Woe New Zealand

All topics related to Australia
antipodean
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Dan Picknell - Changes Made To The Police Sudden Death Reporting Form - Why?

Unread post by antipodean »



Image
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3872
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1362 times
Been thanked: 1646 times

Re: Woe New Zealand

Unread post by rachel »

https://x.com/jathorpmfm/status/1732517544752255279
Image
The FOI response that confirms this is true is here 👇
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/respon ... r.pdf.html
Your request for Official information, reference: HNZ00023978

Thank you for your email on 5 July 2023, asking for the following under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act):

“According to the legislation at the time in 2021, there were operational exemptions available for those who were not getting vaccinated against Covid 19. Your website outlines the process of applying for an operating exemption under clause 12a

Kindly share:
How many requests were received?
How many were approved by the ministry?”

From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of 478 applications for Significant Service Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, covering approximately 11,005 workers.

Please note that it is not possible to provide the exact number of workers that were covered by SSDs. This is because it was possible for an organisation to submit an application to cover more than one worker.
napoleon
Posts: 3954
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:23 pm
Has thanked: 1711 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Woe New Zealand

Unread post by napoleon »

even if the figure was ten percent of 11000 ,thats still a thousand or so politicians willing to allow propoganda on the public to push something they would not take ,actors your right all acts
antipodean
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Woe New Zealand

Unread post by antipodean »

Please note that it is not possible to provide the exact number of workers that were covered by SSDs. This is because it was possible for an organisation to submit an application to cover more than one worker.
It could be a lot more exemptions then the 11,005.
Post Reply