Re: Corona madness
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 8:22 pm
COVID-19 showed us how much of the UK media is just a glorified press release system for government agendas.
FROM 2021
FROM 2021
Fakeologist related but not restricted
https://fakeologist.com/forums2/
rachel wrote: ↑Sat May 09, 2020 2:27 pm From the same author, Andrew Mather, the video he mentions near the end where he analyses the 2015 Fox interview with Bill Gates predicting a global pandemic...
Bill Gates Coronavirus Fox News Chris Wallace 5th April 2015 Virus Warning Analysis
On 5th April Bill Gates told us everything we need to do to stop the virus. It's just not quite how people have interpreted it. 26 million viewers misled. Bill Gates told the truth and people didn't even notice. He also misrepresented the coronavirus, its behaviour and what we need to do to respond entirely. Find out what you should have realised before the government every got you to go to your homes.
Bill Gates Coronavirus Fox News Chris Wallace 5th April 2015 Virus Warning Analysis
pdf version of presentation
Andrew gives this link - https://www.foxnews.com/video/614722377 ... show-clips - from Fox's own archive and suggests we watch the 2015 interview before watching his analysis. Ha. 'Chicken Little' Fox has taken it down, together with youtube third-party mirrors suspended. Instead we get more copies than you can shake a fist at of 'Third Reich' Bill giving a new 2020 interview referring back to what he said in 2015 - in the words of our Jesuit betters, 'we can't change the past, but we can change what people remember about the past'.
Slides from the previous post's video...
Then he held a dress rehearsal in October 2019 (Event 201), and funded Imperial College, London and its expert Neil Ferguson, the author of the 530,000 UK deaths threat report used by the Government to shut down Britain and impose Nazi State detention.
And from this video...
June 2020: Bret Weinstein was "very concerned" about SARS-CoV-2 b/c "brand new evolutionarily".
Convinced the U.S. should've locked down more severely to snuff it out.
"Hated" the idea of curbing civil liberties, but makes exception for "global pandemic" & unknown virus.
Bret Weinstein, August 4, 2022:
Weinstein: “Lockdowns I think I got right. Which was, there was a place for lockdowns, but they needed to be more intense than they were. They needed to be short duration and they needed to be paired with excellent-quality testing, which frankly we still don’t have. Which, I don’t know, I can’t imagine why we still don’t have it. I think it’s a problem money would solve, and the fact that we haven’t dedicated enough money to have tests that are worth anything is conspicuous to me.
But I would have had, let’s say – yes, painful–six week, very intense lockdown. And the reason for that is that gives it enough time –most of the transmission was at home. So, six weeks gives it enough time to burn through, you know, places where we were corralled together, such that at the point you lift that six-week mandate, you have a small number of places where active COVID still exists.
And you had good testing, you could figure out where they were and you apply some very local solutions that we – the rest of us could have gone back to life. Given that we never had good tests, I would not favor that plan. But, were I in charge, I would’ve invested very heavily–
Shellenberger: Then the Asian, East Asian approach. Korea, Hong Kong.
Weinstein: Well, yes and no. Good tests would be key, and then an epidemiologically sensible lockdown in which the virus was given a chance to be not contagious in any given group. So that, you know, you would have hotspots but you could find them and the rest of us wouldn’t be infecting each other. So I think I had that right, but we don’t know, because we didn’t do that.”