chain storage requirements. The product is deemed “US Government property” until it is injected into a person. All persons performing any tasks along manufacturing, supply chain, distribution and administration of the shots are “covered persons” under PREP Act and are fully shielded from any liability as long as they follow orders. Regardless of place of employment, they are deemed US Government employees for purposes of this work. Furthermore, the DOD contracts describe these as “civil and military application”. Here is the PREP Act clause from the Moderna contract. All DOD/HHS contracts have this clause:

Independent testing of the vials for verification of the product conformity to label is prohibited. In the US the vials are “US government property”, and ex-US the purchasing contracts prohibit vial testing on importation explicitly.

The conclusion that emerges from these facts is that the regulatory development, clinical trials, review, and approval of data in relation to the “prototype countermeasures” is a sham, a farce, a theatrical performance designed to build a false sense of trust and thus fool the public into injecting themselves with “prototypes” that lack disclosure or any way to assure safety, efficacy, conformity, purity, consistency and other characteristics expected of medical products.

The legal facts that any use of EUA covered medical countermeasures under PHE is not a clinical investigation were known to Pfizer executives who signed the July 2020 contracts, and also known to DOD/ATI and HHS officials signing those contracts. However, all these parties, including the FDA officials proceeded playing their role by pretend- "authorizing" the products.

Those legal facts were not known to the audience for the performance - the investigators, subjects and world public who were told that these were authentic clinical investigations and that the results were showing the products to be "safe and effective." The public in the US and worldwide was deceived by this sham theatrical performance.

[rachel]

I think this is where all the above information comes from...

INTENT TO HARM - EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MASS MURDER BY THE US DOD, HHS, PHARMA CARTEL


Team Enigma: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/teamenigma/

[rachel]

The previous video is worth a watch.
This is something different from Bob Cartoons, that people he talks to don't even know there is censorship going on.

[rachel]

This is the full audio session from last post, it's four hours, but having listened to the first 30 minutes, sounds interesting. Cannot download from twitter, so I've uploaded fakeotube.

New Year Reunion꞉ Censorship killed millions. Free Speech saves lives
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1YqKDoVRaDoxV

[rachel]

WAR ON US:



FULL EXTRACT:

Pentagon Ran the Vaccine Roll-out - The 'Vaccine Roll-Out' Debacle - UK Column News

New documents reveal the real reason why our governments threw caution to the wind when it came to the disastrous vaccine roll-out – because it was a military operation from the start.

[rachel]

WAR ON US:

"OUR SHOT"

[Marfer]

The previous video is worth a watch.
This is something different from Bob Cartoons, that people he talks to don't even know there is censorship going on.

Thanks - the only slight issue I have with Bob Moran is that he works for the democracy fund that is owned by Pierre Morad Omidyar - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Omidyar founder of eBay - The service was originally one of several items on Omidyar's website eBay.com. His website also had a section devoted to the Ebola virus, among other topics.[21][22]

Omidyar, a Buddhist follower of the Dalai Lama[45] who in 2010 joined Bill Gates and Warren Buffett as a signatory of The Giving Pledge, has declared his intention to give away most of his wealth during his lifetime.[46] In 2019, he donated approximately $500 million to charitable causes.[47].

https://pressgazette.co.uk/publishers/d ... anisation/

Pierre Omidyar and George Soros foundations give $500,000 to UK fact-checking organisation

A very tangled web.