I've noticed of late people drumming of support for trying to debunk fake science with more fake science. It's like, you can get on the boat of being a climate skeptic as long as you use this other utter piece of crap science as your argument. I've thus far refused to take the bait. But here's another example of something we should apparently be up in arms about.
The New Scientist Cancels Former BBC Science Correspondent Because of His Links to the Global Warming Policy Foundation
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/26/the ... oundation/
Renowned, multi-award winning science writer Dr. David Whitehouse – who has an asteroid named after him – has slammed the New Scientist as “offensive and prejudicial” for rejecting a feature it commissioned from him on the Earth’s inner core after it discovered that he serves on the Academic Advisory Board of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF). The GWPF is a climate contrarian think tank founded by the former Conservative Chancellor Nigel Lawson.
"…it would be first about how we’ve finally confirmed the existence of this inner core… then I guess it becomes about what we know about it’s structure (speculation about iron crystals, etc.) and how it formed… And finally, I guess we’d want to explore what the various scenarios for how it formed might inform how we think about habitability on other planets."...
And then it goes on to cry about being cancelled, with this quote.
...The cancellation of eminent science writers and statisticians like Dr. Whitehouse and Professor Fenton for ‘wrongthink’ highlights the ever-shrinking boundaries of the discourse around science and medicine and the unwillingness of science’s gatekeepers to challenge groupthink and politically sensitive dogmas. As Dr. Whitehouse says, “science thrives on debate and scrutiny”. Silencing those who challenge prevailing orthodoxies was the approach favoured by the Catholic church in 17th Century Italy and is completely at odds with the scientific method.
Indeed. But the problem is, the
Copernican heliocentric model and everything that goes along with it is copyright to that very same Catholic Church. And if you are going to base your brand on their intellectual property, then expect them to come along and vanish you when you bring their brand image into disrepute.
The Copernican model was specifically created so the Catholic Church could reintroduce the Indulgence System it had in place before the Reformation... The point of the model is exactly that, and how they've ended up devising their satanic story to remove the Creator God so they can play god. So you coming along trying to earn money on the back of their lies, they own you, and therefore they can cancel you. Because the end of the Copernican arc, it turns out, is 'climate change' and the 'carbon-credits system'. So you either repent and tell them where they can shove their entire satanic model, including the earth's core and asteroids, or you shut-up and buy your carbon credits, because you've chosen your God.
It is said the Elijah message will be preached before the end. This is it.
1 Kings 18:17-21
And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father's house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the LORD, and thou hast followed Baalim. Now therefore send, and gather to me all Israel unto mount Carmel, and the prophets of Baal four hundred and fifty, and the prophets of the groves four hundred, which eat at Jezebel's table.
So Ahab sent unto all the children of Israel, and gathered the prophets together unto mount Carmel. And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.