The United Nations

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
Marfer
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2022 2:09 pm
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by Marfer »

nickw wrote: Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:53 am Glasgow Financial Advance for Net zero
GFANZ

https://www.gfanzero.com/
Here's Whitney with Ian Davis again explaining stuff: I've now had my wakeup call- have you?


(Interview begins at 13:20)

"The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) is a global coalition of leading financial institutions committed to accelerating the decarbonization of the economy.

Achieving the objective of the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature increases to 1.5°C from pre-industrial levels requires a whole economy transition. Every company, bank, insurer, and investor will need to adjust their business models, develop credible plans for the transition to a low-carbon, climate-resilient future, and then implement those plans.

GFANZ provides the tools and resources the financial sector needs to implement its net-zero commitments."

See all of the usual suspects involved here, including David Blood who has had a partnership with Al Gore, called
yep, you've guessed it Blood & Gore, more mockery. Mucho $$$$$$$'s to be made.
nickw
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2022 9:13 am
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by nickw »

Find out where you will fit in the planned world of 2030 and beyond, as proposed by TPTB.
That's supposing you are still around then, of course. Whatever your age now I mean.
It's 'interesting' guys.



Epstein up to 40 mins and Whitney's forthcoming book: Linking him to some of his backers, Robert Maxwell etc...

After that, transhumanism and our probable future- unless it meets real pushback real soon from enough of us working together somehow


My intro with Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth scenario: Took it all at face value I'm sorry to say, at the time.

He had a lot of history and pressure from his pa firstly,to get him into the key position by early 21C: VP to Old Billy boy, 'sustainability' Boom!

https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/ ... ming-fraud

I see how it is NOW- how hard to get out of that mainstream media flow
After 20 years the fraud is obvious (to me) but the damage's been done. Most people unquestioningly still believe in this narrative... so what might help them escape before it's too late? #AskingforFriends
nickw
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2022 9:13 am
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by nickw »

Here's a clip from 1992, where Al sets out the beginning of the arc, which is now touching all our lives thirty years later.




Just poignant how far we've travelled since then. He of course already knew its importance.

We've had 25 more conferences since ... he knew that too. Wow!
nickw
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2022 9:13 am
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by nickw »



All the players today seem to be using the same script here in 1992.
nickw
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2022 9:13 am
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by nickw »

By 2016 some warnings were appearing, here from the far right arm of political commentators.



The Maurice Strong quote was telling: "The current middle class lifestyle.... is not sustainable"
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by xileffilex »

nickw wrote: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:05 pm By 2016 some warnings were appearing, here from the far right arm of political commentators.
Very succinct video. Well worth watching.
Essex County Council in England is a signatory to the Aalborg Convention
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aalborg_Charter

Don't worry though, all development which goes on there is highly unsustainable. It's merely another talking shop, plenty of people ticking boxes, making the right noises, but nothing happening [thank goodness]
nickw
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2022 9:13 am
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by nickw »

I'm unsure what you mean "don't worry" ??

Maybe this is hitting me now harder than 5 yrs ago when I fell overboard from the SSGlobal Goals.

It's happening locally bcos the agenda was 'agreed' globally. Hence there will be (minor) divergencies but the overall plan is utterly anti-human. There will be squadrons of legionairres despatched locally to ensure it's not just 'going thru the motions'. Let's leave aside those at the top cynically pretending there's any real dangers. They will have armies of enablers, those who carry out/follow orders without question. They're brainwashed drones. Masses of them. Hordes. Their lives depend on them hitting the targets. And their families, their food, water, air, warmth too
We're facing those nutters who're led to believe the world is at risk. Really. Who are on bonuses to ensure mass compliance. If their bonuses depend on hitting targets set by their Fabianesque controllers, they will kick asses to achieve their targets. They may even be AI hybrids to some extent.

All those dystopian movies were telling us what''s coming down the line. Was Deckerd even a human? You see? Electric Sheep. Can we still dream on?

Look how the Nat Health was gutted. Like a cake full of weevils ...

