Wet Market v Lab Leak

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 4161
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 1802 times

Wet Market v Lab Leak

Unread post by rachel »

Quite obviously, people here do not subscribe to either of the alternatives, but from the point of view of the ONE HEALTH agenda, the zoonotic cause is absolutely the thing they would want to cement as fact...that's like the 2009 SWINE FLU, which did not come from pigs or any other animal. So that suggests the Lab Leak push might be from a different entity. Anyway, I've just come across this looking through a COVID related thread on another forum.

https://www.dailyveracity.com/2023/09/1 ... -on-covid/
CIA Agent Admits They Paid Scientists to Change Their Opinions on COVID
September 13, 2023

In a letter addressed to CIA Director William Burns on Tuesday, it was revealed that a high-ranking CIA officer informed leaders of a House committee that the agency attempted to offer financial incentives to six analysts. The aim was to persuade them to alter their stance on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that the virus emerged from an animal source rather than from a lab in Wuhan.

“According to the whistleblower, at the end of its review, six of the seven members of the Team believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China,” the House panel chairmen wrote.

photo_2023-09-13_09-53-48.jpg

“The seventh member of the Team, who also happened to be the most senior, was the lone officer to believe COVID-19 originated through zoonosis.”

“The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” they said.

Wenstrup and Turner also requested the production of documents and correspondences exchanged between the CIA and various federal agencies such as the State Department, FBI, Department of Health and Human Services, and the Energy Department.

The CIA Director of Public Affairs Tammy Kupperman Thorp told The NY Post “We take these allegations extremely seriously and are looking into them. We will keep our Congressional oversight committees appropriately informed.”

The allegations come at a time when several media outlets have warned that at least some COVID restrictions, like masks and vaccine mandates, may be making a comeback. According to polling, the overwhelming majority of the American public would be opposed to the return of mandates on masking.

The same week the news of the CIA whistleblower broke, a video of the current director of the CDC, Mandy Cohen, went viral. In the clip, Cohen states that she would rely on the opinions of certain friends in order to make final policy decisions on COVID restrictions.
User avatar
SaiGirl
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 9:42 pm
Location: 21075
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 204 times
Contact:

Re: Wet Market v Lab Leak - Fallback to Fiction

Unread post by SaiGirl »

The "lab leak" script was a test of the "biowarfare terror" narrative.

Bill Gates warns tens of millions could be killed by bio-terrorism
(This article is more than 7 years old)
Microsoft founder and philanthropist tells Munich security conference genetic engineering could be terrorist weapon.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... -terrorism
============================

The "lab leak" script is based on propping up the polycentric illusion of "cold war" between China and the US.
The Russians and Chinese still push this narrative, but blame it on the US.
While in the US, we're supposed to blame it on "the Wuhan lab" (China).

This article in the "Off Guardian" explains it all quite well.

==============
QUOTE
=============
It’s the mainstream narrative in different wrapping paper.

As we always told you it was.

We’ve refuted it a thousand times already. The theory is illogical based on what is already known, immaterial given the “pandemic disease” was never unusually deadly, and dangerous to endorse because it supports future lockdowns, vaccinations and God knows what else.

We fact-checked the logic of the theory in 2021:

What, exactly, is the point in a bioweapon which is no more deadly than common flu viruses? Why go to the trouble of creating a pretty much harmless virus in a lab?

Supposing you were interested in creating a pandemic, would that be a good way of doing it? Would it be worth the expense? Wouldn’t it be simpler to just make-believe there was a plague through fear-porn and statistical sleight-of-hand?

After all, an imaginary pandemic can infect whoever you want, spare whoever you like, start and stop at your convenience, obey any rules you care to make up and be cured instantly as long as everyone pays you for your “vaccine”.

[…]

[T]he lab-leak theory does serve the Deep State agenda in one fashion: it reinforces the idea that the virus is a real problem that needs to be solved, rather than a fear-based control narrative.

Fear is fear, and whether it’s of a zoonotic virus or a bioweapon, it can be used to bend a population to your will.
=================================
UNQUOTE


https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/12/off ... dangerous/
Post Reply