The United Nations

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
napoleon
Posts: 3720
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:23 pm
Has thanked: 1663 times
Been thanked: 664 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by napoleon »

great that rachel,really great

merry christmas sweetheart
my plan for exposing the oz masons , is on a backburner till this goose is cooked
User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by Unreal »

napoleon wrote: Sat Dec 24, 2022 5:33 am
" my plan for exposing the oz masons [...] "
-
The litterary twist to spells and spelling is really something. The fact OZ is ZOO backwards really take on meaning when you realise how deeply programmed we are and that also what we consider the "natural" world is actually staged in more ways than most dare imagine.
-
Looking at the words from Napoleon above made me wonder if the the word "mason" in itself might actually tell us subliminally what the quote anove spells out wih more words than need be/bee...
-
Mason - so Man - Oz Man (phonetic anagram)
napoleon
Posts: 3720
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:23 pm
Has thanked: 1663 times
Been thanked: 664 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by napoleon »

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

The UK New Normal Dictatorship
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-uk ... ctatorship

From 14th December 2021. I've pulled out a section. Worth reading the whole article about the Global Governance Dictatorship.
The UK Dictatorship Allows Itself to Torture and Murder with Impunity
However, the Coronavirus Act isn't the only dictatorial law which MPs have enacted and continue to accept without any qualms.

In October 2020, the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill sailed through its third Commons (and Lords) readings, virtually unopposed. In the Commons, most opposition MPs didn’t even bother to vote.

The opposition leader, Sir Keir Starmer, whipped his parliamentary colleagues not to oppose the bill. Just 20 Labour MPs defied the whip to vote against this tyrannical bill. The Act (CHIS) subsequently became law in March 2021.

On behalf of the G3P, the UK Government has given itself and its agencies under this law the authority to commit any crime it likes without fear of prosecution. The Joint Committee on Human Rights spelled out the purpose of the CHIS:
  • The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill provides a statutory basis for a variety of public authorities to authorise informants, covert agents and undercover officers to engage in criminal conduct […] by explicitly making authorised conduct ‘lawful for all purposes’ […]
    There is no express limit within the Bill on the type of criminal conduct that can be authorised. This raises the abhorrent possibility of serious crimes such as rape, murder or torture being carried out under an authorisation.
The CHIS amends the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and means that government bodies ranging from the intelligence services, the police and the military to the Department of Health and Social Care, the Food Standards Agency and, ironically, the Ministry of Justice can commit crimes against the people with total abandon.

The State doesn’t need to justify its criminal activity but, if anyone asks, it can simply say that it broke the law “in the interests of national security; for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime or of preventing disorder; or in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom”. In essence, it can make up any excuse it likes.

Not that asking the question will serve any practical purpose. The CHIS gives agents of the State immunity from prosecution and so, even if you had a watertight case proving state crimes, there would be no defendant to bring it against.

Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which remains in UK statute law after Brexit, claims to guarantee the right to a court hearing for cases of civil rights abuses. In addition, Article 8 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states:
  • Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Such violations might include, for example, the police planting evidence and then concocting false witness statements. However, as no crimes are ruled out in the CHIS, the violations concerned could also include murder.

The pretty words in the ECHR and the UDHR transpire to mean nothing. The concept of "human rights" is a total charade. The CHIS demonstrates that whenever government so chooses, it can completely ignore these so-called rights. They are not worth the paper they are written on.

"Human rights" are just an empty marketing strategy to convince you to trust in the institutions of government. They are scribbled on bits of paper by politicians and lawyers to make people imagine that their rights emanate from politicians and lawyers, thus affording them alleged authority over said rights. "Human rights" are not rights. They are government permits. What government grants, government can take away.

The only form of rights that actually exist are inalienable (or unalienable) rights. They are ours from birth and have nothing whatsoever to do with government. Government can respect or ignore them, and we can judge government accordingly.

Government cannot alter, amend or claim any dominion over inalienable rights. Hence the global, decades-long propaganda campaign to convince us all the believe in the asinine promise of "human rights".

We must not allow those who claim authority to continue to use duplicitous language unchallenged. Whenever they speak of "human rights", we should refute this deception. "Human rights" do not exist. The CHIS proves this beyond dispute in a particularly pure form.

When Britain set up the post-war "human rights" model for Europe, it went along with enshrining in several international treaties the right not to be killed or tortured as the untouchable "absolute human rights" with no scope for curtailment no matter what the claimed emergency, but Britain has now given itself a "human rights" model in which not even the right not to be killed or tortured turns out be "unqualified". They were touted as "absolute" until they were decided not to be "absolute".

Together the Coronavirus Act and the CHIS form the basis for the rest of the UK dictatorship. When combined with the other Bills and amendments currently gliding effortlessly towards the status of legislation, it ensures the kind of dictatorship that we are familiar with from the annals of history—just one cloaked in the faux democracy of “civil society”.

