Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

Florida "Vaccine Hesitancy" REDUCED Infant Mortality in 2021
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/flori ... cy-reduced
This is a kind of a shocking finding to me and I want to be fact checked on what I wrote below. I would like to be proven wrong.

In 2021, vaccination of infants massively decreased in Florida due to “vaccine hesitancy”. Along with decrease in childhood vaccinations, all cause infant mortality ALSO MASSIVELY DECREASED, in a perfect lockstep!

The changes are very significant and can be considered an unintended experiment.

Say what?

What I found is that in 2021, parents of newborns in Florida were much more “vaccine hesitant”, for reasons obvious to my readers, and therefore childhood vaccinations decreased from 93.4% previously to only 79.3% in 2021. During the same time, all cause infant mortality under 1 year of age in Florida also DECREASED by 8.93%.

Both changes are huge.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

And this isn't the first time this has been noticed...
rachel wrote: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:19 pm I feel I've got to repeat this from bottom of page two...
http://fakeologist.com/forums2/viewtopic.php?p=327#p327

If you crunch into the data of the chart below, there has been a significant fall in death rates of under 18s during lockdown against the previous six years. But this decline is almost entirely accounted for by one group only, that of babies aged between 0-1 year - 'sudden infant death syndrome'. It would appear then, cancelling all non-essential hospital services is very good for the health of infants.

Image

But why have babies stopped dying during lockdown? Maybe because the bulk of what has been cancelled for this age group is GOVERNMENT MANDATED VACCINES.

And let me remind you what the World Health Organisation (WHO) say in the intro to their 2018 Assessment Report of the Global Vaccine Action Plan.

Image

NUREMBERG STYLE TRIALS ARE NOW LONG OVERDUE.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

And following on...
rachel wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:08 pm VACCINE INGREDIENTS
Here are just SOME vaccine ingredients.
These are being INJECTED into children:
  • Formaldehyde/Formalin – Highly toxic systematic poison and carcinogen.
  • Betapropiolactone – Toxic chemical and carcinogen. May cause death/permanant injury after very short exposure to small quantities. Corrosive chemical.
  • Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide – May cause damage to the liver, cardiovascular system, and central nervous system. May cause reproductive effects and birth defects.
  • Aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, and aluminum salts – Neurotoxin. Carries risk for long term brain inflammation/swelling, neurological disorders, autoimmune disease, Alzheimer’s, dementia, and autism. It penetrates the brain where it persists indefinitely.
  • Thimerosal (mercury) – Neurotoxin. Induces cellular damage, reduces oxidation-reduction activity, cellular degeneration, and cell death. Linked to neurological disorders, Alzheimer’s, dementia, and autism.
  • Polysorbate 80 & 20 – Trespasses the Blood-Brain Barrier and carries with it aluminum, thimerosal, and viruses; allowing it to enter the brain.
  • Glutaraldehyde – Toxic chemical used as a disinfectant for heat sensitive medical equipment.
  • Fetal Bovine Serum – Harvested from bovine (cow) fetuses taken from pregnant cows before slaughter.
  • Human Diploid Fibroblast Cells – aborted fetal cells. Foreign DNA has the ability to interact with our own.
  • African Green Monkey Kidney Cells – Can carry the SV-40 cancer-causing virus that has already tainted about 30 million Americans.
  • Acetone – Can cause kidney, liver, and nerve damage.
  • E.Coli – Yes, you read that right.
  • DNA from porcine (pig) Circovirus type-1
  • Human embryonic lung cell cultures (from aborted fetuses)
You can view all of these ingredients on the CDCs website. I encourage everyone to do their own research. Look up the MSDS on these chemicals. Read the thousands of peer reviewed studies that have evaluated the biological consequences these chemicals can have on the body, especially when being injected.

Fact check vaccine ingredients here:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkb ... able-2.pdf
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

Rare, severe liver damage reported in kids in U.S. and Europe
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-n ... -rcna24553
Public health officials in Europe and the United States are investigating dozens of puzzling cases of severe hepatitis in young children.

Hepatitis is an inflammation of the liver. The cause is often a virus, but the viruses that commonly cause the illness — hepatitis A, B, C, D and E — have been ruled out in the cases in question, leaving doctors searching for the culprit.

In several cases, the illness was so severe that the children needed a liver transplant. No deaths have been reported.

The World Health Organization on Friday said it was investigating 74 cases of severe acute hepatitis in children under age 13 in the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. Three cases were also reported in Spain, the WHO said. It's not clear when symptoms for most of the children began, but of the first 10 identified in the U.K., nine got sick in March and one in January 2022, according to the WHO.

In the U.S., nine cases have been reported in children ages 6 and younger in Alabama.

Dr. Wes Stubblefield, district medical officer for the Alabama Department of Public Health, said that all of the children were otherwise healthy before becoming ill, and that there is no obvious link among the children.

The Alabama cases were first reported by Stat News.

With the common hepatitis viruses ruled out, the current leading theory is that a different virus, called adenovirus type 41, is to blame.

Five of the nine children in Alabama, identified between October 2021 and February, tested positive for adenovirus type 41. But adenoviruses are respiratory viruses that typically cause the common cold, and are not generally associated with liver injury.
Out of interest, when exactly did the UK start vaccinating children?
(Remember, the UK government’s Chief Medical Adviser is a woman in a mask pretending to be a man.)

https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... -years-old
JCVI statement on vaccination of children aged 5 to 11 years old
Published 16 February 2022

On 22 December 2021, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advised that children aged 5 to 11 years in a clinical risk group, or who are a household contact of someone who is immunosuppressed should be offered primary course vaccination with two 10 microgram (mcg) doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (Comirnaty®). JCVI has since reviewed evidence on the potential impact of extending COVID-19 vaccination to other children aged 5 to 11. Consideration had been given to the health benefits of vaccination in this age group, the potential educational benefits, and the impact on NHS services of delivering a 2-dose vaccination programme to around 5 million young children.

