What THEY tell us in advance.

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

As brought to the Green Horizon Summit in London [Nov 9-11 2020] the KPGM Global Initiatives Leader, Michael Hayes, said that Covid-19 was a "dress-rehearsal" for the Climate Emergency,
Actually this warning is nothing new.

https://www.forumforthefuture.org/Blog/ ... -emergency
Covid-19: a dress rehearsal for the climate emergency?
by Sally Uren March 12 2020 [yes, the day after the "characterised pandemic" was declared.
Sally Uren Chief Executive at Forum for the Future with overall responsibility for delivering Forum’s mission to accelerate a big shift towards a sustainable future by catalysing transformational change in global systems.
note the headings...
It could be a catalyst for financial reform.
The current situation is already giving us clues as to how a response to a crisis can have potential positive impacts. Playing these forward, I think there are at least three ways in which COVID-19 might also help with the climate emergency.
It could be a catalyst for financial reform.

The virus could provide a compelling reason for global leaders to re-examine how the economy could function differently – taking into account natural assets for example – and accelerate economic change.

C-19 could shift societal behaviour, and norms, for the better.
Some of the emerging behaviour changes could also help us to bring global carbon emissions under control – such as the move towards remote working and conferencing and a changing attitude towards travel. If just some of these shifts to on-line and less travel endure post the C19-crisis, we will have made positive progress towards decarbonisation.

COVID-19 could help us be better at living with uncertainty, experimenting and learning.

A rehearsal for the future?


In many ways, we could see the virus as a dress rehearsal for the kinds of disruption we are set to see in the next decade, as we urgently transform entire systems to achieve carbon neutrality.

closely followed by the Guardian April 21 2020 from an Australian perspective by Dr John Hewson, former leader of the Liberal party and chair of the Commission for the Human Future
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... re-science
Coronavirus is a dress rehearsal for what awaits us if governments continue to ignore science
Covid-19 and the health and medical, economic and other responses it has engendered occurred faster, and much more substantively, that anyone had imagined. Most would never have envisaged the restraints enforced on personal freedoms and movements to contain the infection, nor the extent ]it would be required to “crash” economies to cushion these responses. But the world has mostly accepted and is adjusting to these needs.

Our political leaders are throwing ideology to the wind – and coming up with policies and fixes that put people before politics. This is an inspiring indication that the global community can embrace essential change....
....In developing policy solutions it is imperative that they be based on science and accepted evidence. This essential process should see the development of a “new science” – the science of human survival and wellbeing.
May 4 2020
https://ideas4development.org/en/covid- ... te-crisis/
COVID-19, A HUGE REHEARSAL FOR THE UPCOMING CLIMATE CRISIS?
by economist Étienne Espagne

https://ideas4development.org/en/covid- ... te-crisis/
Covid-19: a tipping point in the Capitalocene Era

-
Is the Covid-19 pandemic a dress rehearsal for a climate crisis that will occur very soon? Is it acting as a catalyst in the widespread realization of the systemic ecological weaknesses generated by our modes of development? Will this realization – if it takes place – be strong enough to trigger a transition to escape the prevailing financial, economic, and geopolitical structures?
The Covid-19 crisis as a metaphor for the climate crisis

Covid-19 and climate change: solutions in common

Covid-19 and climate change are also similar in terms of the collective nature of the response to be made. In both cases, individual interests must be more strongly subordinated to the public interest. For example, young people, who are less exposed to the dangers of Covid-19, do not necessarily understand why they might have to be quarantined. The government, or the collective community, must be able to exert influence on individual choices so that the public interest is guaranteed. The experience of Covid-19 shows that individual behavior can change very quickly in the face of a radical, imminent, and highly uncertain threat. The responses we need to climate change should follow a very similar approach, i.e. pre-eminence of the collective interest, even though the signals may seem, as we shall see, more dispersed and less imminent.


