Vaccine damage reports

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
fakeologist
Site Admin
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:01 pm
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 138 times
Contact:

Vaccine damage reports

Post by fakeologist »

warvax1.jpg
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

Swedish paper on reverse transcription of mRNA in vitro in human liver cell line






Paper: Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

The Lancet Publishes Medical Prof’s Warning That Natural Immunity Has Made Vaccine Mandates Irrelevant
https://beckernews.com/new-the-lancet-p ... ant-44156/

Dr. McConagle laid out the recent findings on natural immunity and how they stack up with vaccinated immunity. Lancet Letter
“First, it is well established that for single stranded RNA viruses such as influenza, natural immunity after recovery from infection provides better protection than vaccination, which needs to be undertaken annually because of waning vaccine immunity,” the letter reads. “The same has been shown for SARS-CoV-2; in one study, individuals exposed to natural infection were ten-times less likely to be reinfected compared with vaccinated individuals without natural infection (adjusted hazard ratio 0·02, 95% CI 0·01–0·04 for previous infection vs 0·26, 0·24–0·28 for vaccination). Individuals exposed to natural infection were also less likely to be admitted to hospital with COVID-19.”

...“Second, before the COVID-19 pandemic, it was a well-established principle that although systemic vaccination against viral respiratory tract pathogens protects vaccinees against serious infection, these individuals can still transmit virus to non-vaccinated individuals because of a lack of mucosal immunity,” he continued. “Therefore, individuals with immunity resulting from natural infection are probably less likely to transmit the infection to vulnerable patients (who should themselves be vaccinated) compared with those who are vaccinated but not naturally immune. Long-term immunity in the upper airway cannot be directly measured, and serum antibody levels are not a surrogate for mucosal immunity.”

...“Third, numerous studies have shown that vaccination in individuals with previous natural SARS-CoV-2 infection induces so-called super-immunity (or hybrid immunity)—ie, higher antibody and T-cell responses compared with vaccination alone,” the letter notes. “This concept is often evoked in favour of vaccination, but this super-immune state has no proven long-term clinical correlates, and an increasing number of studies show marginal, if any, additional benefits of vaccination in individuals with natural immunity.”

...“In some countries, including Germany, the voices of immunologists around the equivalence of natural immunity to vaccination are at least partly heard, since health-care workers who have recovered from natural SARS-CoV-2 infection are exempt from mandated vaccination for 90 days,” he added. “However, based on the history of viral pneumonia and natural immunity, the scientific basis of this time frame is unclear—arguably it should be indefinite.”
Meanwhile...

Medical Experts Reveal the Scientific Reason Why Covid Vaccines Cannot ‘Stop the Spread’ or Prevent Infection
https://beckernews.com/medical-experts- ... ion-43621/
Two highly esteemed doctors have produced scientific findings that show that not only do these mRNA shots fail to stop the spread of an airborne virus like Covid-19, they are unable to prevent transmission.

...In other words, there was never a time when any scientist could claim these “vaccines” could “prevent transmission” based on any empirical evidence. They either lied about claiming they knew that they could stop transmission or they deliberately designed the “vaccines” to be vectors for virus transmission in order to justify universal vaccine mandates.

Thus, while the scientific data suggest the mRNA shots being marketed as ‘vaccines’ may correlate with a lowered risk of hospitalization and death among the ‘at-risk’ segment of the population, the vaccines are not an impediment to infection or transmission.

Therefore, vaccine mandates and vaccine passports are irrelevant from a public policy standpoint. They do nothing but balkanize society, violate individuals’ health rights, and introduce more long-term medical unknowns for Americans who are not significantly at-risk from Covid-19 (such as those who are young or have natural immunity).
And...
Johns Hopkins university in January dropped a quiet bombshell about natural immunity that went widely ignored in the mainstream media. Dr. Marty Makary, spearheading a team at Johns Hopkins to do the work the CDC and NIH refused to do, showed that 99% of unvaccinated people known to have Covid infections had robust “natural immunity” that did not diminish for at least 650 days.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

HEALTH SUBCOMMITTEE HB1871

video: https://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.p ... _id=643487

Ninnyd  Waiting~4~the Revolution - Very important watch  They are warning and no one’s listening.jpg
And I'll let you know that Pfizer, Moderna and J&J all went out of their way to eliminate patients with natural immunity from their studies. Why did they do that? I wonder why? Because these patients retain an antigenic fragment of the virus in their system for a long time, we're finding even 15 months later. They're at serious risk for hyper immune response. They didn't want their studies to be messed up so they went out of their way to eliminate every single patient in every single study. J&J Moderna Pfizer to make sure that none of these patients were enrolled in the study. I don't think any of you realise that. So we are taking let's save the children five to 11 about 80% have had the virus already. If we mandate the vaccine and this five to 11 year old group of 20 million kids in the United States, that would be basically somewhere close to 20 million of these kids plus would actually have already had the virus. They're at high risk for hyper immune response. That means they're going to die, some of them are going to die if you mandate a vaccine. That's what that means. So it's very important to realise that if we go down this direction, right, where we mandate vaccines and people have already had it, this is not a civil liberties thing, this is a major poor decision medically. Forget about the civil liberties, if you allow it to happen, you're allowing children to die.
I do wonder why they needed their white coats on.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »



from:
rimGloBAL
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2022 11:24 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rimGloBAL »

antipodean
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by antipodean »

Maybe someone who's vocation is working in the City in Stocks & Shares, Investments etc. Can explain the significance of this.
Came across it on facebook.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... ry_doc.xml#
Pfizer just filed a form 25 with the security exchange commission (SEC)
You file a form 25 if your shares are worthless, or if you want to go private or IF YOU NO LONGER WANT TO BE SUBJECT TO STRICT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
I have spent over 23 years in investing on the US markets and first time we have seen this form - only possible reasons would be liquidation, bankruptcy, listing on other exchange, name change (administrative filing), company acquired and name not remaining - wtf?
antipodean
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by antipodean »

Placed the above link into the search function on Twitter.

It's possible it could be fake.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

antipodean wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2022 5:06 am It's possible it could be fake.

I saw a discussion on this, apparently in 2012 they did the same thing relating to this:
FNZJnb_XIAAt9dc.jpg

This is apparently the current delisting. So reports would appear to be correct.
FNakg-MXEAgMr2V 13-30-30-538.jpg
Post Reply