What THEY tell us in advance.

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

From McKinsey
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-funct ... ting-model
How COVID-19 is redefining the next-normal operating model
December 10, 2020
On February 12, 2020, just two weeks into his tenure and before there were even a dozen reported cases of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom, BP CEO Bernard Looney spoke to a live audience at London’s Royal Lancaster Hotel and laid out an ambitious reframing of the energy giant’s mission as “Reimagining energy for people and our planet.”1 Climate change was a reality, Looney said, andthe world would soon invest “trillions of dollars” in “replumbing and rewiring the global energy system.” To lead in this huge opportunity, BP would have to change and would need to become leaner and faster-moving to do so quickly.
Just one of the big change at the top of large corporations immediately before the plandemic.
Then, at the Annual Meeting of BP on May 27...
Looney said, the pandemic had reinforced the company’s commitment to its new mission: “The more we understand the current situation, the more I am convinced that the decisions we took in February are rightfor three reasons: increasing uncertainty surrounding the future demand for oil—and volatility in oil markets; increasing awareness of the fragility of the world we live in—and of the opportunities to build back better, greener and more resilient
embracing pandemic-led change... a remarkable window of opportunity..
Conclusion.... the big clearout which is a re-statement of the Schwab doctrine
How to turn COVID-19 shifts into permanent operating-model change
For many, there is simply no justification for returning to the old ways of doing business. The very strongest companies are already acting on this opportunity to reinvent themselves with deliberation and speed. Companies reacting with less urgency are soon likely to find themselves outpaced.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

xileffilex wrote: Sun Dec 20, 2020 3:41 pm More details on the fraud known as the mutating Covid-sars-cov2 "virus", from our friends at the BBC...

Dec 20 2020
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55388846
New coronavirus variant: What do we know?
Here's the advice [summary only....] which suspiciously emerged which prompted the SE of England being locked down [ho ho] and the UK being cut off temporarily from the rest of the world for 48h, so it seems...[aka stress test] with PCR tests [kerrrching!] for border crossings to France for French citizens "trapped" in the UK... ....
ImageImage
Source - Sky News, which brought us those phoney hospital scenes from Northern Italy back in Spring.
Sam Coates Sky @SamCoatesSky
This is the NERVTAG paper in full which was presented to PM on Friday.

It’s a grim and challenging document - a variant which spreads faster, could massively raise the R and there is so much we don’t know all laid bare here
3:49 pm · 20 Dec 2020·
LOL! Just another routine piece of scaremongering propaganda from the modellers. VUI202012/01 my arse. A viral load of old vui-phooey. I guess the three papers which NERVTAG considered won't be made public just yet so nobody can pick holes in them.

Nu Vui can "be challenging to sequence" Who writes this stuff?

VUI = Variant Under Investigation i.e. variant being hoaxed.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Update on the "new variant" of the hoax.
Last American Vagabond has posted on this brazen narrative continuation
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com ... -lockdown/
Another Flawed Data Model From Imperial College To Blame For Latest UK Lockdown

Of course, this new variant knows no borders and will spread out from SE England through the developed world....[although the fake virus does actually seem to stop at some borders - witness the huge differences between alleged Covid-19 deaths between Spain & Portugal, Germany and its neighbours, Bulgaria and Greece.... Czech Republic and its neighbours]
Image
source - Wikipedia - deaths per 100,000
obviously each country has different methods of recording deaths, different age profiles of its population and had different approaches to emptying hospitals, so in effect such comparisons are meaningless.

The black box data which the UK government took on board entire after an undisclosed 10 minute presentation to NERVTAG by Volz of Imperial College, is the new Wuhan moment.
Another key player in the hoax, also from Imperial, is one Wendy Barclay who added the additional scare story:
Earlier strains of coronavirus found it harder

to infect children than adults, with one explanation being that children have fewer of the doorways called the ACE2 receptor the virus uses to enter a human body's cells.

Professor Wendy Barclay, from Nervtag and Imperial College London, said the mutations to the virus appeared to be making it easier to breach those doorways.
i.e. another " hey kids, don't you kill your grandma now" news angle to scare the elderly and brainwash families.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55406939
Dec 22 2020
She said this could be putting children on a "more level playing field" with adults as the virus was "less inhibited" in children.