July 14 2020 - the World Built Environment Forum of the RICS [Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors
https://www.rics.org/uk/wbef/megatrends ... tastrophe/
A dress rehearsal for climate catastrophe?
A radical suite of economic and social policy responses to the Covid-19 crisis have slowed the pandemic in countries across the world. So where is the appetite for similarly radical policy action on climate change?
KPMG itself on September 7 2020
https://home.kpmg/uk/en/home/media/pres ... hange.html
Despite the postponement of COP26 in Glasgow, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have accelerated consideration of climate change and social responsibility putting pressure on companies and politicians to ‘build back better’ and focus on a green recovery
Simon Weaver, Co-Head of Climate Risk and Decarbonisation Strategy at KPMG UK, commented:

“Understanding the impacts on your business from climate change is no longer an ‘added extra’. It’s a core issue which we all, as corporate leaders, must respond to – not just from a wider purpose perspective, but crucially for the resilience of our own organisations. The Coronavirus pandemic was, to some extent, a dress-rehearsal for climate change.
here's Sally Uren again - almost 6 months after her amazing crystal ball gazing in March

How Covid-19 influenced the climate crisis - The Times & Sunday Times



Finally the UN Secretary General admits the same himself - September 21 2020
https://www.un.org/press/en/2020/sgsm20267.doc.htm
The pandemic is a crisis unlike any we have ever seen. But, it is also the kind of crisis that we will see in different forms again and again. COVID-19 is not only a wake-up call, it is a dress rehearsal for the world of challenges to come. We must move forward with humility, recognizing that a microscopic virus has brought the world to its knees.
Can it not be more obvious how this staged pandemic is being used to push the climate agenda through?
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Financial guru Robert Kiyosaki interviewed former national security advisor for the Pentagon and the CIA Jim Rickards recently [uploaded Nov 4 2020], who

says the pandemic has created a multi-generational shift in the economy and he believes the pandemic is not going away anytime soon. As a result, he’s making a prediction for gold to hit 15k by 2025.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Rickards
In The Road to Ruin : The Global Elites' Secret Plan for the Next Financial Crisis (2016), Rickards propagates the idea which was first articulated by the Indian economist Arvind Kumar in the Indian newspaper Daily News and Analysis and which rang the alarm bells that the combination of negative interest rates and cashless currency was a design to destroy the savings of people. The book also promulgates the conspiracy theory that "global elites" are using the "hobby horse" of climate change to advance a "new world order" that includes a global currency.
seems pretty mainstream stuff to anyone awake in November 2020!


The Coming Financial Crisis and the Return to Gold - Robert Kiyosaki, Kim Kiyosaki, and Jim Rickards

Go to 35:11
Go to pp 288-291 [in my recent 2019 book 'Aftermath: Seven Secrets of Wealth Preservation in the Coming Chaos ( July 2019)'] I say there will be a pandemic in the next three years and there will be social disorder and riots on the streets
well well well. Inside knowledge?

And here's his new book, January 14 2021
https://www.waterstones.com/book/the-ne ... 0593330272
The New Great Depression: Winners and Losers in a Post-Pandemic World (Hardback)
Image

I wonder when Jim started writing it.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

A big give-away from July 2019 from a Rockerfeller Fellow
go to 2:30


she's certain there's going to be a pandemic not if but when and it will kill within six months 33 million people in six months according to modellers at the Bellevue Washington state institute for Disease Modelling [same name as Neil Ferguson's crowd at Imperial College] Wendy Taylor describes it as being in Seattle** actually Bellevue WA [which "coincidentally" became the early epicentre for the coronavirus outbreak in the USA]
SARS MERS Ebola Zika ..."THIS IS OUR NEW NORMAL" she says. All experts say global pandemic is not a matter of IF but WHEN"


The World Bank reckons it will cost 3 trillion dollars, she says, going on to quote similar predictions from Bill Gates.

Wendy Taylor also mentions a strange organisation called "PLATFORM i" which has little exposure and a minimalist website
https://www.platformi.io/about
A global collaborative to transform our epidemic intelligence systems
so we can prevent and stop outbreaks in their tracks.

