It's The Muppet Show!

[rachel]

Ed Miliband just wound me up with his bird massacring wind turbine push, so I feel the need to post this.

They just do his makeup differently, his nose is fake and likely the forhead.

This is what "They Live" was alluding to.

[Samson79]

Here is wondering if the likenesses are NOT double agents but simply "related" from the same hatchery, like in Brave New World, taking into consideration it is a very intricate but closed shop it wouldn't be to far fetched to think these people are closely related by common shared parentage, some share a male sperm doner while others share female egg doners, also worth a mention is if you remove all the partitions like movie stars, sport stars, or basically anything that would involve their collective system of test tube pregnation and surrogates from even further back in generation (possible with cryogenic technologies) you might see familiar physical expression accross the board, especially where one specific tv celeb has proven "liked" by the fauning public, a specific physically expressed look or trait might be noticed or echoed, so any one of these new people can always be therefore waiting in the wing, like Reagan being a former film star, or a news reader becomes a FIFA diplomat, or sports personality might become an ambassador for a political agenda, "we are all in this together" offers a clue to them ALL being related, literally, even accross different racial terms, then add to that the inversion of facial hair on the females or feminization of the males, every different outcome can be genetically shared and we would never know, but Im not sold on the double agent disguises simply because they look obviously fake, like the man in his 20s made to look 80.....they cannot get the skin to look real imho, because skin is a living organ and fluctuates so much from variables of air temps, how much oxygenated blood is available, immune responses....which is why a real person (even if inverted) never looks the same in any setting 10 mins apart, just my opinion of course, but more likely they are all loosely related, also knowing how narcissistic these people are I think some of the elite we don't see often might have multiple offspring in all different areas of culture that is televised, the possibility exists, like so many similar age to William share his physical features but might be involved in philanthropic ventures and only seen on "getty" when they all have get together under some function, often why there is always a camera seemingly to photo every hug, kiss, handshake and excited mutual gaze at eachother.....oh look their is your cousin etc....all in this together (?) After all its a club and we are not in it. They mock our lack of knowledge of ancestry, while they carefully keep theirs fully maintained privately, I think public relations has offered us many clues to this yet we never question it or take them up on their own word in telling us.

[rachel]

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

UNESCO...who'd have guessed. Oh yeah, it's the Baha'i cult's stronghold.

Melissa Fleming is Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications at the United Nations. In this role, Ms. Fleming oversees the UN’s strategic communications operations, including its multilingual news and digital media services, public outreach programmes, and global campaigns. Under her leadership, the UN Department of Global Communications engages in advocacy for a healthy information ecosystem, promoting independent media and information integrity on digital platforms.

UNESCO is hosting in Paris, UNESCO Headquarters, the “Internet for Trust” conference to discuss a set of draft global guidelines for regulating digital platforms, to improve the reliability of information and protect freedom of expression and human rights.

You mean to none stop lie to people? But hold that space, because I'll return to this later.

Dr June Raine, chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, has said it is not lowering its standards regarding a Covid vaccine.

“There is absolutely no chance that we will compromise on standards of safety or effectiveness,” she told a Downing Street coronavirus briefing today.

Again, hold that space, but of note, I can't trace her back prior to 2017, not a picture anyway. it's post Brexit vote, so she looks like she's part of the 'My actual qualification for this job is bullshit lying to the camera while pretending to be sincere.' Not finished yet though.

The Motion: This House Believes Positive Discrimination Is The Best Solution To An Unequal Society.

Katie Hopkins continues the case for the opposition, as the fourth speaker of six in the debate.

The motion was defeated with 177 noes to 98 ayes.

ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY: The Oxford Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. Since 1823, the Union has been promoting debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.

Not really arsed about the motion. I know what I see, I know what I hear.

