...On December 11, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for administration in individuals 16 years of age and older by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
On May 10, 2021, the FDA expanded the EUA for the use of the shots to include adolescents 12 through 15 years of age.
On June 17, 2022, the FDA authorized emergency use of the mRNA Covid vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech to include use in children down to 6 months of age.
Just over a year on, the report – which was quietly released by CDC and subsequently suppressed by the mainstream media – revealed that nearly half a million children and young adults have now died since the injections were approved for use on most children.
Over 118,000 of those deaths are suspected to be linked to the Covid vaccines’ side effects.
Despite the staggering death toll revealed in the report, it has been met with deafening silence from the mainstream media...
And earlier report from end of 2022.
CDC quietly confirms at least 118k Children & Young Adults have ‘Died Suddenly’ in the USA since the roll-out of the COVID Vaccines
BY THE EXPOSÉ ON NOVEMBER 30, 2022
Official figures quietly published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) confirm nearly half a million children and young adults have died ever since the Food & Drug Administration first granted emergency use authorisation to a Covid-19 vaccine in the USA.
This has sadly resulted in nearly 118,000 excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019 average.
The figures also reveal that there have been 7,680 more excess deaths among children and young adults in 2022 so far compared to the same time frame in 2020 at the height of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.
But the year 2021 was by and large the worst year for deaths among 0 to 44-year-olds, with 291,461 excess deaths in total, nearly 60,000 more than occurred in 2020. And according to the official CDC figures, this was mainly due to a mysterious sudden rise in deaths among children and young adults from around week 31 onwards.
Unfortunately, according to data published by the UK Government, that “mysterious” sudden rise which has contributed to half a million American children and young adults dying since late 2020, is most likely due to the Covid-19 injections...
Check out this video from UNICEF using children to brainwash the masses into believing the plandemic won't end until everyone in the world is jabbed. It is also 'interesting' that they use 2025, as that is the year when SPARS aka prions disease is 'supposed' to begin taking its victims. SPARS 2025-2028 is all of their devious excercises together that parallels the timeline we are currently in.
If you look at the official information sheets for the Pfizer Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccine, you'll find no original data on how it was assessed for safety and efficacy. Instead, you find this curious statement:
"The safety of Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 is inferred from safety data of the prior Comirnaty vaccines."
Its safety is inferred.
It means they don't have any specific data about the safety of this new product at all. They are explicit about that because they go on to use trial data from a different product to infer the safety of this new one. The previous vaccine had different mRNA inside of it, and it coded for a different spike protein, and its manufacturing process and quality may have changed. Has this been thoroughly tested and investigated?
It's the same. The efficacy of the new product is being inferred from the prior vaccine.
For medical professionals, is it normal to use a new product, with a new target, new mRNA, and to just infer safety from a different product?
I thought I must have missed a beat, but http://claude.ai agreed:
"Based on the summary of product characteristics, it appears that the safety and efficacy of the Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine has been inferred primarily from data on the previous Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccines, rather than new clinical trial data specifically on the XBB.1.5 version.
The key points are:
- There are no new clinical trials presented for the XBB.1.5 vaccine itself.
- The safety section refers to safety data from the prior Comirnaty vaccines, including the original strain and BA.4/5 Omicron version. Adverse events listed are based on those previous trials.
- Efficacy data is presented for the previous vaccine versions, including in different age groups.
- Immunogenicity data suggests the new XBB.1.5 version elicits higher neutralizing antibody titers against XBB.1.5 compared to the original vaccine, but there is no clinical efficacy data presented specifically for XBB.1.5.
- The section on Omicron-adapted Comirnaty states "The safety of Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 is inferred from safety data of the prior Comirnaty vaccines."
So in summary, it appears there is no new clinical trial data presented specifically evaluating the safety and efficacy of the XBB.1.5 vaccine. The information is inferred primarily from previous clinical data on the earlier versions of the Comirnaty vaccine. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions!"
Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London: "At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.
So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.
To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now." Angus Dalgleish