Ian Davis gives the example of the Andes becoming an item = it becomes a resource: Strip mining merely needs a licence which obe gets by agreeing to offset some magical figure in accounting terms. The licence gives permission to some Mining Corp, but not to farmers using water coming from 'the Andes'. If he/she has no licence he/she can't access that water. It's now owned not a free to use resource anymore.

How long before the air I breathe has to be paid for/accessed via a licence? I can see that now I couldn't before. I wd NEVER have believed it possible!

Ian the Disillusioned Blogger.
I've asked if Ab can get Ian to come on here ...
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

From an April 2007 Brazilian article. How well is it going?
Ultimate goals of the UN

To fulfil this dream of a New World Order that would serve the lofty economic and social interests of its early visionaries, two steps were essential:
  1. Establish an efficient global administrative system that would unite the nations of the world through processes that felt "democratic" and produced cooperation with specific sets of goals and standards.
  2. Using this administrative system to shape minds, weaken sovereignty, establish social solidarity and train a global mobile workforce through: –
    • Redistribution of human and financial resources (migration, a global economy and a global welfare system).
    • A uniform global education system that would standardise both social "learning" and professional skills everywhere.
    • Control of the mainstream press and other propaganda channels.
Professor Carrol Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope: "There grew in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York that penetrated deeply into university life, the press and the practice of international politics. The American arm of this ' English establishment' exerted much of its influence through five US newspapers (The New York Times, Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post...) [Quigley, pg 953]

From a supportive "civil society" (including business and community groups, the news and entertainment media, churches, etc) prepared to lead the masses towards cultural and religious synthesis in communities and organisations around the world using the dialectical process - a well-tried and proven strategy in the former Soviet Union. (Many participants - including churches - may never know how their new business practices and small-group dialogues help undermine traditional values and prepare their members for the new global society.)
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

Another 2007 article from Brazilian site.
The Hidden Face of the UN

Interview by Michel Schooyans, Professor Emeritus of the University of Louvain Ano II Mattino della Domenica
By Luca Fiore

1. During the Congress on Globalisation, Economy and the Family, held in Rome from 27 to 30 November 2000 by the Pontifical Council for the Family, Mr. exposed the concept of globalisation according to the UN. This conception is also analysed at length in your most recent book, The Hidden Face of the UN, published by Sarment/Fayard, Paris, 2001. For you, this conception tends to consider that the environment has more value than the person. What it is? What is your concern?

Globalisation, Mondialisation: two terms that entered everyday language; two concepts that have become the subject of debates and discussions involving the future of world society. These terms mean, first of all, that human societies have become interdependent: for example, a devaluation of the Japanese yen has repercussions throughout the world economy. This also means that world societies are integrated: travel and the media teach men to know themselves better; scientific information is widely disseminated and discussed in virtual forums open 24 hours a day. In principle, we should obviously be happy with this evolution and it is clear that it demands new instruments for conducting international relations.

Traditionally, these international relations are organised based on two models. On the one hand, a model embodied today by the USA. Globalism is conceived there from the hegemonic project of the dominant nation, whose objective is to impose a neoliberal organisation of the world. This project initially has a strong economic connotation: its objective is the globalisation of the market; but it also obviously involves a desire to manage the world politically. It cannot be realised except with the connivance of rich nations. The other model is the heir of socialist internationalism and, if it insists on the necessary economic reforms, it puts a political objective in the foreground: limiting the sovereignty of states and subjecting them to the control of a world political power. The method of achieving this end is no longer revolutionary; in the spirit of Gramsci.

When it speaks of globalisation, the UN incorporates the meanings of that word as we have come to remember. But it takes advantage of the positive image associated with the term to give it a new meaning. Globalisation is interpreted in the light of a new vision of the world and of man's place in the world. This "holistic" view considers that the world constitutes a whole endowed with greater reality and value than the parts that compose it. In this whole, the emergence of man is but an avatar of the evolution of matter.

2. You also expressed serious reservations about the Earth Charter, a UN document in preparation, to be published shortly. You even claim that in him we find the influence of the New Age. What are the connections between the New Age and this text?