FEB 2023: Internet for Trust: Melissa Fleming, Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications


NOV 2020: Medicines chief on Covid vaccine: ‘Safety of the public will always come first’


FEB 2016: Positive Discrimination Debate | Katie Hopkins | Opposition


I might as well throw another one in that I've already highlighted in this thread.

With the credentials of RJ Cutler and Ice Cube behind it this show should have lived up to their claims that it would be provocative and insightful.

I was less than impressed to discover that two of the Wurgel family were in ‘the business’: Bruno Wurgel, described as a teacher on the show, appears on IMDb as Bruno Marcotulli with an acting resume running from 1987 to 2002; Rose Wurgel also as an IMDb entry, as Rose Bloomfield, with a couple of entries; Carmen Wurgel a photographer’s location scout heard about the show ‘from a friend who had a friend who was working on the show’.

Anyone with a brain questions just how ‘real’ is reality TV: these casting choices were for me immensely damaging to its ‘face validity’.

As it turns out, not two, three. Carmen Wurgel on U.S. 'Black. White.' 2006. I do think it's her, but only based on the pictures, no clips of her, and of course Rishi Sunak's debut on reality tv, just like Katie Hopkins on 'The Apprentice' and just like Carmen, only she seems to no longer exist.



I think she should be locked up, not pretend locked up like her plastic friend, Alex Belfield. I mean criminally charged for misfeasance in public office.

[rachel]

https://www.lawtonslaw.co.uk/resources/ ... ic-office/

Misfeasance in public office explained (UK)
Nick Titchener

If you are found guilty of the offence of misfeasance in public office, you face a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

The offence involves a public official acting in contravention of their position of authority, resulting in harm, injury, financial loss or damage to a third party.

Nick Titchener, director and solicitor advocate at Lawtons Solicitors, discusses:

1. The definition of misfeasance in public office
2. Misfeasance and the law
3. What to do if you are accused of misfeasance in public office

What is misfeasance defined as in the UK?

A form of misconduct, misfeasance in public office occurs when a public official, public servant or public body knowingly and willingly acts in a manner with the realisation that their actions are likely to cause loss or harm to another. The action is legal, but is performed in a way that harms another.

Misfeasance is often confused with negligence, whereby an individual does not carry out their role or responsibilities with a correct level of care which results in harm to another.

Negligence generally involves harm to another as a result of carelessness, error or lack of judgement, whereas misfeasance requires a greater degree of culpability on the part of the person concerned, often when the person has intentionally committed an act that would be to the detriment of another and often where there has been an abuse of that person’s power or position of responsibility.


What is a public official?

UK law defines a public official as an individual who is in a position of authority. The individual will hold a judicial, legislative or administrative position, whether this is appointed or elected.

Examples of public officials in the UK include:

1. Members of the police force
2. Members of the armed forces
3. Government ministers
4. Local government officials
5. Civil servants
6. Prison officers
7. Security agencies including immigration and border control

Public officials are also known as public officers. Each case of alleged misfeasance must be assessed individually where public officials are involved. The nature of the officer’s role, their duties and the level of trust – directly or indirectly – placed upon them by the public will all be considered.


What is the difference between misfeasance or malfeasance in public office?

While misfeasance in public office involves a public officer knowingly acting in an unlawful manner, malfeasance is an unlawful, intentional act of misconduct. In law, malfeasance is regarded as more severe than misfeasance and nonfeasance, which is a failure to act when there is a duty to do so.


Misfeasance and the law

Those in a position of authority are obliged to use their powers for public good. If these powers are abused by the public official to the detriment of a third party, a case of misfeasance in public office may arise.

Misfeasance in the medical profession may arise if a doctor prescribed the wrong medication to a patient, or alternatively prescribed the wrong dosage of medication, which then caused harm to the patient or left a lasting impact on their health. The doctor has not deliberately set out to harm the patient, but their actions may have resulted in such.

Where there is more deliberate intent, there can naturally be an overlap with these types of offences, whereby sometimes they may amount to specific offence, such as an assault or administering a noxious substance for example.


