UK related articles

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Did the BBC unwittingly reveal the true proportion of unvaccinated as at least 20%


Interesting video. ONS is using wildly inaccurate data to say how many people are unvaccinated. They say 8%, real figures look to be as high as 25%, with 35% saying they will refuse any future COVID vaccine no matter what.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Short video about the importance of knowing how many people are vaccinated.

How do we determine if a vaccine is effective against a deadly virus?
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Interesting video on bot farming on twitter.

Will Twitter and named MPs survive this video on the use of 30k bots?


It goes with all the Muppet Show stuff. I would say lots of MP twitter accounts are just bot driven centrally controlled, no real people tweeting. At the time of the Dominic Cummings travelling across the country during lock-down "scandal" all Labour MPs....

Dominic Cummings.jpeg

I put this up on twitter to a Labour MP who was calling Tories for everything about ignoring social distancing and was locked out of my account. It's the mob of journalists chasing Dominic Cummings around demanding an explanation why he ignored social distancing rules, where he subsequently resigned. At no point at all were these people ever scared of a deadly virus. And why were they not fined, it was never mentioned as if it never happened, just wiped from the internet.

msm-v-Dominic Cummings.gif
msm-v-Dominic Cummings.gif (5.69 MiB) Viewed 841 times
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Further data on the extraordinary rise in deaths in England and Wales this year.


Almost all age groups affected, and nobody in the MSM wants to go near it - 10 to 15 per cent above the 2015-9 average since about week 15, after a period of below- average deaths. Now approaching 20 per cent above average in mid-summer.
Image
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Iain Davis has got a three part analysis of the BBC's UNVACCINATED documentary.

Propaganda with Professor Hannah Fry

Part 1 - https://iaindavis.com/propaganda-fry-part-1/

Part 2 - https://iaindavis.com/propaganda-fry-part-2/

Part 3 - https://off-guardian.org/2022/08/16/the ... et-part-3/


Unvaccinated-UKC-220722


Pseudopandemic
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

If you are only going to read one of the three parts above, make it part 3. Where was the COVID PANDEMIC assumptions conceived? At the BBC and its partners, of course.
CONCLUSION
There is no criticism of the principle of vaccination made in this series of articles. To question the COVID jabs is not to question vaccination as a potentially useful public health strategy. There may be questions to be asked about vaccine schedules, but they are not asked here.

The BBC’s “Unvaccinated with Professor Hannah Fry” was a disgraceful piece of propagandist junk. The BBC set out to deceive its audience and promote government policy, and that is all that its programme achieved.

The whole premise of the so-called debate, that the majority of the population need to take the jabs but that some refuse to do so, was a lie. The vast majority of those who chose not to take the jab didn’t need one in the first place. Unfortunately, the injected were predominantly coerced. Coercion was the basis of the so-called vaccine’s widespread adoption.

The programme presented by Prof. Fry was scientifically illiterate. It denied the scientific principle of doubt and omitted all evidence that undermined its propagandist message. There was no debate, no “exploration” and no value in it for anyone except the pharmaceutical corporations and the government.

The BBC had no right to deceive the public by claiming that Prof. Fry “helped bring the UK out of its first lockdown.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

It is truly amazing that the UK public continues to pay for propaganda through the BBC license fee. The people face a crushing cost-of-living crisis that, despite attempts to blame everything on the Ukraine conflict, began long before the 2020 pseudopandemic.

That cost-of-living crisis was exacerbated by another NPI, as the government printed money like confetti to fund an unemployed populace—a populace locked up and isolated in their homes.

The majority have already sacrificed many of their freedoms on the altar of the “new normal.” When the heating is rationed this winter, we might wonder what else people will forego to afford to watch their tell-lie-vision.
Social distancing didn't apply to thespians I see.

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Worth listening to the end as Dr Malhorta talks about Pfizer and Moderna trial data.

Dr Malhorta on calling for vaccine data transparency


It's a business, from Part 1 of Iain Davis's Propaganda series (above) talking about the MHRA...
Speaking at the MHRA Board meeting on the 24th of March 2022, the chief executive of the MHRA, June Raine, said that the MHRA is “an enabling regulator, no longer a watchdog.” She added that its role is to accelerate “access to innovative products.”

This is in line with the UK government’s commitment to the G7’s 100 Day Mission (100DM). This is a global public-private partnership initiative to develop a so-called “armamentarium” of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines (DTVs).

The extremely dangerous idea is that modern DTVs, largely built upon mRNA platform technologies, don’t really need any extensive trials or safety surveillance. As soon as a global public health emergency is declared by the World Health Organisation (WHO), it will trigger governments around the world to feed taxpayer money to pharmaceutical corporations—government “partners”—who will get the DTVs on the market within 100 days.