This is a draft document in which one of the drafters is none other than Mr. Mikhail Gorbachev himself. What does this document emphasise? Being only the product of a material evolution, man must bow to the imperatives of the environment, of Nature, of ecology. The influence of the philosopher Thomas S. Khun, one of the great inspirers of New Age, is evident here and confirmed in Marilyn Ferguson's books on the same current. Man must accept that he is no longer the centre of the world. According to this reading of nature and man, the "natural law" is no longer that which is inscribed in the intelligence and heart of man; it is the relentless and violent law that nature imposes on man. The tanned New Age ecologists even present man as a predator, and similar to all predator populations.

3. How does this Earth Charter relate to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights?

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 bows to a truth that is imposed on everyone. Recognises that all men have the right to life; who are born free and equal in dignity; who are free to associate, to assign themselves a political regime of their free choice, to organise themselves in trade unions, to create a family, to adhere to a religion, etc. All men have the right to participate in life; politics and economic life, since everyone has something unique to offer to other men. All the totalitarianisms of the 20th century were born out of contempt for these inalienable rights. To promote these rights throughout the world is to stand in the way of systems that reduce man to nothing more than a cog of the state, an instrument of the Party, a specimen of a certain race.

The Earth Charter abandons and even combats Judaeo-Christian and Roman anthropocentrism, reinforced by the Renaissance, and which was brought to its most incandescent point in the 1948 Declaration, and should even supplant the Decalogue itself, modesty aside!

4. You went so far as to speak of the UN project to progressively establish a "world super-government" that will supersede intermediate bodies, nations, and will impose a single mindset, through control of information, health, trade, of politics and law. Wouldn't that be a very George Orwell picture of the future?

The ecological argument developed in the Earth Charter is, in reality, an ideological device to camouflage something more serious: we are entering a new cultural revolution. Indeed, the UN is in the process of formulating a new conception of law. This conception is more Anglo-Saxon than Latin. The founding truths of the UN, referring to the centrality of man in the world, are little by little deactivated. According to this conception, no truth about man is imposed on all men: to each his own opinion. The rights of man are no longer recognised as truths; they are the object of procedures, of consensual decisions. We negotiated and at the end of a pragmatic procedure, we decided, for example, that respect for life is imposed in certain cases but not in others, that a certain genetic manipulation justifies the sacrifice of embryos, that euthanasia must be liberalised, that homosexual unions have the same right as the family, etc. Hence, the so-called "new human rights" are born, always renegotiable according to the interests of those who can make their will prevail.

To make these "new rights" palatable and, above all, the conception of law that underlies them, two axes of action must be privileged. Sovereign nations must first be weakened, as they are usually the first to protect the inalienable rights of their citizens. Then, in international assemblies, it is necessary to obtain the greatest possible consensus, resorting if necessary to corruption, blackmail or threats. Once reached, consensus can be invoked to bring about the adoption of international conventions that acquire the force of law in the states that have ratified them. This type of globalisation, supported by a purely positivist conception of law, justifies the most intense apprehensions.

5. The title of your latest book is The Hidden Face of the UN: what face is that, and who is hiding behind it?

In dossiers as complex as that of globalisation according to the UN, the lack of transparency clearly makes direct proof and mathematical demonstration difficult. The recent experience, in France, of malpractices and other irregularities confirms that no organisation is prepared to recognise that it is corroded by the action of confraternities, by the presence within it of "fraternities" and "networks". However, such realities exist without a shadow of a doubt. We know them not only by their actions, but also by what some of their members say about them publicly, for example on television. Of course, there are always people ready to fervently deny evidence, even when they don't even know where to find the dossiers.

In reality, the UN ideology of globalisation is shaped in free-examiner, agnostic, utilitarian and hedonistic references. If we patiently review recent UN meetings on issues as diverse as health, population, environment, habitat, world economy, information, education - to name but a few examples - we perceive a remarkable community of inspiration' and an equally remarkable convergence of goals. Of course, at the instigation of the sovereign nations that are its members, the UN should carry out an internal audit, failing which it will increasingly give the impression of being under the influence of a technocratic mafia. I have the advantage over others of arriving at this conclusion after several years of research. However, if you ask me if I saw the "invisible hand" with my own eyes, I must answer that I saw only his shadow. But in case, this is enough.
Post Reply