With new tools and capabilities emerging from the convergence of genomics, data science and data technology, cutting edge projects are now demonstrating the potential power of outbreak analytics to enhance epidemic intelligence. To harness these advances, we need to strategically align investment around a shared, long-term vision and common set of priorities.
Where did that disappear to?

Here's the IDM -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute ... e_Modeling
Institute for Disease Modeling is an institute within the Global Good Fund, controlled by Intellectual Ventures and Bill and Melinda Gates. It specializes in mathematical modelling of infectious disease. As of 2014, its models included malaria, polio and HIV (with EMOD), and they released their source code to the public. In 2020, its COVID-19 model "Covasim" was used to guide decision-making during in the COVID-19 pandemic in Oregon and in Washington State, gaining national attention. The institute is located in Bellevue, Washington.
podcast - https://thispodcastwillkillyou.com/2020 ... -modeling/

** Here's an interesting participant from Seattle at Event 201 who wrote it up quickly, Gabrielle Fitzgerald of Panorama
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lets-wai ... ticle_view
october 24 2019
Gabrielle Fitzgerald
Founder and CEO, Panorama at Panorama Global

I joined Event 201 last week, a half-day pandemic simulation hosted by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in New York. Thank you to Tom Inglesby for leading such a thought-provoking exercise, and thanks to Ryan C. Morhard of World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for sponsoring!
March 14 2020
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/social-d ... ticle_view
As you probably know, I have been working in global health for more than two decades (embarrassing to admit that I have been doing anything that long!). You might remember that in 2014 I ran a philanthropic initiative to respond to the West Africa Ebola outbreak. And my organization, Panorama, has been working on various aspects of the Coronavirus response since January. Through all of this, I have the privilege of working closely with top officials at the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and many other public health experts around the world.

Based on all of this, I am writing to urge you to take Coronavirus seriously, and to do so immediately. While this week’s school closures and cancellation of sports events seems to have now gotten people’s attention, I am still finding a significant lack of understanding about what additional immediate changes people need to take to protect yourself and your family.

In short: [Avoid coming in to contact with other human beings.
PANORAMA GLOBAL with an all-female board/cast
https://panoramaglobal.org/
We call ourselves an action tank. Our goal is to achieve maximum social impact by partnering with visionary leaders to co-develop solutions to hard problems.
Accelerate. Catalyze. Empower.
We are about driving impact – to enable people to thrive, safeguard the planet, and improve productivity, at home and around the world.

Tedros must "modernise" the WHO's engagement with the world - Gabrielle in 2017
https://web.archive.org/web/20170726043 ... ngagement/

Good gracious.


BTW here's Neil Ferguson 's annual report in 2016...
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperi ... 015-16.pdf
Evolution of Influenza
Through a new collaboration supported by a Wellcome Trust Collaborator Award, Steven Riley and colleagues will simultaneously study virus evolution and transmissibility through improved experimental designs, mathematical models, and genetic sequencing. Information gained will enhance pandemic preparedness by identifying which animal viruses are most likely to cause the next pandemic, and aid the choice of viruses to be included in the annually updated seasonal flu vaccine.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

The you will own nothing in 2030 speculation from Nov 2016 by young global leader IDA AUKEN has become mainstream in late 2020.

Auken was an early advocate of the CIRCULAR ECONOMY. Here's the WEF spinning wheel on the topic, a very busy, interconnected topic.
https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics ... blications

and promoted at the January 2020 Davos jamboree
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/ ... it-happen/

But it goes back to October 2014
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/10/ ... ida-auken/
We all know that the current linear economic model is not sustainable. Materials are extracted, manufactured into products and then discarded into landfill – it’s a system that wastes valuable resources, causes environmental damage and will make it near impossible to satisfy the demands of the 3 billion new consumers in developing nations, who are expected to join the middle class by 2030.

The concept of the circular economy is about decoupling growth from resource consumption – and maximizing the positive environmental, economic and social effects....The circular economy is about new business models that have shifted from selling products to selling services
[youtube]I123ks_eWzI[/youtube]

And along comes the coronavirus reset... but all the companies selling services are being sent to the wall as the giants increase their selling of "products".