What factors are needed for a case of misfeasance to be proven?

For a case of misfeasance to be proven and prosecuted, two factors must be present:

1. The misconduct was carried out by a public officer
2. The misconduct resulted in personal injury, financial loss or damage to your reputation

If these factors are determined, the act of misconduct will be investigated to determine:

What the public official did

1. Why they acted in such a way

For the case to be successful and for the offence of misfeasance in public office to be proven, the prosecution in the case must demonstrate that the public official:

1. Intended to cause the damage, loss or injury
2. Had no concern for the third party in respect of the damage, loss or injury

It must be proven that the public officer deliberately acted in contravention of their position of authority.

Misfeasance in public office is an indictable offence which can only be heard in the crown court.


What is the sentence for misfeasance in public office under UK law?

If found guilty of misfeasance in public office, the maximum penalty is life imprisonment, albeit the court has a wide range of discretion and much will depend on the harm caused and the position and level of responsibility exercised by the official in question.


What to do if you are accused of misfeasance in public office

If you have been accused of committing misfeasance in public office, you should seek expert legal advice as soon as you are able to do so. Expert representation is essential.

At Lawtons our specialist solicitors are experienced in defending the most complex cases. These cases are often highly sensitive and an official who is under investigation will be at risk of losing their liberty and employment, with significant damage to their reputation.

Having a legal team that can support you is vital. We will work with you to establish the facts of the case with the aim of achieving the best outcome for you, whilst minimising the potential impact on your reputation.

Call us on 0333 577 0522 to discuss the individual circumstances of your case.

He even gave you a phone number to ring, Katie.

[rachel]

This site is about fakeology and I guess tools needed to weed out fakes. What I have generally found about fake personas as public influencers is they are chameleons. In fact, sometimes we can be convinced someone has been cloned out when in fact a decision has been made to change their outward look to portray something different to what the character was originally created for. I'm going to give an example, which is only really relevant to Brits, but...

Ricky Tomlinson and Steve Rotheram

That's actor Ricky Tomlinson of soap opera 'Brookside' and sitcom 'The Royle Family' fame. and the current Liverpool Metro Mayor, Steve Rotheram. Now I can categorically tell you that Ricky Tomlinson is a fictional character, I can tell you that because I sat two rows behind him at a Labour public meeting. This was in 2016 when I thought politics mattered. He took his seat literally as the meeting was about to begin, and I was like 'what the hell is wrong with his head?' He had the stature of a thunderbird puppet, no joke, in fact he had difficulty taking his seat because his movement was impaired. It's when I saw this, it reminded me of Tomlinson trying to take his seat, and it dawned on me what was actually going on with his massive head.

Makeup Transformation - The Footy Show - Fletch and Hindy Pranking


The thing is, when you don't know what you are looking at, it's not as apparent as you think it would be, and it's rude to stare. I can guess who came up with that one. But now I know exactly what I was looking at, and why I can tell you, Ricky Tomlinson is a fictional character. But it gets more interesting when you read up on this Mr Plastic's back story.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/202 ... e-examined

Ricky Tomlinson’s criminal convictions to be re-examined
Tue 26 May 2020

The criminal convictions of actor Ricky Tomlinson, who starred in the TV comedy the Royle Family, are to be re-examined by appeal court judges after an official body suggested he may have been unjustly jailed.

Tomlinson and other trade unionists have been campaigning for years to clear their names after they were jailed during a strike in the 1970s.

On Tuesday, the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the public body that scrutinises alleged miscarriages of justice, announced it had asked the court of appeal to review the cases of Tomlinson and others.

Tomlinson, 80, said it was “good news” and an opportunity to prove that he and 23 other men – known as the Shrewsbury 24 – were prosecuted in what amounted to a politically motivated attack on the trade union movement by the government, police and managers.

He worked as a plasterer in the construction industry before becoming well-known as as an actor in films such as Raining Stones and Riff-Raff.

