The "ACT community", credit to JLB for that wording, I use the word conspie, has been flooded with nonsensical and in more than one case Frankensteining old ideas and presenting them as "groundbreaking".Neil Tibury on April 29, 2024:
Oil and Volcano debate has led me to ponder. Is oil organic matter? that is replenished easily? If this organic matter is in the earth, could it be the material that is molten?
One major example is Flat Smurf (Flat Earth). The 19th century ideas from inventor Samuel Rowbotham have been reworked (by NASA and "ex"NASA employees and all kinds of shady carnies like Eric Dubay, Mark Sargeant, Jeranism and many more char(ade)-actors) and unfortunately thousands upon thousands believe that shit.
That psyop, lucklily by real old-time truth investigators, like Chris Kendall (Hoax Busters Call, the very best truth seeking radio show there was, with all respect to Ab's and my own activities!) and Seneca, farcevalue and others recognized as such is and will be outlined more on the Flat Smurf page at Fakeopedia.
This thread is about
The Provable Nonsense of Abiogenic Oil
For those who like to listen to carnies/others (first) rather than come to their thinking from their own points, there is the video by Climate nonsense content creator Tony Heller
Tony is a petroleum geologist, so knows about the subject in depth.
-------------------------
But much better than listening to others, is going into nature and testing it for yourselves. In the years before I became a basin analyst I was organizing geologic field excursions and at those we did that what Gaia does over time and anyone can do with a burner and test tube: produce (small amounts of) oil and gas DIRECTLY from the Source Rock (SR).
So this video is from SE Spain where you find highly organic rocks that you can break and make oil and gas yourself!
In the video you see the field geologist lighting first the tube and then producing small amounts of oil (liquid phase hydrocarbons) and gas (vapor phase). As is done daily in Rock Eval analysis in laboratories.
First oil is formed, which requires "lower" temperatures than the gas phase to be produced, that you see later in the video where the match is lit again by the gas coming out of the test tube.
So this means that biogenic oil and gas production is a no-brainer; anyone can do it.
Then the """alternative""" idea that has been revived by the conspie carnies; the "Abiogenic Oil" idea.
That comes from a Soviet geologist who "couldn't identify a Source Rock for the hydrocarbons found in the basin he worked on (the famous Athabasca oil sands), so he contemplated, not proven, not established, just a hypothesis, that "the oil and gas must come from inorganic sources".
In 1951 (!!), so akin to Rowbotham's idea, "let's revive an over 50 years old idea, outdated by allll the research coming on top of it since.
Yet nobody has proven this idea. If "Abiogenic Oil" would be correct, where are ALL the evidences for it then? Which non-biogenic rock type produces complex organic compounds like the ones found in oil (oil is not just 1 chemical composition, yet a collection of many different types of hydrocarbon combinations (alkanes, benzenes, sulphur-bearing elements, etc.)In 1951, the Soviet geologist Nikolai Alexandrovitch Kudryavtsev proposed the modern abiotic hypothesis of petroleum. On the basis of his analysis of the Athabasca Oil Sands in Alberta, Canada, he concluded that no "source rocks" could form the enormous volume of hydrocarbons, and therefore offered abiotic deep petroleum as the most plausible explanation. (Humic coals have since been proposed for the source rocks.)
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic ... eum_origin
Which inorganic rock is responsible for the formation of oil and gas? Crickets.
---------------------------------------
More indications everyone can observe:
1 - Anyone of us should KNOW the many biogenic oils produced, cause we use them in our food:
- sunflower oil
- avocado oil
- peanut oil
- etc. etc. etc.
We don't get oils from inorganic compounds, do we?
2 - anyone who has been in marshy, swampy areas should have observed oil films, oil slicks and other oily evidences floating in organically rich, oxygen poor environments
Waxy plants and algae form oil, "live", at least over a short enough timespan for us to recognize (not the millions of years it takes Gaia to produce petroleum from SRs, plus the migration to reservoir rocks and the accumulation it takes to saturate those to producable levels).
They are not my most World Impress Photos of all, but you should be able to spot the coloration of the water (I boosted the contrast and colors to make it more visible).
This is a small pond in a huge area where we organized our famous Deep Green all night underground party in the WWII bunker in Western Germany in 2010.
These kind of locations YOU can find in your vicinity, in any place where you have these conditions (oxygen poor, low circulation waters and high organic matter production), you can even make it in your own garden if you have one, or just in a jar on the window sill.
==================
I hope this helps in recognizing yet another one of those "let's confuse and conquer" psyops to make people crazy, like Flat Smurf, and hopefully people will refrain from making those claims or assumptions based on almost psientific (reversed science; instead of basing your theories on the experiments, make the experiments fit to an pre-established theory that needs to be gobbled up, like "nuclear chain reactions").
So "Abiogenic Oil" = psience or scientism
Biogenic Oil = science, the art of knowing, that what can be established using experiments following the philosophy of science, the origin of it, not the 18th century corruption thereof (scientism)
The overall shape of the Earth (can ONLY be convex spherical, how much ellipsoidal it is, is up for scientific debate) and the biogenic origins of oil and gas are exactly those things WE CAN identify ourselves without the need to rely on fauxthorities from any source.
