I'll add a few more examples next, but before continuing, below is a very interesting quote from Orson Welles, It's an audio clip from a Parkinson interview, apparently 1974. I think it was originally put up for the "gender" reason, I borrowed it, as it is one of those gems that explains, in the undercurrent of meaning, what exactly is going on.
Transcript:
I don't think politicians are natural crooks. (Not all of them?) No, I don't think most of them are. I think they are actors. And actors are neither men nor women. Actors belong to a third sex. Actors are actors. And one aspect of it is the political game. But that kind of acting is not lying; as long as it refers to and reflects and exalts the essential commonly held ideals of a culture. Those performances are part of our culture even though they are performances, even though some of the actors themselves may be cynical about their performance. But what we have now cannot be excused in those terms.
Yes indeed, and that is exactly why this thread exists. Parliaments are theatres, the goings on in them should reflect society and it should serve to pass laws to protect that society as a whole and make it feel good about itself so it is fruitful. That's what Orson Welles' is talking about, the performances might just be performances to they were designed for a greater good.
"Actors are not men nor women.", yes they play whatever part they are given, and all the transgender laws are about them. Society has to change because of their lies. Children's lives have to be destroyed because the actors in parliament prefer affirming their own collective's values above the society's culture they live in.
Orson Welles was deeply troubled by the way actors had taken it into their own hands to manipulate and degradate reality instead of striving to create something better. We have in charge of western nations a death cult. It is the only direction Luciferianism can travel.
If you look in the Book of Jasher, it has an extended version of Abraham taking his son Isaac up the mountain as a sacrificed to God. It's interesting, because in it the devil appears to Abraham in disguised trying to stop him making it to the top, then he appears to Isaac in a different disguise with a different argument to try to scare him from making it to the top. When this fails the devil appears to Sarah as an old man and tells her Abraham intends to kill Isaac, misrepresenting what Abraham is doing. Sarah is grief stricken, pledges her life in place of Isaac and dies. When Abraham returns with Isaac, Sarah is dead.
In this story which of the characters best represents what actors do when the get up in parliament and spread their vindictiveness dressed in empty platitudes? This is why I declare actors playing their "political game" are part of a Luciferian death cult whether they acknowledge it or not.
"WHAT WE HAVE NOW CANNOT BE EXCUSED IN THOSE TERMS" - ORSON WELLES