What THEY tell us in advance.

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

^^^^ a great way to get a controlled spike in "infections". in any case, nobody can verify however many or few tests are done or how many are positive or negative. It could easily be simulated to produce the correct "curve".

How does anyone get infected with Corony in any case? And what would the symptoms be to show you have been "infected"?

The vouchers can't be redeemed online, apparently. So no extra boost for Amazon. But only at two football clubs' stores, Spurs and Liverpool How non-inclusive is that? LOL!
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

This Walport clown is not the only one pushing the idea that we are teetering on the edge of "losing control" of the situation [where nobody is sick]
Here's another Quisling with the same script
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... s-12070680

Peter Openshaw, a professor of experimental medicine at Imperial College London, told Sophy Ridge On Sunday the public "must act fast" to stop the spread of coronavirus.

He said: "I think everyone is in agreement that we really need to act very quickly now in order to prevent this from growing exponentially and that's the main point, is that we must act fast because it is so much harder to get this sort of thing under control if you delay even a few days.

"This is potentially going to be quite dangerous now at this particular moment."
He added: "But if we don't do this now we are going to be right back in hard lockdown in short order, that's the only way we have at the moment for controlling this but there are other things on the horizon.
what does he mean by that? No supine journalist is going to ask him to clarify.

These sell-outs make their living from this scaremongering and who knows where they get their research grants from.

Rather like Neil Ferguson of Imperial Scaremongering College [yes, the same] who though that things were so dangerous at a particular earlier moment that 500,000 people were going to drop dead in the UK.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

The World Bank expects the pandemic to last until 2025, by which time we will have been able to vaccinate the whole world.
https://twitter.com/MissMar65525713/sta ... 9153231875
Covid-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Program

April 2020 to March 31 2025
Image

and...
https://twitter.com/i/events/1305500891349356544
Adar Poonawalla, CEO of the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer **, says that not enough COVID-19 vaccines will be available to inoculate the global population until at least the end of 2024.
** the Serum Institute of India.

Oh, I'm gutted!
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Following a link on the Owl Queen youtube channel, pointing to an outpouring from Deutsche Bank..

https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN- ... %29_gr.pdf
Jan 13 2020
. It also seems that a tipping point has recently been reached in the public awareness of the impact humans are having on the environment, and action is increasingly being sought. However, we think we will soon enter a stage where there will be a realisation of the immense economic and personal trade-offs we will collectively have to make in order to hit climate targets. Such sacrifices may shock citizens and be difficult to administer in democracies.
Will human progress be stalled or reversed if we decide that tackling the environment is the priority over growth?
....

... growth and pollution do not have to be linked.
One avenue for growth is to take advantage of new technologies. Indeed, there is reason to hope that if the world is on the cusp of a fourth Industrial Revolution one of artificial intelligence – then technological advancements could reach a point over the coming decade where they begin to be implemented at a rapid pace.
This could also help reverse the hard-to-explain dip in productivity growth over the last few decades
This paper was announced ahead of Davos 2020, to be taken there.
https://www.db.com/company/en/davos--th ... -forum.htm
https://www.db.com/newsroom_news/2020/n ... -11449.htm
They're basically telling us that national democracies will be overridden for the 'collective interest'

Here's Deutsche Bank's statement at the Eurofi European Banking Forum 9-11 Sept 2020, closed to the media
https://www.db.com/newsroom_news/Stefan ... ndemic.pdf
The COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated the resilience of the European financial system in the face of extraordinary challenges.
That design [de-levereging following the 2008 reset] had not envisaged a situation like that of the COVID-19 pandemic. A fire sale of
assets and lending freeze now could result in impairments for banks, harming the economy and undermining the resilience of the sector as a whole.
let's see how that pans out, considering society as a whole.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Irish Times October 2 2020
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland ... -1.4370626
Dr [Michael] Ryan *** predicted the world is in “for a hell of a ride for the next eight or nine months” as it awaits a vaccine, but he cautioned that a vaccine will “not be a silver bullet, but an additional tool that should be added to a comprehensive strategy to fight this disease”. ****