Ida Auken's twitter feed came to a halt just before the "characterised pandemic" was declared on 3/11.... interesting!
Where has she gone? Not even a presence on the WEF "Cities of Tomorrow" panel
https://www.weforum.org/communities/gfc ... f-tomorrow

And guess who's produced the Circular Economy handbook? Accenture, a Strategic Partner of the World Economic Forum who also helped bring us the Digital Transformation:
Powering the Great Reset of the WEF
JULY 2020
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Digita ... t_2020.pdf

https://www.accenture.com/gb-en/about/e ... y-handbook

Image

Accenture at Davos 2020 - stakeholder capitalism just waiting for a pandemic to come along... inclusion, diversity, sustainability... [try not to vomit]
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Does this guy, Chris Martenson sound like an insider? Or did he guess well?
January 27 2020 [before the WHO even declared a PHEIC] on Jan 30

Coronavirus: Scientist Warns of Biggest Risk In 100 Years - Chris Martenson & Mike Maloney
in which he describes how asymptomatic transmission will be decisive and how it was following a movie script, emphasising the Chinese narrative. He's preaching hygiene like Fauci. Hmmm
"This is the most serious pandemic risk that we've seen, not since SARS...but I think since the Spanish Flu outbreak in 1919."
Well well well

He knows this is the black swan with a big shutdown...

Followed up a month later, Feb 28 2020


Could Coronavirus Trigger the Monetary Reset? Mike Maloney & Chris Martenson (Part 2)
Did someone say RESET?
This is Maloney's interjection -
This is going to be an incredible disaster ...could be a complete collapse of the economic system...the WHOs and CDCs fault it got so bad"
This was before governments started creating money on a monumental scale...and certainly will last well into Spring 2021. So the evil day of reckoning is delayed. The meltdown of Lehman Brothers was announced after it had happened without warning...

But we know the WHO and CDC are only acting under orders.

,
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

xileffilex wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 10:01 am Following a link on the Owl Queen youtube channel, pointing to an outpouring from Deutsche Bank..

Update from Deutsche Bank November 11 2020 [h/t Kate Wand yt channel]
from Eric Heymann at DB
https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN- ... PAu1aPpA==
A certain degree of eco-dictatorship will be necessary
The impact of the current climate policy on people’s everyday lives is still
quite abstract and acceptable for many households...[whose] decisions tend to be made on the basis of our income, not on climate
consideration... we need to change our behaviour in all these areas of life. This is simply because there are no adequate cost-effective technologies yet to allow us to maintain our living standards in a carbon-neutral way.
in addition to increased carbon pricing, one ...
option is to tighten regulatory law considerably. I know that “eco- dictatorship” is a nasty word. But we may have to ask
ourselves the question whether and to what extent we may be willing to accept some kind of eco-dictatorship (in the form of regulatory law) in order to move towards climate neutrality.
willing to accept law which is imposed, as seen throughout the world in 2020? It's obvious why people are being masked up for a non-existent pandemic.


Orinally published in Konzept # 19: What we must do to rebuild

https://www.dbresearch.com/servlet/rewe ... 0000513730
This edition of Konzept presents our ideas for how economies, businesses, and societies should rebuild from the pandemic.
https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN- ... rtFNVM7w==
This is the first issue of Konzept since 13 May - <a href="https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN- ... Cg==">LIFE AFTER COVID-19</a>


Contents
07 Summaries
11 To save capitalism we must help the young
16 Don’t waste the crisis: How to address Europe’s challenges for
the next decade
22 The fundamental right to connectivity
26 Better business post-covid: Lessons from luxury
32 A work-from-home tax
35 China: Green finance to green transition
40 Do not write the eulogy for shopping malls
42 How company actions on equality must change post-covid
46 The tough choice to create a hydrogen economy
49 The steps required to promote digital currencies
53 A new approach to US monetary policy
57 The delivery dilemma
60 How big companies must respond to localisation
64 As labour markets adapt, so too should fiscal policy
66 How the pandemic highlights the path to agility
70 Climate neutrality: Are we ready for an honest discussion?
74 The case for post-covid rural investment
78 How to avoid zombie cities


Some interesting reading matter there.