Tomlinson, was jailed in 1973 for two years during a strike after he was convicted of conspiring to intimidate and affray. He had taken part in the first national building workers’ strike in 1972 to improve wages and safety regimes on sites.

Months after the strike ended, 24 trade unionists were arrested and prosecuted for offences including unlawful assembly, conspiracy to intimidate, affray and threatening behaviour while picketing.

After a series of three trials at Shrewsbury crown court in Shropshire, they were convicted of sentences ranging from three years’ to three months’ imprisonment suspended for two years.

For years, campaigners under the banner of the Shrewsbury 24 Campaign have been gathering evidence seeking to clear the names of those convicted, who believed that they were persecuted in an attempt to suppress trade unionists at a time of increasing workers’ militancy.

The review body’s new decision means that it has to date asked the appeal court to re-examine the cases of 14 of those convicted, having investigated their claims: along with the six referred on Tuesday, eight had been referred in March.

I don't know the ins and outs, but look how the Guardian story is framed around the actor Tomlinson. A guy who would appear to use prosthetics to hide his true identity. I've just found a picture from the time, and it is now clear to me Tomlinson and his mate Dennis Warren were always actors; but the other 22? Where they useful tools that got caught up in a government operation? You know like most of the Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil dickheads who glue themselves to roads? Get a criminal record for what exactly, being a dupe of the state?

The Shrewsbury Two - Dennis Warren (left) and Ricky Tomlinson are pictured together in 1975

See the horizontal ridge on the nose, a fake section to change his profile.

So it's clear to me from that, Tomlinson and Warren were always actors, do we therefore think they spent any time in prison? Furthermore, might they have been agent provocateurs that actually set the other people up? I'm convinced that is absolutely what the poison persona Katie Hopkins is all about now with her secret meetings above dry cleaners. If you know what is good for you stay right away from her and anyone she associates with, because they will have you banged up in prison when they spring their trap.

But carry on Katie, tell us how Dame June Raine has fucked over the NHS for everyone else, I'm all ears...

Katie Hopkins: More truthful news: NHS target...


16 & 17-year-olds to be offered COVID vaccine, and won’t need parental consent


Now you know why Katie apparently knows everything about the NHS and UN, she has to learn all the scripts in order to address us in her official capacity as Dame June Raine of the MHRA or Melissa Fleming, Head of communications for the UN. Do you think Katie tells us about "the Government hoping everyone dies quicker of cancer" because she cannot live with what she personally has done to help kill people, so it's some sort of therapeutic disassociation syndrome she has created for herself? Or is she just a narcissist who enjoys perpetrating some truly nasty stuff and then bragging about it on youtube while pretending it has nothing to do with her?

Come on Katie, level with us? What flavour of cunt are you?

But back to the Shrewsbury 24, we find out Dennis Warren died on 24 April 2004...exit stage left.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Des_Warren

Warren was regarded as an energetic strike leader. As well as his work setting up pickets and speaking at union rallies and conferences, he demanded a minimum wage (of £1 an hour) and campaigned to put an end to "the lump" — a practice prevalent on non-unionised building sites, whereby the employee surrendered their employment rights in return for a cash lump sum with no tax or insurance deducted.

His death in 2004 from Parkinson's Disease has been linked with the long-term effects of the treatment he received during his incarceration, in particular the "liquid cosh" – a cocktail of tranquillisers administered to inmates.

And the question is if you think I'm being a cow, if he was a real person, why is he wearing a fake nose? You know the type of people who wear fake noses.

Interestingly enough, while Dennis Warren couldn't turn up because he was apparently dead, Ricky Tomlinson isn't even mentioned below. I don't know if it was one big con from start to finish. The British establishment seems to like blending its staged events so normal people are duped into being involved, and I think that is the MO for the Canadian truckers too.

https://shrewsbury24campaign.org.uk/

Shrewsbury 24 Campaign

In 2006 our campaign began a fifteen-year journey to overturn the prosecution and convictions of the North Wales building workers, who were charged with alleged picketing offences following the first national building workers strike in 1972. They became known as the Shrewsbury 24.

