UK related articles

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

And you have to laugh at this photo accompanying a government "meal deal" to reset the restaurant industry
Image

source -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53337170


Chancellor gives diners 50% off on eating out
8 July 2020


What a farce.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3872
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1362 times
Been thanked: 1646 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Here's one from RT: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/494170-uk-care ... s-johnson/
Boris Johnson’s attempt to blame care facilities for Covid-19 deaths backfired after one council admitted it paid care homes to accept patients. More stories like this will emerge if he continues to deflect responsibility.

The uproar caused by PM Boris Johnson blaming care homes for the spread of coronavirus shows no sign of lessening, following revelations that cash was paid to those facilities prepared to take in hundreds of untested patients from hospitals as a council desperately tried to free up beds.

BoJo’s apparent “misspeak” – an excuse when someone unintentionally reveals what they truly think – that “too many care homes didn’t really follow the procedures in the way that they could have” has opened the floodgates to revelations of some very dubious behaviour at the outset of the pandemic.

And right up among the many missteps made throughout this crisis is the rush in Birmingham, the UK’s second largest city, to empty its NHS hospital beds of hundreds of patients, freeing up space for an expected flood of critically ill coronavirus victims.

To expedite this, the City Council admits it paid 16 care homes an incentive of £1,000 each to take in hospital patients. The proviso at the time was that the care homes had to move quickly and accept the discharged patients, whether or not they were infected with the virus.
But interestingly, quite a lot of care homes didn't have confirmed cases until they were mandated by Government to test, and we already know from multiple locations test kits have been found to be infected with Covid-19, quite possibly the planned Covid-19 delivery system to care homes was the tests themselves. Keep on testing until you get positives, then let the virus incubate and spread internally under closed-window lockdown conditions, and job done...

UK Nation Statistics up to July 1st
01july.png
01july.png (93.45 KiB) Viewed 1394 times

@xileffilex, expect the deaths to start going back up. This is not covid-19, this is the whole scale shutdown of the NHS. Cancer patients have been receiving no treatment. Surgeries are vastly behind, people with heart disease are just being sent home to die. And the UK media is now openly pushing euthanasia as a positive option. What a shock, NOT!!!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... lness.html
mail-death.png
mail-death.png (60.92 KiB) Viewed 1394 times

Back to the RT article...
In one of the more idiotic claims of the whole pandemic balls-up so far, a council statement read that it did not want Covid-19 – the killer virus that so far has struck nearly 12 million people worldwide and claimed more than half a million lives – to be “a barrier to discharge” from hospital to care homes.
The way they ALWAYS do it, apparently condemning people's actions while cementing the abounding FAKE NARRATIVE.

I guess Covid-19 might well be the starting plan of getting the UK's population down from 66 million to the forecast 15 million by 2025. The cabal is having a good try at least...

http://www.deagel.com/country/United-Kingdom_c0209.aspx
UK-pop.png
UK-pop.png (97.37 KiB) Viewed 1394 times
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Even in Sweden, there are reported excess death, pace the absence of lockdown/much higher proportion of elderly people than, say, Ireland.

We could confirm those 60K excess UK deaths if we could count the population but that's not possible. So, yes, the thinning out of the population, the useless eaters/pension recipients can continue if people continue to be locked up in care homes. The corollary of that is that measured life expectancy HAS to fall

The greatly differing weekly/monthly excess deaths in various European countries e.g. Belgium, could easily be reconciled with their care systems for the elderly and how their hospitals were emptied.

Can we really believe ONS stats though?

The number of funerals would be an extra confirmation, but again that's impossible to find.

I think Boris Johnson was delibverately hinting as what's been happening without putting the blame where it ought to be - on the NHS. Those who hole the money realise that most of the NHS money goes on the useless eaters at the end of our lives. Euthanasia by the back door. Certainly the delayed diagnoses of potentially terminal diseases will start to affect younger age groups, which will no doubt delight the eugenicists.
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

It's interesting , as highlighted by UK Column, that the government has just issued guidance for Public Health Officers 3.5 months after the law was enacted enabling the forcible removal of persons to a place for swabbing and interrogating on the say so of the said officials, with the aid of "constables" or border forces.

This was summarised and analysed here in early April
https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content ... s-act-2020

No court was envisaged disagreeing with the ruling of the Public Health Officer.
The detention could be for up to 48 days, but potentially extended to 14 days. This would be in circumstances where people receiving the phone call or knock on their door did not co-operate. i.e. it's compulsory. Reasonable force may be used to remove people to the testing centre,incidentally.

This is all the more relevant now that track and tracing is becoming mainstream - customers in bars and restaurants have to either pay by i-phone or leave contact details. So if one of your fellow diners fesses up to Covid 19 symptoms, await the call....for being potentially infectious.

Why give this guidance now when the UK is now seeing below average deaths for the time of year? Is the government expecting an increase in caseload of asymptomatic nonsense?

examples...

Recruiting now - 6 months, part time
Southwark [London borough] Council
Public Health Fellow
new
Southwark Council 3.8
London • Temporarily remote
The positions will be closely supported by a public health policy officer or intelligence analyst *** and will focus on the Covid-19 pandemic response and wider determinant of health..

or
https://www.totaljobs.com/job/public-he ... ob90076621
Senior Public Health Officer [Temporary]
Birmingham (B1), Birmingham

Due to the current COVID pandemic, Birmingham City Council are recruiting for a Senior Public Health Officer to help with the Council's response. You will be required to help to review the current policies and procedure and provide any amendments that relate to the current circumstances and to ensure anything existing is being adhered to. You will also be required to relay information and reports to the wider organisation at a time where there is a strong focus on public health.

Experience of Epidemiology would be highly beneficial....


