Re: ONE HEALTH - Manhattan Principles
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 6:34 pm
From the previous substack article:
...The report specifically names ‘One Health’. And this, in a document titled ‘White Paper on a GEF COVID-19 Response Strategy’. It also refers to the ‘Manhattan Principles’ which were defined in 2004. The World Bank also referred to these, so let’s have a look at what these are about.
Those can be found over here.
http://www.oneworldonehealth.org/sept20 ... ept04.html
In short, in 2004, at the Rockefeller Centre, the world’s leading global institutions met debating “One World, One Health”. One of the primary co-authors here were William B Karesh… who also works for EcoHealth Alliance. Yeah, that EcoHealth Alliance — they were partners in terms of engineering covid-19.
The very first ‘Manhattan Principle’ is this - a request that humans, and animals be considered one and the same.
Which is highly likely why they were adamant that Covid-19 came from bats. They had to sell One Health down the road, after all. In fact, the front page of the World Bank report above outlines this expressly as well — zoonotic.
Principles 3-5 outlines in brief a surveillance apparatus to ‘control and mitigate diseases’. As does principle 9.
And to re-iterate, Georgetown worked on the surveillance technology in the 2010s, while the World Bank worked with the CGD and EU to implement Digital IDs.
Principle nine furthermore considers vaccines / pharmaceuticals an area where we should further invest in global health. Principle 4 briefly mentions this as well, ‘human health programs’. Finally, principle 10 outlines the importance of centralisation (WHO), and principle 12 pushes for education on the topic.
To protect us, of course.
In the early years of the 2010s, the United Nations University - yes, they have one, though they claim it’s a think tank - released this strategy plan for the years 2011-14. Their ‘Thematic Clusters’ are in short what they focus on. Items 3 and 4 are those of significance in this regard.
Global health, food/water safety, combating illness. All apply here. Climate change, ecological health, biodiversity, sustainable land. Again, all apply to the ‘Manhattan Principles’.
Ah, but it’s a coincidence. It’s just a coincidence.
Well, in 2020 the ‘Publishers Compact’ was announced. Sustainable Development Goals, etc. It’s exactly what you expect, they all align on this - they will shove their equality, sustainability, justice in your face at every given opportunity. Does that sound like relevant to the contemporary situation?
The list of members include a great numbers of large publishing houses. Elsevier, being one. Elsevier, for one, own the Lancet, but they also founded the ‘Climate Change and Health‘ journal - in 2021...
...The report specifically names ‘One Health’. And this, in a document titled ‘White Paper on a GEF COVID-19 Response Strategy’. It also refers to the ‘Manhattan Principles’ which were defined in 2004. The World Bank also referred to these, so let’s have a look at what these are about.
Those can be found over here.
http://www.oneworldonehealth.org/sept20 ... ept04.html
In short, in 2004, at the Rockefeller Centre, the world’s leading global institutions met debating “One World, One Health”. One of the primary co-authors here were William B Karesh… who also works for EcoHealth Alliance. Yeah, that EcoHealth Alliance — they were partners in terms of engineering covid-19.
The very first ‘Manhattan Principle’ is this - a request that humans, and animals be considered one and the same.
Which is highly likely why they were adamant that Covid-19 came from bats. They had to sell One Health down the road, after all. In fact, the front page of the World Bank report above outlines this expressly as well — zoonotic.
Principles 3-5 outlines in brief a surveillance apparatus to ‘control and mitigate diseases’. As does principle 9.
And to re-iterate, Georgetown worked on the surveillance technology in the 2010s, while the World Bank worked with the CGD and EU to implement Digital IDs.
Principle nine furthermore considers vaccines / pharmaceuticals an area where we should further invest in global health. Principle 4 briefly mentions this as well, ‘human health programs’. Finally, principle 10 outlines the importance of centralisation (WHO), and principle 12 pushes for education on the topic.
To protect us, of course.
In the early years of the 2010s, the United Nations University - yes, they have one, though they claim it’s a think tank - released this strategy plan for the years 2011-14. Their ‘Thematic Clusters’ are in short what they focus on. Items 3 and 4 are those of significance in this regard.
Global health, food/water safety, combating illness. All apply here. Climate change, ecological health, biodiversity, sustainable land. Again, all apply to the ‘Manhattan Principles’.
Ah, but it’s a coincidence. It’s just a coincidence.
Well, in 2020 the ‘Publishers Compact’ was announced. Sustainable Development Goals, etc. It’s exactly what you expect, they all align on this - they will shove their equality, sustainability, justice in your face at every given opportunity. Does that sound like relevant to the contemporary situation?
The list of members include a great numbers of large publishing houses. Elsevier, being one. Elsevier, for one, own the Lancet, but they also founded the ‘Climate Change and Health‘ journal - in 2021...