Prof Barclay said: "Therefore children are equally susceptible, perhaps, to this virus as adults, and therefore given their mixing patterns, you would expect to see more children being infected."
A nice photo of masked schoolchildren is used to illustrate the article and no doubt this "discovery" will be used to keep children masked up in schools, even very young ones.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Jeremy Grantham benefactor of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change [!] reckons the crash is coming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYfmRTyl56w
He's the same age as Klaus Schwab and has poured millions into Imperial College for their work on climate science.

What IS interesting is that the Grantham Institute were very keen by the end of April 2020 that the Covid-crisis was a kick start for the transition to a net zero carbon system
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/grantham/pub ... vid-19.php
A COP26 Universities Network Briefing

This briefing identifies key recovery policies that the UK government could introduce to both respond to the crisis of COVID-19, and support the country in meeting its commitment to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050.

It has been produced in association with the COP26 Universities Network, a growing group of more than 30 UK-based universities working together to help deliver an ambitious outcome at the UN Climate Summit in Glasgow and beyond.
Another example of an organisation so sure [ one month before Schwab came out of the closet with the Great Reset] that things were NOT going back to business as usual.
Economic growth will be a high priority for all countries in the months and years following COVID-19. The transition to net-zero emissions can significantly contribute to the recovery.
Lessons can be learnt from the recovery packages introduced following the 2008 financial crisis, but the COVID-19 crisis is structurally different on the demand and supply side......
Quoted paper MAY 4 2020
https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/public ... r20-01.pdf
A net-zero emissions economic recovery from COVID-19
The COVID-19 post-pandemic economic slowdown is likely to be different in nature to the GFC of 2008....

The economic impact of the pandemic, and the measures taken to deliberately close down economic activity to prevent contagion ***, is estimated at £2.4 billion per day in the UK alone.
By the time the pandemic is deemed mostly under control, both demand and supply capacity will have taken a knock.
lol!

*** suuuuuure they're giving the game away here.
Tackling both the COVID-19 response and net-zero objectives will require an unprecedented mobilisation of resources.....

The Climate Change Emergency Committee (CCEC) is a renamed version of the existing
Cabinet Committee on Climate Change, which was announced in October 2019 but had its
first meeting in March 2020. The membership of the committee has still not been published....The CCEC will oversee and coordinate the Net Zero Delivery Plan and the Net Zero Delivery Body
Seems like everything was teed up in 2019.
The UK could catalyse global coordination by establishing a Sustainable Recovery Alliance (SRA) at COP 26...

The UK should serve as co-chair. China may be a natural partner to work with the UK in establishing and growing the alliance. The Chinese recovery is expected to happen first, and decisions made in the recovery package are likely to influence the upcoming 14th Five-Year Plan. Therefore, there is significant impetus for the UK and China to collaborate in the context of COP 26 to promote mutually beneficial sustainable recovery packages focused on long-run environmental issues and achieving net zero.
supported by the Downforce Trust

The briefing paper for COP26 which will happen in Glasgow UK now in late 2021
https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk:8443/bits ... VID-19.pdf
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

What is the Downforce trust which supports Oxford University? Run by Adam Parr ***
https://www.downforce.com/
The drawdown of carbon dioxide from earth’s atmosphere is the most urgent and essential step in arresting and reversing global heating.

2. Nature has the solutions. We do not need to delay.

3. The Downforce Trust is working with a world-class team to create EcoBalanceⓇ, an app connecting land stewards and financial institutions.

We are also proud to have supported Oxford University research on the economics of building back better

.

yes it did - dated May 5 2020!
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-05-05-bu ... growth-and
Building back better: Green COVID-19 recovery packages will boost economic growth and stop climate change


And here's another working paper from Oxford on May 4
https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/public ... r20-02.pdf
Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?

