None of us should fear "Holocaust denial laws" (HDL).
Why?
Because they're not serious. They are not there to put you or me in court.
They are not like "normal" laws that are valid all over the world, each in their own particular wording, but overall the gist is the same.
be it bodily harm, theft, fraud or property damages, the laws are overall clear. Everywhere. From Greenland to Grenada, Kamchatka to Kyoto.
That is not the case with these so-caled HDLs.
0 - to start with, they are cultural. Based on the amount of jewishness in the surroundings, the laws change. Here, in 2012, we were standing below the hardcore football fans of 1 time Copa Libertadores winners Once Caldas. Their name is...
Holocausto Norte
I mean....
I have shared that famous sepia photo before in an old server. And is on my Patreon for the matrons.
so that's the start, it's depending on where you are. Meaning little in an online, international context. (((They))) play with this fear, so read on...
=====
1st - study the laws themselves, if you're into that. the actual text, what does it say - so good this thread is there for exactly that
just now searching for "that law" in the Netherlands, the country I was not even in, but bound to by the forum rules (I met more than 100 people from that forum in real life, it was my "Discord" back then), I found a discussion about updating, amending, expanding the law.
Article 137c
that is what I remembered from years ago, and the actual text is interesting (you can all use seach engines yourselves) but should be read and understood in its core language, not translated. It was written in Dutch, so should be read as such.
at the same time, doesn't matter, not even the amendment discussion, cause the nucleus doesn't change and proves its vagueness and nonsense:
"collective insulting", "insulting a collective", "being hateful to a group of people"
in my case, and that was what I outlined when I was welcomed back by so many, asking where I was the past 3 months, "I couldn't investigate the so-called mass murder on my own family", BANG, permaban.
What we do here, Fakeology, Revisionism, without any hateful motive, just properly using our brains, eyes, ears and each others lessons to gain understanding in historical events
cannot be forbidden. It cannot be made illegal, and that is why they do it the way they do it.
For those interested, in Dutch that discussion on Nederland Rechtsstaat (meaning State of Law and Nation of Justice at the same time!)
https://www.nederlandrechtsstaat.nl/ont ... ingrijpen/
1a - in Europe, within the jurisdiction of the EU legal entities, you are bound to not only national, but also European laws.
I don't remember the details or code number, but there was in the late 2000s some law passed by a French EU parliamentarian or so, and that can supercede Dutch laws, so they can hide behind 2 shifting goalpost trees, playing 4D hide and seek....
2nd - recognize they are all worded differently, and vague and not addressing the issue at hand
outlined above and see my conclusions at bottom
3rd - they DO NOT WANT you or me or anyone reasonably eloquent enough to explain their points. That is the LAST thing they want, hence why these scare tactic "laws" are in place.
But this is crucial, cause if you strangle a nurse, steal from the state (yeah, the paradox of that still needs to land with me also), defraud the schools and vandalize the airport
they absolutely DO WANT you in court
you sure are put on trial for all to see
For All To See
remember that trials, public trials, those that get to us through medias, no matter how "alternative" are there for showcasing.
They are Judge Judy shows, staged.
Their primary goal is not justice
Non-public trials, those civil lawsuits that are going on everyday, those are real and not put on TV, or "YouTube" (internet video services) (most of the time), etc.
(indeed the whole System of Laws is not set up to do justice, but elements of it surely are, else it couldn't function...)
4th - So the connection made with
"the Papal Anti-Heresy Laws"
is perfect
because they suffered the same. So it's ironic yous use it as an argument FOR the so-called "danger" of HDLs, but you should think the exact other way.
Why do you believe that "
Galileo Galilei" or any of those "historical figures"; the Neil DeGross Tysons, the Elon Musks, the Taylor Swifts of those days...
(doesn't his name alone already sound like an early 17th century Pop Star or Football Player ?? )
went through all that was taught to us
ad nauseam
in schools.
Like "there was 1 world view, the Ptolemaic geocentric Papal Right One and then there was Galileo and Kopernik and his buddies and they said heliocentrism" and then
"burned at the stake"
like the witch trials (remember Miles Mathis' Salem piece, still sloppy "genealogy" he did, but back then his articles were still quality and good insights)
that is the gist of what everyone got in schools, except I guess the jesuits cause they should know better
and thus we too
for and around Simon Shack's geo-heliocentric TYCHOS model I made quite the extensive overview with the different views of the cosmos
in those ages
and it was way way more diverse and unestablished than what our schoolbooks and "teachers" indoctrinated into us
see, of course, Fakeopedia - Celestial Models - a good read !
https://fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/inde ... ial_Models
======
so,
my view is that these HDLs are there to scare the public.
the highly publicized cases are staged, controlled, not making sense from an "innocent researcher with genuine questions stands up against the established truths" view.
the whole Holocaust
Story (extensive article
at Fakeopedia!) does not make sense so the LAST thing they want is you and me there in court
about this
so forget that, don't be afraid of (((them))). As long as you don't fall into the trap set out for you, in concluding that "jews is bad, so the damnified nazis must be good".
Cause that's where they get (to) you.
That's visible throughout all those cases
they try to tie you to the scarecrows they have created themselves
if you fall for that
like a moron
not like a Fakeologist continuing asking the same questions
"if the Nazis were so innocent and just caught in their cleansing of jewism in Europe"
then why didn't they prove that at Nuremberg and all the other minor, less publicized kangaroo courts they held in different places....