The Jobs-Federighi match, there are a number of reasons to think why the said person didn't move anywhere. At the top, Apple is a surprisingly very small team, and I got that once from an Apple employee who delivered apple product training for institutions. Also, when I was active in the industry, I used to as a matter of course watch all the Apple developer presentations as they were released. I saw Job's last and Federighi's first, and also all the strange stuff about "Job's health issues". I thought it was bizarre at the time that perhaps the last two years of his life there was a constant story about shareholders demanding to know the health status of Steve Jobs; I couldn't understand why is would be anyone's business but his and what difference it made anyway if he was sick and dying.
It's fascinating when I moved to fakeology the amount of numbers on the bullshit bingo card, Steve Jobs actually managed to cross off. I'll reiterate this, I'm beyond reasonable doubt sure Steve Jobs was a fictional character, he never lived, he never died, the identity was never a real person. He was created as a face for Apple when it first went to market, him and geeky Steve Wozniak, who we can assume is equally fictional. I'm not that interested in trying to prove Federighi is Jobs, I just know his first presentation was surprising, because it was as if Steve Jobs never existed, and certainly no one had just died. Considering up until that point apparently Steve Jobs was Apple and Apple was Steve Jobs and all the shareholders were threatening some sort of litigation if they didn't get to know if Steve Jobs had cancer or not. I'm not even kidding on that story, and suddenly silence and the guy with the hair bouncing on stage like the last ten years never happened...and you see how it feeds nicely into the 'Health app' that cannot be deleted off the Apple iPhone, which was introduced by Tim Cook directly after Job's "death".
Also, Job's was famously a very private person, no one knew anything about him until the last year of his life, when he apparently commissioned Walter Isaacson to write an official biography, that, by-the-way, was published a week after his death. He's adopted, from parents from a different country, and suddenly in his last year, found out he had a biological sister, also adopted to parents in America. Who writes this BS? Oh...Walter Isaacson.
Steve Jobs: The Exclusive Biography by Walter Isaacson – review
Guardian, Tue 25 Oct 2011
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/ ... son-review
Perhaps the funniest passage in Walter Isaacson's monumental book about Steve Jobs comes three quarters of the way through. It is 2009 and Jobs is recovering from a liver transplant and pneumonia. At one point the pulmonologist tries to put a mask over his face when he is deeply sedated. Jobs rips it off and mumbles that he hates the design and refuses to wear it. Though barely able to speak, he orders them to bring five different options for the mask so that he can pick a design he likes. Even in the depths of his hallucinations, Jobs was a control-freak and a rude sod to boot. Imagine what he was like in the pink of health. As it happens, you don't need to: every discoverable fact about how Jobs, ahem, coaxed excellence from his co-workers is here....
It say's "every discoverable fact", what I realise it means is—every agreed official fact people can use in relation to Steve Jobs going forward. If it is not in the biography it never happened, if it is, it did. That's the point of official biographies it would seem. We live in a strange fictitious world where everyone related to the media are happy to play along with the BS and not spill the beans no matter how desperate the trajectory they are taking us, and themselves. It's insane.
Did you notice the liver transplant storyline they shoehorned in to convince people they should sign-up to become organ donors...remember, organs aren't taken from dead people. And the fact that they are not clear about this shows how satanic they are. And that most Western countries have now or are in the process of switching from opt-in to opt-out. We are led by lying bastards of the highest order.
Since I've got this far...Tim Cook becomes Apple's CEO, and what do we know about him? He likes to keep fit and he's gay. See how they are trying to modify behaviour with the people they make up and pretend are real. So, because he's a health freak he introduces the 'Health' app on the iPhone....are we seeing how this all leads into Apple's COVIC-19 Exposure Notification System? Another piece of software no one wanted build straight into the IOS so it cannot be removed...
Apple's Exposure Notification System: Everything You Need to Know as the U.S. Shuts Down Support
MacRumors, Monday May 15, 2023
https://www.macrumors.com/guide/exposure-notification/
Exposure Notification started out as contact tracing, an Apple-Google initiative that was announced in early April 2020 to limit the spread of COVID-19.
Apple and Google created an API that is designed to allow iPhones and Android smartphones to interface with one another for contact tracing purposes, so if and when you happen to be nearby someone who is later diagnosed with COVID-19, you can get a notification and take the appropriate steps to self isolate and get medical help if necessary.
Determining whether you've come into contact with someone relies on your iPhone, which, using the exposure notification API, interacts with other iPhones and Android smartphones over Bluetooth whenever you're around someone else who also owns a smartphone, exchanging anonymous identifiers.
Apple and Google developed the underlying APIs and Bluetooth functionality, but they did not develop the apps that use those APIs. Instead, the technology was incorporated into apps designed by public health authorities worldwide, which can use the tracking information to send notifications on exposure and follow up with recommended next steps. Apple and Google also implemented an "Express" feature that allows Exposure Notifications to work in partnership with health authorities, but without an Exposure Notification app.
The APIs were created with privacy and security in mind, and app usage is opt-in rather than mandatory.
...and rather than Apple Events being something that introduces new features for the user, they become all about sales announcements and advertisements to tie in Big Pharma and smart devices, let's guess, to monitor individual's carbon usage, and that magically syncs with the Energy bill that has just passed into law in the UK via the Seat of Satan, the House of Commons,...
...This is the point I stopped watching Apple events. I looked at a couple of Apple Computer review videos recently, not sure which OS, and they were touting the bringing back of chimes at startup as a feature....that basically shows two things. 1. There is seriously nothing new being introduced in Apple OS to aid the user and justify the continual updates, it's now just about locking the system down and creating an artificial redundancy cycle. 2. All the apparent independent reviewers who love Apple and create Youtube videos to tell us about the new features are actually paid to read scripts, and that's why they bother to mention the chimes, and put it in a positives light rather than make snark comments like the one i'm posting here.
