coming from the "chem"trail thread
here,
but belongs here because this is not the planes part of the "what are satellite data coming from then?" question that needs to be answered if you embrace the stance of Impossibility of Space Travel. Not even the Ever part, but that is fundamental throughout.
pasterno wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:39 pm
aSHIFT. wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:44 pm
Nice, mentalversity, at least 2 observe the same phenomenon, in this case a much easier, more logical, more sensible, and financially suitable solution for this "problem" that no matter what comes up with us, the ones """denying""", (well, GAIA's Laws indeed deny any species to leave their homeland, planet, moon, exoplanet, or whatever you call it, if you believe in them) the Possibility of Space Travel.
It was for me the hardest nut to crack also, having worked with "satellite" data, which involves much more than just the to-us-all-visible parts as Google Earth/Maps/Bing/whatever photo-"satellite" data...
monitoring of weather patterns, forest fires, urbanization, oil spills, deforestation & agriculture, sooo many applications more than just photos.
Those data I think are taken by those high flying military planes, in the end the NOAA's, NASA's, USGS's, Topographic mapping agencies, all of it, just like the military, even officially belong to "The State". NASA's origins ; NACA are military anyway.
It's the military who has control over airspaces.
The satellite acquisition programmes also explain those typical criss-cross hatched patterns in the skies, that absolutely are there and no imagination, CGI or "ghost planes", they are there.
Makes total sense, satellite data comes in grid format anyway.
I have just very minor experience with ArcGIS, but that is one of the standards in mapping and using "satellite" data industry...
What for me changed was GPS; Which is a time stamp mimicking a very fast moving "satellite" which behaves perfectly according to a mathemathical model.
And when I flew over a large ocean my GPS didn't work. (huh!)
Haha
I think "GPS" is just a deceptional mathematical intermediate step controlled by the US government.
The receiver sees a time code.
There are 3 parts to the GPS signal:
- A satellite ID (called the Pseudo Random Code)
- Almanac data (orbital information for all the satellites)
- Ephemeris data (the orbital information for the single satellite in question, including the very precise clock information necessary to calculate the distance)
The funny thing is, you don't need a satellite. Just a radio transmitter can send it. You can receive it as if it was sent by a satellite.
The satellite just exists in the model. Not in the reality. That's so funny.
It's a made up pseudo reality. My expectation is that some large radio antennas globally send out the "GPS signals"
It's quite an awesome magic trick. It just exists in the data reality.
What's also awesome they never break down!
I took a look at maps, a satellite cellphone coverage at GPS. And all the same nonsense.
I'm convinced it will be the same for other "satellite" services.
Good you help us learn; aiducation, on GPS.
My own experiences are
- we did fieldwork in areas in Spain in the late 90s where there was NO cellphone network (none of the operators) yet there was GPS signal.
fake satanlights on the GPS device, that should work as you describe, but using different frequencies than the then only Mobile Phone signal, when there was no internet phone signal...
also on oceans ships need to rely on GPS data, integrated in their mapping or not
Satellite data comes in various forms, as far as I can see it now:
1 - static - satellite surveys taken by high flying planes, as described by pasterno and me in the linked thread
2 - dynamic - GPS triangulation using ionospheric rebound, also "satellite phones" use this principle - see pasterno's post quoted above
3 - continuous - TV signals - comedic if you believe the official narrative, see below
======================
the ridiculousness of beliieving "muh TV works so satellites really hang there at fixed places smack bang in the outer so-called Van Allen Belts..."
I outlined at the platform of one of those silly believers, the one who says to close up shop but apparently finds enough motivation to keep a dead blog going, Mark Tokarski
His claim
"muh TV works because the satellite installment guy pointed the center of our dish exactly at a car-sized object at 23,000 miles / 36,000 km distance...."
ok, let's look at that claim
1st question YOU should ask your satellite expert
how much does he know of astronomy
and what are the exact, but exact, else your TV won't work...
celestial coordinates of said "satellite" you claim hangs there and works all the time, without maintenance....
so
Right Ascension
Declination
just a basic 2D compass wind direction like 270 = West would be helpful
no, just "he points it south, and it works"
rrrrright
a 5 meter sized satellite receiver
23,000 miles out
is a 5 millmeter, or fruit fly sized object
23 miles out
even the little quakes a passing truck or loaded bus makes on the towers around me
should produce a (certain) loss of TV or any other dish based signal.
IF it were so specific to point to that fruitfly, 36 km far away....
but just bouncing off the ionosphere and they send the signals to the most accesible rim of Earth, the equator, again makes total sense, is the method, no
satan lights needed.