Dr Ryan said he was “somewhat cynical or at least depressed at the prospect of whether the world will wake up and we will actually see that epidemics are yet another consequence of our poor planetary and ecosystem management.
suuuuure

***This is the same Ryan of the WHO who
said that "they may have to start entering people's homes and remove family members affected due to Coronavirus".
which was "factchecked" to remove any reference to "forcefully" which of course he never said, but that's how fact checkers work. Obviously 'family members' will naturally comply through their inbuilt communitarianism....
https://www.republicworld.com/fact-chec ... check.html

**** it is not a disease. it is a imaginary construct. The common cold, influenza are not diseases either, for that matter.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Mass testing of the population planned [UK] - "leak" to the British Medical Journal 9/9/2020 OPERATION MOONSHOT

Is it a deliberate leak to soften the shock or a leak by a disgruntle member of the government ** who has to go along with the groupthink?

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3520?utm

Question - how did it "emerge"? Seems like the Scottish Govt were roped into this "leak"....
A briefing memo sent to the first minister and cabinet secretaries in Scotland, seen by The BMJ, says that the UK-wide Moonshot programme is expected to “cost over £100bn to deliver.” If achieved, the programme would allow testing of the entire UK population each week.

A separate PowerPoint presentation prepared for the government by the global management consulting firm Boston Consulting Group, also seen by The BMJ, says the plans had the potential to grow the UK’s testing capacity from the current 350 000 a day to up to 10 million tests a day by early 2021.

Firms named are GSK for supplying tests, AstraZeneca for laboratory capacity, and Serco and G4S for logistics and warehousing.

Under the plan the government will roll out testing in workplaces, entertainment venues, and football stadiums and at GP surgeries, pharmacies, schools, and other local sites to improve access. It will also roll out digital immunity passports to allow people who test negative to return to workplaces, travel, and participate in other activities.

Tweeted by the BMJ 3:25 PM BST. "just before the No. 10 press breifing.... ****
https://twitter.com/bmj_latest/status/1 ... 7012134912

At which committee was this briefing memo discussed? Who was present? They won't tell us, nobody is curious.

AT 15:43 GMT = 16:43 BST - the first cache of the PM's moonshot speech, September 9 2020. ****

Only on September 11 did the BMJ flesh out the detail in the documents they already had by the 9th , lol!

What is a digital passport?
Testing for access to certain spaces features heavily in the documents, with reference to “immunity/virus free passports,” likely to be available through an app. The plans say that testing could be used to “give people assurance that, at least for a limited time, they are unlikely to have the virus ***and are at low risk of transmitting it to others.”

What reason does the government give for Moonshot?
The documents state that the objective of the mass testing programme is to “utilise the full range of testing approaches and technologies to help reduce the R rate, keep the economy open and enable a return to normal life ***” They say that Moonshot has been described by the prime minister as the “only hope for avoiding a second national lockdown before a vaccine, something that the country cannot afford.”
*** which they have said isn't going to happen.
So, a deliberate leak. They could have told us all this BEFORE the speech. The BMJ don't say when they had this "leak", and they seemed to release it SIMULTANEOUSLY with Boris Johnson's speech. All in it together.
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/ ... ember-2020

*** perhaps only for a day!

**** The speech seemed to start at 16:00 hrs Sept 9 from the BBC live coverage. Simultaneous leak and press briefing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-54083725/page/3
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Chris Whitty, UK Chief Medical Officer:
reported in Guardian April 22 2020
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ays-whitty
Social distancing will be needed until at least the end of the year to prevent fresh outbreaks of coronavirus even though the UK has reached the peak of the current epidemic, the government’s chief medical officer has said.

Prof Chris Whitty, the UK’s most senior medic, said it was important to be realistic that “highly disruptive” social distancing would need to be in place for “really quite a long period of time”.