Our main focus was to obtain fresh evidence which would persuade the Court of Appeal to quash the convictions. Crucially, we gained widespread support from trade unions. We had twenty-one national trade unions and numerous trade union regions and branches affiliated to us, together with Trades Councils and CLP’s. This support was to prove central to our eventual success...

...The eight pickets who succeeded in challenging the CCRC in a judicial review were: Des Warren, John McKinsie Jones, Ken O’Shea, Michael Pierce, Malcolm Clee, Bernard Williams, Kevin Butcher and Terry Renshaw. They were joined by the families of Alfred James, Graham Roberts, John Seaburg and Roy Warburton at the Court of Appeal hearing on 3 and 4 February 2021. The 12 were represented by the campaign’s legal team led by Danny Friedman KC. The judgment was released on 23 March, which announced that all the pickets’ convictions had been quashed. They had won their case.

Anyway, I didn't actually end this post where I started it, it was meant to be about the changing look of Steve Rotheram.

[rachel]

I realise the Katie Hopkins / Dame June Raine match is a hard one visually. But it is the same voice, the same way of stressing words. She wears cosmetic contact lenses to change her eyes and on June, a no eyeliner look so her eyes visually looks a different shape.

See the contact lens line. I've not done much on age makeup when in fact I think that is the biggest reason why prosthetics exist. You think someone like June Raine is in their fifties when the person playing them might be in their thirties.

The next grab is from another reality tv show that ran in 2004, produced for the BBC. See the use of contact lenses to give the same sort of look as old June.

It is absolutely unbelievable the measures these people go to in order to change someone's appearance. And the fact very few truthers even want to mention this is because it's something they utilise themselves. From that perspective it just seems like a form of crony capitalism, and that would be okay if they stayed in their box, but they don't, they impact everyone else's life with their bullshit. So since they forced us to come to their freak show, let's have a closer look at the teeth.

First of all, look at the general characteristic of the mouth, the smile shape; see they are the same. The teeth might appear like they are different, but again look at the general characteristic of tooth sizing. Now look at how the light catches parts of Katie's teeth, there are sections that appear more opaque and white (bottom shot). Look at the front two teeth, the one on the right looks capped, or more precisely it will be a veneer that is designed to remove the slight twist we see in the tooth above. It looks like it extends half way up on the left front tooth, then looking to the left, a veneer juts out and we can see if we look at the tooth above, it's actually to hide a tooth that is turned slightly the other way. To the right Katie's tooth has been extended to make it look longer, and from that we can work out that actually the two front teeth on Katie are marginally longer than on June. I'm going to suggest those four front teeth are part of a single unit, and that makes it easy to pop in and out, something like this...

And you can see from the 'Trading Ages' grab, teeth are a standard part of prosthetic makeup, as well as contact lenses. And again that was a reality show where the actor interacted with people in the real world to see if anyone could spot her makeup under the guise of "challenging perspectives and attitudes to growing older".

[rachel]

The Katie Hopkins / Melissa Fleming match is an easy one. Fleming looks just like Katie with brown hair. I think therefore she was relying on her American accent.

Though saying that, in some pictures, you wouldn't spot her at all. Looking more like June Raine here.

We can see there is something not right about her mouth because she can't close it properly, that's a tell of false teeth over the top of her own. Check this out, we can see how she's been given a prominent lower jaw in profile.

And finally, since I bothered to match it, yep, we can see Carmen Wurgel from the U.S. race swap reality tv show 'Black. White.' is old Katie.

[rachel]

Would usually stick this in the COVID-19 thread, but since I want to quote part of Katie's last video "Katie Hopkins: More truthful news: NHS target"...