Advice
JCVI advises a non-urgent offer of two 10 mcg doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (Comirnaty®) to children aged 5 to 11 years of age who are not in a clinical risk group. The 2 doses should be offered with an interval of at least 12 weeks between doses.

The intention of this offer is to increase the immunity of vaccinated individuals against severe COVID-19 in advance of a potential future wave of COVID-19.

For deployment teams, JCVI advises that:
  • the offer of COVID-19 vaccination to 5 to 11 year olds who are not in a clinical risk group should not displace the delivery of other paediatric non-COVID-19 or COVID-19 immunisation programmes
  • delivery of paediatric non-COVID-19 immunisation programmes across all ages should receive due attention, particularly where vaccine coverage has fallen behind due to the COVID-19 pandemic and where there is evidence of health inequalities
  • use of the Pfizer-BioNTech 10 mcg paediatric formulation vaccine should be encouraged for all pupils in the relevant academic year for children aged 11 to 12 to reduce complexity in programme delivery and expected reactogenic events for individuals
This advice on the offer of vaccination to 5 to 11-year olds who are not in a clinical risk group is considered by JCVI as a one-off pandemic response programme[footnote 1]. As the COVID-19 pandemic moves further towards endemicity in the UK, JCVI will review whether, in the longer term, an offer of vaccination to this, and other paediatric age groups, continues to be advised.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

Vaccine mysteries need explaining
https://spectator.com.au/2022/04/vaccin ... xplaining/
In less than three months, since Covid vaccines were rolled out to children aged 5-11, three have died. A 7-year-old boy and a 9-year-old girl suffered cardiac arrests, the worst outcome of myocarditis, and a 6-year- old boy also died but whoever filed his report simply described his medical reaction as an ‘adverse event following immunisation’, a description that provides no useful information to investigators and has been used in 755 reports, 161 of them fatal.

There have also been 49 reports of adverse reactions in babies via exposure their mothers’ breast milk including trouble breathing, chest pain, fatigue, dizziness – all symptoms of myocarditis. One infant suffered Bell’s palsy. There have been 244 reports of spontaneous abortions, 14 stillbirths, 11 reports of foetal deaths, 11 of foetal hypokinesia (decreased bodily movement of the foetus). The vaccines were not tested on pregnant or breast-feeding women. The TGA had no clinical basis to say they were safe.

Since the vaccines were rolled out in February last year, 19,926 people have reported adverse reactions and 815 people have died. More than two every day. Compare that to influenza vaccines – 21 deaths in 47 years, less than one death every two years. Are any of these tragedies caused by the Covid vaccine? Is anyone at the TGA trying to find out? When the US government rushed out a swine flu vaccine to 45 million people in 1976, the program was halted when it was reported to have caused one case of Guillain-Barré syndrome per 100,000 persons vaccinated, and 53 deaths. To date in the US there have been 26,693 deaths, including those Pfizer, Moderna and J&J have reported occurring abroad, 49,516 people are permanently disabled, and the mainstream media says nothing.

Why the difference? In 1976, vaccine manufacturers could be sued for injury and death. Now they have immunity from prosecution unless they can be shown to have engaged in fraud or to have hidden safety data. While courageous scientists, doctors and whistleblowers sound the alarm about damning evidence, no one who has been coercing people to get vaccinated – government, media, employers – wants to admit that there might be a problem. Like ramping ambulances, nobody wants to explain why those things happen.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

Not quite infants, but...

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

Opera Snapshot_2022-06-16_171024_twitter.com.png

Florida "Vaccine Hesitancy" REDUCED Infant Mortality in 2021
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/flori ... educed?s=r
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

Dr Clare Craig explains why the FDA should NOT have granted approval for roll-out in the 6 month to 4 yr old children cohort.
This trial should have been deemed null and void. The regulators are failing to do their job.

It should be noted, the FDA voted unanimously to approve the drug for this age group. Given the problems outlined, this is unbelievable.

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »

URGENT: OMG the Pfizer data for kids under 5
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... mments?s=r
That 80 percent figure for efficacy you’ve seen reported is worse than a joke, it’s essentially a fabrication.

Here’s what the Food and Drug Administration and Pfizer did; they only counted cases after the THIRD mRNA dose.

But of the 375 Sars-Cov-2 infections in the trial, 365 occurred before the third dose. Only 10 occurred after the third dose.

Yes, you are reading that right. The efficacy figure is based on 3 PERCENT OF ALL THE INFECTIONS IN THE TRIAL. (Which is why the confidence intervals are so large.)

https___bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_public_images_06c14cef-89a0-499e-aac8-ff754a3216af_1170x1257.jpg

SOURCE

Count the other 97 percent of the infections, and the vaccine was roughly 20 percent effective over the entire trial - far, far below what the FDA said was approvable in 2020. The confidence intervals went below zero for kids under two, meaning the possibility that the vaccine increased the risk of infection cannot be excluded. And cases of severe Covid - including one two-year-old who was hospitalized - were mostly in the mRNA group.

https___bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_public_images_b18a1b12-0aeb-4def-852f-69c838c3adeb_1170x550.jpg

And I’m not even talking about side effects; several kids had fevers above 104 degrees following the shots.

THIS CANNOT POSSIBLY BE APPROVABLE.

What is the FDA thinking?
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Infant Mortality vs Vaccines

Unread post by rachel »



screenshot-twitter.com-2022.07.07-18_34_37.png
Post Reply