“If people are hoping it’s suddenly going to move from where we are in lockdown to where suddenly into everything is gone, that is a wholly unrealistic expectation.

“We are going to have to do a lot of things for really quite a long period of time, the question is what is the best package and this is what we’re trying to work out.

If you release more on one area, you have to keep on board more of another area so there’s a proper trade-off and this is what ministers are having to consider.”
Nothing to do with any virus. The script in plain sight 6 months ago.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

Here come the psientists to tell us how bad it's going to be this winter in the N. Hemisphere. They make a tidy living out of researching and modelling 'viruses', so it's good for business to stoke up fear.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02972-4
October 23 2020
“This virus is going to have a heyday,” says David Relman, a microbiologist at Stanford University in California. “We are looking at some pretty sobering and difficult months ahead.”

If SARS-CoV-2 can survive better in cold conditions, it’s still difficult to disentangle that contribution from the effect of people’s behaviour, says Kathleen O’Reilly, a mathematical epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “Flu has been around for hundreds of years and the specific mechanism as to why you have peaks of flu in the winter is still poorly understood" says O’Reilly
it's not surprising the virus will have a great winter - the governments are already conflating 'deaths with covid' with normal flu deaths for statistical purposes. But the idiots won't see through that and the news headlines will be predictable.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

The latest wheeze they've come up with to scare the young [who never seem to die from "Coronavirus" is LONG COVID which appears to be a rehash of what is described as "post-viral syndrome". Anyway, it's a good way to scare people. Obviously if you're in your mid 80s or older, it wont' be covid for very long, that being the brutal reality of respiratory infections in late age.

https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedrevie ... h-covid19/
Living with Covid19 - from the
National Institute for Health Research
Published on 15 October 2020
doi: 10.3310/themedreview_41169
NIHR is the nation's largest funder of health and care research and provides the people, facilities and technology that enables research to thrive. NIHR Evidence is managed by NIHR with a funding contribution from Health and Care Research Wales, Welsh Government.
It looks like a bit public-funded money-round with projects like...CO-CONNECT, "a UK-wide initiative that will connect COVID-19 data derived from patient blood samples"
https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/4-million-d ... arch/25996
The data could potentially transform COVID-19 research, providing experts with key information about patient immunity to the virus and treatment outcomes that could accelerate development of treatments and therapies.

There is some evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection. Understanding who is immune, and to what level, is vital to protect vulnerable individuals, to safely scale back population-based interventions and for managing disease transmission.
...like recovering from 'flu. Is there no end to this circus?

Can we anticipate all the legal claims against governments or businesses for "long covid"? Kerrrrching!!
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: What THEY tell us in advance.

Unread post by xileffilex »

The latest wheeze they've come up with to scare the young [who never seem to die from "Coronavirus" is LONG COVID which appears to be a rehash of what is described as "post-viral syndrome". Anyway, it's a good way to scare people. Obviously if you're in your mid 80s or older, it wont' be covid for very long, that being the brutal reality of respiratory infections in late age.

https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedrevie ... h-covid19/
Living with Covid19 - from the
National Institute for Health Research
Published on 15 October 2020
doi: 10.3310/themedreview_41169
NIHR is the nation's largest funder of health and care research and provides the people, facilities and technology that enables research to thrive. NIHR Evidence is managed by NIHR with a funding contribution from Health and Care Research Wales, Welsh Government.
It looks like a bit public-funded money-go-round with projects like...CO-CONNECT, "a UK-wide initiative that will connect COVID-19 data derived from patient blood samples"
https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/4-million-d ... arch/25996
The data could potentially transform COVID-19 research, providing experts with key information about patient immunity to the virus and treatment outcomes that could accelerate development of treatments and therapies.

There is some evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection. Understanding who is immune, and to what level, is vital to protect vulnerable individuals, to safely scale back population-based interventions and for managing disease transmission.
...like recovering from 'flu. Is there no end to this circus?

Can we anticipate all the legal claims against governments or businesses for "long covid"? Kerrrrching!!
Post Reply