If we consider Andrew Bridgen's Commons debates on their own merit, we have almost every one of the 650 MPs (who were not serving Cabinet members that had to be there) not interested in hearing the details of something that has potentially killed and harmed a subsection of people who voted for them and that they are meant to represent in their constituencies. And it is not like interested parties didn't email the MPs to ask them to attend the vaccine harms debates Andrew Bridgen arranged.
We can come to the conclusion they are all a bunch of heartless bastards; else we can look for a different answer, something like, 'the thing that is being presented to us as a functioning democracy is not what it appears'. Following on from that; a logical alternative scenario is, the people actually in control hire out-of-work variety artists to sit in the Commons chambers as extras, and if they are good at following orders, then occasionally they are given scripts so they can stand up in the Commons and say things. But mainly, they are paid per appearance to stand around having their photos taken in various poses doing various things, and holding signs...don't forget the holding signs.
You might think what was the point of me posting up all of those images. Well firstly, they are all different MPs and they are all different campaigns, and that set is not exhaustive by any means, as I refrained from duplicates and putting up pictures of MPs signing things, etc. ...So firstly, how much UK taxes are burned paying people to design and print out these advertisements? Couldn't the money be better spent actually fixing problems? If these people believe in say global warming, how do they justify this waste of resources? And following on from that, what's the CO2 footprint related to these promotions, and how much waste of energy? And more pointedly, look at the campaigns they are actually supporting above, how many are related to health? If we are to believe these people really do care about the things they hold signs up about, why did none of them turn up for the Andrew Bridgen debates about vaccine harms and excess deaths?
Now go back to the answer, it's because they are actors who are paid appearance fees, and they do whatever the brief requires them to do. They don't actually receive that MP's salary that is assigned to them, and in that case Andrew Bridgen isn't getting paid to do what he is doing, but rather he, and other people behind him in the shadows, want these things minuted into the Commons Record in hopes of a time when they can be used to prosecute, and the rule of law returned.
