UK related articles

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Crisis as excess deaths soar to levels higher than during Covid pandemic
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/1 ... -pandemic/

UK Column News was reporting on this above article.

UK Column News - 2nd November 2022.jpg
UK Column News - 2nd November 2022 (3).jpg

Full UK Column News - 2nd November 2022 here.
https://odysee.com/@ukcolumn:9/ukcolumn-news-021122:1
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Ex-Health Secretary, and current Chancellor Jeremy Hunt getting his excuses in early in 2017 on why murdering the elderly in Britain is a good idea.

xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

^^^^ but there wasn't a 'pandemic' - the elderly were sacrificed to create a the illusion of a pandemic.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Dr John Campbell going through the government data. He's still saying there would have been more deaths without restrictions. But it is inexplicable to him why certain deaths around COVID-19 mattered to the government and the media, and now with other deaths they couldn't give a flying fuck.



John, John, you've got to look at the policy the death is tied to to understand if it matters to the government, opposition parties, MSM, the health agencies, big tech, etc, etc.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

Some references from my current feed.

Norman Fenton - Like the whole narrative around Covid 19 has been driven by incorrect data - International Congress on Pandey Management/Health
https://odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/Norman-Fe ... sAmsg&t=51




Clare Craig - The myths that led to Lockdowns - International Congress on Pandey Management/Health
https://odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/Clare-Cra ... sAmsg&t=46






Last edited by rachel on Sat Nov 05, 2022 5:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Covid is a fake [positive] test for "something". How can a test result even be given as a cause of death, whether primary of secondary? It's nonsense.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

A follow up of Prof Norman Fenton's article on complaints to the MHRA and BBC about the 'Unvaccinated' documentary. Worth a read, I've not quoted the correspondence.

MHRA and BBC fail to meet their own deadline for responding to complaints about "Unvaccinated"
https://www.normanfenton.com/post/mhra- ... vaccinated
...I have written extensively about the serious problems with the BBC2 documentary "Unvaccinated" and the many complaints made about it. In this article I reproduced (with their permission) the complaint sent by a group of scientists and clinicians to MHRA about how the programme likely breached regulations governing advertising of prescription medicines. The article also reproduced the ludicrous response from MHRA dismissing the complaint.

On 4 Sept 2022 the same group of scientists and clinicians sent this appeal of the initial MHRA response . Despite the MHRA 20-day response time they like to quote there has been no response. They wrote to the MHRA again last week to ask when they could expect a response to their appeal but have yet to receive a response to that email either.

Interestingly, the BBC has also failed to meet its own response deadline to my follow-up complaint of 26 August to them about the programme; note that follow-up complaints have to be made to the Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) and you have to go through quite a few hoops for them to even allow such a follow-up complaint. Here is the acknowledgement they sent on 27 August:...
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

xileffilex wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 10:17 am
Focussing only on the EU [but with the UK easily slipping into the trend] we can see that despite all the various and often greatly different responses to the fake covid event in all the countries there seems to be some kind of strange unifying trend across the whole sub-continent.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistic ... statistics

What could possibly connect all these countries to produce the same or similar result?

Every country had a "vaccine" rollout. But it couldn't possibly be anything to do with that, could it? 10 to 26 per cent excess mortality is not some aberration when it occurs across so many countries in August 2022.
Image

I think UK Column may have shown the above graphic.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

NHS England Admits its Hospital Mask Mandate is Based on Modelling That Simply Assumes They Work
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/11/06/nhs ... they-work/
In a letter dated October 4th 2022, Dame Ruth May (Chief Nursing Officer and national lead for infection control), responding on behalf of Amanda Pritchard (NHS England Chief Executive), asserted that there was “strong” evidence that widespread use of face coverings achieved a “significant impact” on the prevention of COVID-19 transmission. To support this premise she cited a computational modelling study, posted in October 2021. This pre-print paper reported that, based on its model, “universal masking” would achieve a 46% reduction in infections among healthcare workers. Given the substantial amount of robust scientific evidence available, aggregating around the conclusion that – in the real world – masks constitute an ineffective viral barrier, it is astonishing that NHS England is relying on a modelling study to justify its blanket policies.

There appears to be little recognition of the inauspicious legacy of the epidemiologist Professor Neil Ferguson. In collaboration with his colleagues at Imperial College London, Ferguson deployed computer modelling to predict the doomsday scenarios of Covid killing 2.2 million Americans and 500,000 people in the U.K. Such inaccurate prophecies were largely responsible for spooking Western governments into lockdowns, an unprecedented public health policy that has led to extensive collateral harms. Now healthcare chiefs are citing a similar modelling study as a key reason for persisting with mask recommendations in our hospitals, health centres and GP practices.

An initial glance at the study highlighted in the NHS England response is sufficient to reveal that it falls well short of an evidential bar that would justify imposing masks on healthy people. As a pre-print paper, it has not been peer-reviewed, and it comes with an explicit cautionary note at the beginning of the article that “it should not be considered conclusive, used to inform clinical practice or referenced by the media as validated information”. Within the body of the article, there are further warnings about the dubious reliability of its findings – for example, references to its reported outcomes as “highly uncertain”.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by rachel »

I generally don't watch much of Dr. John Campbell, and again with this one I did jumped through the middle section. But you can see where he is mentally at the end of the video.



And the last video below where it is inexplicable to him why certain deaths around COVID-19 mattered so much to the government and the media, and now with higher deaths "without a cause" they don't want to know.

viewtopic.php?p=5385#p5385
Post Reply