Notice how various countries are talking of localised outbreaks which will need to be contained...

The only epidemic I see is that of healthy people wearing masks.

***]Public Health Intelligence Analyst


Sutton Council
Sutton [London]

2 days ago Full–time
Salary: Grade 8 £33,291 - £40,728 per annum (£42,684 unconsolidated maximum achievable through performance related progression)
Working Hours: Full-time (36 hours per week)
Contract Type: Fixed-Term Contract (12 Months)
Location: Sutton Civic Offices with some home working due to COVID response

An exciting opportunity has arisen to join the London Borough of Sutton’s Public Health team as a Public Health Intelligence Analyst to work on COVID-19 projects such as Test and Trace, and other wider public health areas. We are a busy team working across the Council and partner agencies to provide public health intelligence, guidance to tackle health inequalities and wider determinants.

If you would like to immerse yourself in a wide-ranging and fast-paced public health intelligence role, have experience of working in health and social care and a wide knowledge of statistical and epidemiological methodology and data sets, we would like to hear from you.

About the role
As a Public Health Intelligence Analyst you will be working as part of the Public Health team to collate, analyse and interpret health intelligence in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and for the wider public health agenda.

The postholder will analyse, interpret and make recommendations on statistical information, find innovative ways to present complex information to a range of audiences to provide actionable insights, and lead on or support specific projects working with other members of the Public Health team and internal/external partners. The postholder will need to work collaboratively with officers across the council and with partners locally and regionally.


Sounds like East Germany to me.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3872
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1362 times
Been thanked: 1646 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

@xileffilex, agree, sounds like East Germany. The people who created the Nazis and the world wars didn't just go away. It's ideological and it is religious.

Since Covid-19 test kits from multiple locations have been found to be contaminated with Covid-19, force testing could well mean forced infection - no media reporting have put those two facts together. But I'm going to guess that's where any actual real second wave will come from.

This is the PDF: Guidance for public health officers - Potentially infectious persons

And on page two, their false god...

sd.png
sd.png (46.02 KiB) Viewed 1364 times
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Compulsory face masks for shops in the UK here we come, because that's the script BoJo has been given

... but meanwhile in Lockdown Leicester - here comes the knock at your door. I don't think it's staged

https://twitter.com/RussPLFC/status/1281934926900801536

https://twitter.com/RussPLFC/status/1281922516005662725
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Image

source - https://twitter.com/AlistairHaimes/stat ... 2517856256

His twitter account a good source of analysis

How did they manage to get a flu season in April, though.
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Bookmarking.....

An excellent series of podcasts from the UK which deals with the Covid-19 hoax - from Mark Windows
https://windowsontheworld.net/live-shows/

also on RBN - navigate from here:
https://www.republicbroadcastingarchive ... ly-6-2020/


I hadn't looked at the David Icke Forum for a long time but was suprised to see that the Covid-19 mega thread seems free from the usual procession of trolls and agents who would shut down any of the threads exposing hoaxes and staged events on the old forum.
Current page
https://social.davidicke.com/index.php? ... /&page=136
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Sadly, all the old David Icke forums have been lost due to software problems [allegedly] which contained some excellent research among the mountain of troll attacks, but David has produced an excellent summary of the current Covid-19 situation in the UK, July 10
https://davidicke.com/2020/07/10/walkin ... videocast/

He's also promoting Peter Hitchens, who's one lonely MSM voice pointing out the sheer lunacy of what''s going on in this and most other countries - the level of general scepticism is high but many people in business have to go along with the nonsense otherwise the state will shut them down and people will lose their jobs.

https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk ... chens.html

The accompanying photo of PM Johnson is ironic. Indeed, he who faked his fake Covid-19 condition certainly wouldn't need to wear a mask "to stop airborne transmission" of this non-existent virus which lives on particles and in water....

Image

Michael Gove says it was "basic good manners courtesy and consideration" to wear a mask aks face diaper/nappy in shops ....the same "guidance" [i.e. not law] steering clown who suggested "exercise" should only last 1 hour - and all the idiots followed those guidelines. Not me though.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53381000
xileffilex
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

And the BBC, up to its usual tricks, puffs a paper, conveniently not peer reviewed, which suggests [also conveniently for the narrative] from King's College London, which suggests that immunity from the fake virus may only last a couple of months - and off we go again. Best to get a vaxxeeeeeen for permanent protexxxion....

Posted at 10:0210:02
Coronavirus immunity may only last for months

Michelle Roberts

Health editor, BBC News online

A new study of people who have caught and recovered from coronavirus raises the prospect that immunity to the virus may be short-lived.


so I guess, Boris may already have contracted it again...
Longitudinal evaluation and decline of antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 20148429v1

For reference, here's the Lancet paper on face masks, physical distancing [they don't like the term social distancing now]

https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals ... 1142-9.pdf
conclusion...
Our comprehensive systematic review provides the
best available information on three simple and common interventions to combat the immediate threat of
COVID-19, while new evidence on pharmacological treatments, vaccines, and other personal protective strategies is
being generated. Physical distancing of at least 1 m is
strongly associated with protection, but distances of up to
2 m might be more effective. Although direct evidence is
limited, the optimum use of face masks, in particular N95
or similar respirators in health-care settings and 12–16-layer
cotton or surgical masks in the community, could depend
on contextual factors; action is needed at all levels to
address the paucity of better evidence.
Eye protection
might provide additional benefits. Globally collaborative
and well conducted studies, including randomised trials,
of different personal protective strategies are needed
regardless of the challenges, but this systematic appraisal
of currently best available evidence could be considered to
inform interim guidance.
no competing author interests of great significance, but the research was PART FUNDED by the WHO. check!
Post Reply