Actually the May 13 edition #18 of Deutsche Bank's Konzept gives the game away only two months after the "characterised pandemic" was declared...
Lessons from the corona crisis for climate protection policy: new technology and adaptation promise better success than sacrifices
The covid-19 crisis has shown that people accept major restrictions laid down in regulatory law if there is an acute threat.
At the same time, the global debate about easing the lockdown also shows that acceptance of such measures wanes over time as the threat recedes.
We do not believe that people in western democracies will accept similar constraints of everyday life for climate-protection purposes in the coming years.
First the threat perceived at the individual level is not sufficiently acute, second, people feel they can adapt to climate change over time, and third, every citizen and even every country can make only a small contribution to climate protection. Like it or not, most people simply will not be willing to make sacrifices if others do not.

The covid-19 crisis has also shown that millions of jobs hinge on everyday activities and luxuries which are currently [sic] which may appear superfluous at first sight. Due to its significant economic impact, it is impossible to fight the virus simply by a continued lockdown of the economy. In the long run, new technologies are the only option. ** In the coronavirus context, these new technologies take the form of efficient drugs and vaccines, which are currently being researched around the world.
In the meantime, we can only try to contain the virus by ensuring good hygiene, relying on social distancing etc. In addition, we need to adapt to
the virus – at least for now. In some respects, the corona crisis is a blueprint for climate protection policy. In that area, too, we need
better technologies than those available today. We need high-performance, low-carbon, controllable and cheap sources of energy which permit
climate-friendly growth. That is what the world’s best minds should focus on in the coming years.
Most people will be unwilling to accept persistent, massive growth losses and/or restrictions on individual consumption and production choices for climate reasons ** in the long run. The near-term costs are simply too high. So, as long as the necessary technology is not available, we will have to try and slow climate change by using the tools available today and accept that
** which may also be interpreted as new technologies for human control - what people are allowed to do by governments using smart systems
*** this assumes democratic systems not eco-dictatorships
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Here comes UBI on the back of the coronavirus shutdowns...proposed for the Northern Ireland regional laboratory of the UN....
https://web.archive.org/web/20201129080 ... d-55076794
Universal basic income proposed for NI
Nov 29 2020
Universal basic income (UBI) has been proposed as a potential way of future-proofing for any society-wide event.

It is something that has operated in other countries, but has not yet been seen in the UK.
other countries is actually Finland..
From January 2017 until December 2018, 2,000 unemployed Finns got a monthly flat payment of €560 (£490; $634).
I guess Klaus Schwab would love the farm animals to live on that.

The headline was subsequently changed, without altering the rest of the text to
Benefits: Should Stormont give money to everyone in NI?
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

The 2021 phase of the plandemic was introduced in summer 2020 - the mutation of the non-virus.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/07 ... -dangerous
July 14 2020
t’s only a tiny change. At some point early in the pandemic, one of the 30,000 letters in the genome of SARS-CoV-2 changed from an A to a G. Today, that mutation, at position 23,403, has spread around the world. It is found in the vast majority of newly sequenced viruses and has become the center of a burning scientific question: Has the mutation become so common because it helps the virus spread faster? Or is it just coincidence?.....it changed the virus’ spike, the protein on its surface that attaches to human cells. The mutation changed the amino acid at position 614 of the spike from an aspartic acid (abbreviated D) to a glycine (G), which is why it’s called G614.

aha, so the "vaccines" developed will have been designed for the wrong spike...

also in the article...
The United Kingdom’s COVID-19 Genomics Consortium has sequenced 30,000 SARS-CoV-2 genomes,

so...they must have had 30,000 purified sample of 'virus' with no other contaminants?