Katie Hopkins [AKA June Raine] here, with the more truthful take of the news you need coming out of batshit Bonkers Britain [you know the shit I don't say out loud when I'm chairing MHRA meetings to tell you how safe and effective the COVID-19 vaccines are, and that I'm keeping an eye on the yellow card reporting, and that those adverse effects tell me how swimmingly the vaccine program is actually going].

First up, the government are getting rid of cancer targets in England. This usually happens because they're not being met, and that's true in this case. About 80% of targets are not being hit, so what better way of dealing with that than scrapping the targets. It's a bit like the Welsh with their education program where they didn't hit those education targets, they just scrap the targets as opposed to addressing the issue with their kids.

These will be replaced by something called the faster diagnosis standard; there's another clue, if anything ever is called faster or better or brighter, you know that it's going to be the opposite, and so it will be the case here. The government [me included, being the head of the medicines and health regulator] will be hoping that perhaps you will die more quickly, certainly more cheaply, and I guess they [which is me] would very much like it if you could die from cancer more quietly as well.

...right above this article.

mRNA ‘vaccines’ must be banned once and for all
September 29, 2023
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrn ... d-for-all/

...This is not the end of the issues with the mRNA ‘vaccines’. Several immunology studies have shown that the boosters induce an antibody switch from neutralising subtypes to tolerising subtypes as well as inducing significant T cell suppression, all of which will encourage new infections and suppress the immune response to cancer.

At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.

Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.

So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.

To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.

No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.

Katie Hopkins isn't going to ban the COVID-19 vaccines, no, she'll just have another glass of red wine and pretend she's on our side. Cheers Katie!

[rachel]

Just with regards to the Ricky "Balloon Head" post; this is where I think Dennis Warren actually went...but I'm only basing that on the still images above, and not by actually doing a proper compare.

The one thing I haven't done much on is ageing make-up, and this, I believe, is the number one use of prosthetics. And in a way, this is how the controllers get to successfully do what they do.

I suspect young jobbing actors are co-opted into this work, and they don't fully understand the ramifications of what they are doing; they think it's for the greater good or it's a big joke, who knows? So they are dressed up to look ten, maybe twenty years older than they are, and they deliver their lines...then before they actually realise it, they are trapped in the matrix. So I'm going to stick up some examples of age makeup, and that way you can see Oxford University Katie can easily be aged to look like Dame June Raine, head of the 'Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency'; the body that is supposedly created to regulate and safeguard the UK population from Big Pharma, you know like Oxford-AstraZeneca.

This is from 2005, 'Jordan Gets Even', just think in the eighteen years since this series was filmed how much more realistic the techniques have become.

Jordan gets even 02(1)

UK TV channel Five commissioned Flame TV to produce Jordan Gets Even where Katie Price (aka Jordan) sets out to fool friends and family with the assistance of prosthetic makeup.

The first person on her hit list is her mum Amy, chosen because Katie winds her up on a daily basis. Amy loves pranks too so Katie thinks she’ll appreciate meeting 45 year-old Betty, a bag lady who rummages through Amy’s bins! Katie’s second target is her first agent, Samantha Bond, for whom Katie takes on the role of a tough TV producer. For her final challenge, she’s chosen to get even with her boyfriend, Peter Andre – pretending to be a mad fan. Can she pull it off?

Note the line from the eye corner to the temple. Even if the bottom part of an actor's face is natural, chances are, they are wearing a helmet type prosthetic. Example...look at the width of Macron's temple compared to his jaw.

And again, the importance of teeth to change the shape of the mouth, and likely how they talk.

Katie Price, before and after... If you hadn't seen the before picture, would you have been able to spot the prosthetic makeup? And if you could, would you have guessed correctly the age of the person underneath it?

[rachel]

Is the person who turns up as Matt P dead?
This is your answer...

If you don't see it, there are 309 posts before this one that'll let you know exactly what I mean.

Indeed...