^^^ Interesting video, Rachel.
Two points.
1. Once again we can see the similarities between the important 2009 pandemic dry run and the real thing in 2020. Where are politicians like the late Paul Flynn asking any kind of probing questions now?
2. At 3.30 note the appearance of John Ioannidis, who has been given publicity in the 2020 Coronavirus hoax. He seems to base his thoughts on the veracity of the "TESTS" for the Covid "virus".
More recently June 13 2020
https://www.thenationalherald.com/commu ... ow-434735/
It's pointless discussing the rate of death from "Covid-19" because the tests are useless and the cause of death is more than likely to be from several other causes.
Ioannidis rushed into the MSM on March 17 2020 with an estimate of the 'death rate' from Covid
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-f ... able-data/
[Sars Cov 2 back in those days]
It's a good article, though, based on minimal data, he relies on the staged Diamond Princess operation, a key part of setting up the fake pandemic
If the level of the epidemic does overwhelm the health system and extreme measures have only modest effectiveness, then flattening the curve may make things worse: Instead of being overwhelmed during a short, acute phase, the health system will remain overwhelmed for a more protracted period. That’s another reason we need data about the exact level of the epidemic activity.
One of the bottom lines is that we don’t know how long social distancing measures and lockdowns can be maintained without major consequences to the economy, society, and mental health. Unpredictable evolutions may ensue, including financial crisis, unrest, civil strife, war, and a meltdown of the social fabric. At a minimum, we need unbiased prevalence and incidence data for the evolving infectious load to guide decision-making.
In the most pessimistic scenario, which I do not espouse, if the new coronavirus infects 60% of the global population and 1% of the infected people die, that will translate into more than 40 million deaths globally, matching the 1918 influenza pandemic.
Most recently, August 6, here is Ioannidis again
his research "based only on studies of the prevalence of coronavirus antibodies" to determine death rates.
It's well worth reading, as he offers some perspective, albeit based on official sources.
"
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... 8-pandemic