leading to the BBC showing the likely course of the hoax
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-5332577
July 18 2020
Coronavirus: Are mutations making it more infectious?
At the New York Genome Center and New York University, Prof Neville Sanjana...[and] .His team edited a [Wuhan D614] virus so that it had this alteration to the spike protein and pitted it against a real Sars-CoV-2 virus from the early Wuhan outbreak, without the mutation, in human tissue cells. The results, he believes, prove the mutated virus is more transmissible than the original version, at least in the lab.
[color="red] In fact, the D614G variant is so dominant, it is now the pandemic.[/color]
"New variant" D614G mutation became "the dominant form" of the virus by March 2020
https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/covid ... -mutating/
December 9 2020
Thankfully, SARS-CoV-2 mutates very slowly. Because of this, it is likely that our new treatments will continue to be effective and that the behaviour of the virus will not dramatically change over the coming months
So what's the latest narrative for the 'virus', leading to Christmas and New Year shutdowns in London and SE England with attempts to coerce people into only meeting one on one outdoors only [no doubt excluding celeb sports...]?
https://www.essexlive.news/news/essex-n ... ce-4815376
December 19 2020
During his press conference, Boris Johnson revealed that a new mutated version of coronavirus was to blame for an increase in cases.
The new strain, which is believed to have started in Kent, is not believed to be any more dangerous if contracted.**
However, it is believed to spread a lot easier.
The Prime Minister revealed that evidence has suggested that the new strain could be up to 70 per cent more transmittable.
How long will it take for people to wake up as the telegraphed story line gets more and more crazy, diverging further and further from reality? Naturally this "new strain" is totally innocuous, ** since they won't be able to produce a massive increase in old people dying this time. Shut the place down for a belief which produces nothing. No doubt the "sound" SAGE advice will be published in due course, the fake science the corrupt government desired.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

More details on the fraud known as the mutating Covid-sars-cov2 "virus", from our friends at the BBC...

Dec 20 2020
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55388846
So how has it gone from being non-existent to the most common form of the virus in parts of England in a matter of months?

It is rapidly replacing other versions of the virus
It has mutations that affect part of the virus likely to be important
Some of those mutations have already been shown in the lab to increase the ability of the virus to infect cells
All of these come together to build a case for a virus that can spread more easily.
So how do we know this? [which is advising our venal politicians]
Mathematicians...
Mathematicians have been running the numbers on the spread of different variants in an attempt to calculate how much of an edge this one might have.

But teasing apart what is due to people's behaviour and what is due to the virus is hard.

The figure mentioned by Prime Minister Boris Johnson was that the variant may be up to 70% more transmissible. He said this may be increasing the R number - which indicates if an epidemic is growing or shrinking - by 0.4.

That 70% number appeared in a presentation by Dr Erik Volz, from Imperial College London, on Friday.

During the talk he said: "It is really too early to tell… but from what we see so far it is growing very quickly, it is growing faster than [a previous variant] ever grew, but it is important to keep an eye on this."

There is no "nailed on" figure for how much more infectious the variant may be. Scientists, whose work is not yet public, have told me figures both much higher and much lower than 70%.
Will vaccines work stil? Naturally, you don't want people saying they won't be jabbed at this point....
Here's the new scare story for 2021, all part of taking the script forward
If the new variant means more people are infected more quickly, that would in turn lead to more people needing hospital treatment.
anything else to worry yourself sick about? Surely!
"But if we let it add more mutations, then you start worrying," said Prof Gupta.

"This virus is potentially on a pathway for vaccine escape, it has taken the first couple of steps towards that."

Vaccine escape happens when the virus changes so it dodges the full effect of the vaccine and continues to infect people.

This may be the most concerning element of what is happening with the virus.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

All going to plan for the controllers - based on this flimsy speculation that there's a "new variant" virus, and agile shutdowns which were announced after parliament had been sent home, UK borders with France have been sealed flights cancelled to many countries. Maximum disruption and more conditioning for the animals on the farm.
Post Reply