Surveys were sent out by Stiglitz and others on April 15 2020
You have been identified as an expert in fiscal policy based on your status as an expert in economics/finance. Our objective is to elicit your assessment and recommendations on fiscal policies in response to COVID-19 to help guide significant government spending, by G20
and other national governments.
The output of the survey is intended to be published in a commissioned paper by the Oxford Review of Economic Policy


Once again, they knew we weren't going back because of a flu outbreak.
The report authors hope that countries will seize this generational opportunity to incorporate climate criteria into national plans – for their economies and the environment.

According to Professor Hepburn, 'The COVID-19-initiated emissions reduction could be short-lived. But this report shows we can build back better, keeping many of the recent improvements we’ve seen in cleaner air, returning nature and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.’


Emily Shuckburgh, Director of Cambridge Zero, University of Cambridge says, ‘Shaping the national and global recovery from the coronavirus pandemic in a way that supports the response to climate change and other environmental threats simply makes sense...

Dave Reay, Professor and Chair in Carbon Management & Education and Executive Director of Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Innovation, University of Edinburgh says, ‘Covid-19 is falling like a daily hammer blow on our economy, putting the livelihoods and employment prospects of many millions at risk. By aggressive investment in green skills and the creation of a swathe of green economy employment opportunities the UK can buffer COVID-19’s impacts and simultaneously deliver a safer climate future.
That's quite enough evidence for the climate science part of the engineered reset.


***Adam Parr is an Anglo-French businessman and former chairman and chief executive of the Williams Formula One team.

Adam chairs Oxford Semantic Technologies Limited, a spin-out of the Department of Computer Science at the University of Oxford, and The Downforce Trust, a UK charity dedicated to accelerating the carbon drawdown.

Adam is Adjunct Professor at the University of Western Australia, a director of Apolitical, and has a venture capital fund with investments in machine-learning, bio-mechanical technology and engineering.

Adam is the author of two books about Formula One: The Art of War – Five Years in Formula One; and co-author, with Ross Brawn, of Total Competition – Lessons in Strategy from Formula One. His academic study, The Mandate of Heaven — Strategy, Revolution, and the First European Translation of Sunzi’s Art of War (1772) was published by Brill in November 2019.

Adam was born in London in 1965. He holds an MA from Cambridge University and a PhD from UCL University of London
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

HaHa Biden launched in May 2021 an investigation into the origins of the SarsCov2 "virus", i.e. whether it was an engineered bioweapon [lol!] and they are telling us that the results will be inconclusive....
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02366-0
The government’s senior intelligence officer, Avril Haines, warned of this outcome on 30 June, in an interview with Yahoo News.
And so it came to pass on August 24
. Intelligence agencies were divided on whether the pandemic most likely began because of a laboratory accident, or because of human contact with an infected animal. The only strong conclusion is that the coronavirus was not developed as a biological weapon...
When in fact the virus was simulated on a computer and the plandemic created by killing off the old and sick. Standard misdirection for the gullible.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by rachel »



FMjjD86WUAU52HF.jpg
FMnMMPVVQAE_5BU.jpg
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by rachel »



Confidential Documents suggest Moderna created its Coronavirus Vaccine BEFORE Covid-19 was known to exist; & further evidence suggests Moderna actually made SARS-CoV-2 in a Lab
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/29/confi ... -pandemic/
The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Councel. Both signautres were made on December 17th 2019.

All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of “unknown cause”.

It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the alleged resultant disease dubbed COVID-19. So why was an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate developed by Moderna being transferred to the University of North Carolina on December 12th 2019?

The same Moderna that have had an mRNA coronavirus vaccine authorised for emergency use only in both the United Kingdom and United States to allegedly combat Covid-19.

What did Moderna know that we didn’t? In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine, and to be honest, the evidence suggests there hasn’t actually been a singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity throughout 2020, 2021, or 2022 either.

Could it have something to do with the fact that Moderna may actually be responsible for creating the Covid-19 virus?

On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... ements.pdf
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by rachel »

Nov 2019 and Event 201.



LOCKSTEP

Sunshineuk
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 6:17 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by Sunshineuk »

They tell us EVERYTHING in advance. The fact that we would be in a permanent state of alert is no surprise. If Events 201 is to believed they will eventually announce the end to THIS pandemic but the next will be just around the corner. They'll just have to think of a better name than "monkey'pox"
Post Reply