As far back as March 2021, the MHRA was preparing to move away from acting as a public health “watchdog” and toward “enabling” pharmaceutical corporations to release their products as quickly as possible with the minimum amount of fuss. In reference to what were being called “tweaked” vaccines—namely, new iterations of existing jabs designed to tackle allegedly novel variants of COVID-19—the MHRA announced:
  • Regulatory Authorities do not consider an updated coronavirus vaccine to be an entirely novel product with the resulting requirement for lengthy full-blown clinical studies. [. . .] Evidence gathered by the large pivotal clinical studies for initial authorisation and by mass vaccination campaigns is a strong foundation for this approach. [. . .] From a clinical perspective, clinical efficacy studies prior to approval are not required.
Leaving aside the fact that the “evidence gathered by the large pivotal clinical studies” came from trials for which “no results have been posted,” the MHRA claimed that the mere act of it “approving” a COVID-19 jab somehow constituted a “strong foundation” for it not needing to bother reviewing any future clinical trial data before “approving” the next drug. Frankly, there is no reason to imagine that the MHRA is even interested in public health.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

And while talking about the MHRA...

British Drug Regulator (MHRA) Develops, Manufactures and Sells Its Own Biological Products Including Vaccines
https://www.ageofautism.com/2022/06/bri ... ng-va.html
By John Stone

(UPDATE) It is disturbing to have confirmed by Megan Redshaw’s article in The Defender yesterday (June 27) that it will be the Gates/WHO/MHRA polio vaccine which is being rolled out in the UK which according to Dr Mark Bailey is not “proved” or in layman’s language “experimental”. Obviously, the Salk oral polio vaccine has not been in use for many years and his comparison is misleading and inappropriate , and we do not know why this product is preferred to the standard inactivated product (IPV).

This is a follow on to a UK Column Report last week with excellent analysis by retired nurse Debi Evans and News anchor Brian Gerrish which focused on the board meeting of the MHRA of Tuesday June 21. There were many disturbing features in the report which runs from 1.06.50 on the link, but one really surprising fact which emerged - and I have been following the MHRA closely since at least 2004 - is that they combine purported role as a regulator of the biologics industry with developing its own biological products and trading with the industry: this happens through its subsidiary since 2013 the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) though it’s not immediately clear how long NIBSC has traded its own biological products.

Of particular relevance is that coincidentally with this meeting a new polio scare was being launched in the UK - no one as of this present time has been diagnosed with polio but polio has been detected in a North East London sewer. It is therefore fascinating to follow the conversation (which I have transcribed as best I can) between to the interim director of NIBSC, Mark Bailey, and Stephen Lightfoot, Chairman of MHRA (at 1.22.18):
  • Bailey: Significant investment by NIBSC and also its partners the Gates foundation and of course its part of the WHO lab in (indecipherable) and of course basically premiere eradication. There are three strains of polio and the team at NIBSC developed three different vaccines. It happens that strain two is the one that has been deployed most in clinical trials in Africa and it's listed product by the WHO which mean it can be used in emergency situations even though it is not proved. We are now moving to clinical trials with the other two strains as well, so it's very exciting: it's a huge huge combination: its effect is that this vaccine cannot revert. So the Salk vaccine which was used with most of us as kids there was always a low chance of it reverting back to wild type which means things like polio begins to appear in the population. This is a great leap forward here because it can't revert so basically its much safer.
  • Lightfoot: Again I think this is a great example of how the MHRA is different from other regulators around the world because we have NIBSC or National Institute for Biological Standards and Control where do some basic looking at fundamental research and this is a good example of the work that we are doing in that area and the public health benefit it can have internationally and not just in the UK so I think actually as regulator we've got some really important you know constituent parts that actually make us a very strong and capable organisation.
The reality of this is if the MHRA ever was functionally a “regulator” it has abandoned this role to facilitate business, it even trades with industry in Coronavirus spike-protein. This was emphasised in an earlier UK Column report when MHRA CEO June Raine excruciatingly discussed transforming the MHRA in 2020 from being “a regulator to an enabler” (at 47.30). And of course it is a whole different level of concern if the MHRA not only received research funding from the Gates Foundation as has previously been identified but is actually in business with them (and the WHO). Of course, the pretext was that there was an emergency and this was in the most formal bureaucratic terms an outright lie.

Back in December 2020 the British public were being assured that the MHRA was “fiercely independent” by the Health Secretary Matt Hancock which was manifestly untrue even then as I pointed out but thanks to the labyrinthine nature of the government pharmaceutical complex no one had identified that the agency had a direct financial interest.

And of course the trouble is that when governments refuse to acknowledge such absolute conflicts it is impossible for the public to judge whether they are actually newly at risk from polio or whether they are just being “had” again.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »



UK Covid deaths Feb 2020 to Dec 2021
Co-moralities = 131,000
Of these how many died of covid as only cause of death = 6000
Under 20s only of covid = 3 (a paper changes these deaths)
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »


A wealth of evidence informs one of the most important books you will ever read. Iain Davis' book, entitled "Pseudopandemic", offers an unflinching and compelling dissection of the global response to the pandemic.
Some of the slides from the presentation.

Global Governance
Image
viewtopic.php?p=2861#p2861

screenshot-odysee.com-2022.08.21-23_14_47.png
screenshot-odysee.com-2022.08.21-23_16_28.png
screenshot-odysee.com-2022.08.21-23_32_18.png
Post Reply