The CHIS provides the context for the forthcoming dictatorial powers. All are to be set within an environment of unfettered criminality to be exercised by the UK state.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

As we see with COVID, humans have become the guinea pigs, and computer modelling, the "experts" tell us, can be used instead of testing on animals. Don't test on animals, just cull them, see Slaughtered on Suspicion. Don't think in this cuddly new universe of the Theosophists, animals will fair any better. They don't want them alive, how many pets did you see in Star Trek TNG?, they just want us eating plastic.


Animal testing makes way for human testing
https://www.ukcolumn.org/blogs/animal-t ... an-testing
As reported by the prestigious journal Science, Congress has exempted the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—the world's trendsetter in this field—from the obligation to conduct animal experiments before testing drugs in humans.

Animal rights organisations are ecstatic. But what is behind the decision? And does this mean that humans can now legally be used as the proverbial "guinea pigs"? Unfortunately, it does. But let's take a closer look at the problem.

Clinical trials are human trials that are necessary to test pharmaceuticals for their efficacy and safety before they are approved and administered en masse to the human population. Pharmakon in ancient Greek means both "poison" and "remedy". From Paracelsus comes the aphoristic insight Dosis sola facit venenum: the dose alone makes for toxicity.

Thus, we need human trials to determine the correct dosage of pharmaceuticals and to study how they are distributed, metabolised and excreted or deposited in the body; how long they need to take effect (pharmacokinetics); how they work; and what undesirable effects they have (pharmacodynamics).

The process of studying pharmaceuticals in humans is roughly divided into three phases. Phase I serves to establish basic safety, the dose-response relationship and pharmacokinetics. Phase II is for the initial demonstration of an effect and further investigation of drug safety and aspects of pharmacokinetics. It is at this phase that most drugs are failed, owing to insufficient efficacy or toxicity.

Phase III serves to demonstrate efficacy and safety in larger samples and to generate empirical evidence to support the indications for using the drug. Animal trials serve to reduce the burden of human trials. That burden always consists of toxicity leading to the death of the subjects or chronic damage of them, taking such forms as destruction of the kidneys, chronic liver damage, heart muscle damage, damage to the nervous system or autoimmune disease—all forms of internal crippling...

...For the authors, animal and human welfare are of equal import. They call for the abolition of national regulation, for an end to the separation between human and veterinary medicine, and for the WHO's One Health programme to prepared the for further pandemics. This is to be done primarily through a massive expansion of vaccination programmes for animals and humans—to the advantage of the pharmaceutical industry, at the expense of human and animal health, which is exclusively harmed by nucleic acid therapies (see my response to a reader's query, point 4).

In doing so, they argue in the tradition of Peter Singer, whose 1975 book Animal Liberation was the first to call for the treatment of animals to be brought into line with that of humans and who first popularised veganism. The new legislation by Congress and the ideas of One Health seem to have taken up this view and radicalised it. But are they really serving animal welfare by doing so? I beg to differ; they are serving the good of the pharmaceutical industry, no matter how many human lives it costs. We are witnessing a demolition of human rights across the board.

If you choose to give up God, you don't get to keep the laws of God. The Papacy wants you to believe in Natural Law, they promote it from every angle. Because natural law can mean two things, and it split by where you think the universe starts. If you believe in a Creator God who made the Earth in seven days, then you believe the natural law that is set out in the Bible. If you believe in anything else, you are defaulted to Evolution and 'survival of the fittest', and by doing this, you have put yourself on the same level as bacteria. As Frank would say, you've accepted the offer.

@Unreal, I just noticed.
EVOL-UTION...EVIL-UTION.
Makes perfect sense.
evolution | ˌiːvəˈluːʃ(ə)n, ˈɛvəluːʃ(ə)n |
noun [mass noun]
  1. the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
    The idea of organic evolution was proposed by some ancient Greek thinkers but was long rejected in Europe as contrary to the literal interpretation of the Bible. Lamarck proposed a theory that organisms became transformed by their efforts to respond to the demands of their environment. Lyell demonstrated that geological deposits were the cumulative product of slow processes over vast ages. This helped Darwin towards a theory of gradual evolution over a long period by the natural selection of those varieties of an organism slightly better adapted to the environment and hence more likely to produce descendants. Combined with the later discoveries of the cellular and molecular basis of genetics, Darwin's theory of evolution has, with some modification, become the dominant unifying concept of modern biology.
  2. the gradual development of something: the forms of written languages undergo constant evolution.
  3. Chemistry the giving off of a gaseous product, or of heat: the evolution of oxygen occurs rapidly in this process.
  4. [count noun] a pattern of movements or manoeuvres: flocks of waders often perform aerial evolutions.
  5. Mathematics, dated the extraction of a root from a given quantity.
DERIVATIVES
evolutional adjective
evolutionally adverb
evolutive | iːˈvɒljuːtɪv | adjective

ORIGIN
early 17th century: from Latin evolutio(n-) ‘unrolling’, from the verb evolvere (see evolve). Early senses related to movement, first recorded in describing a ‘wheeling’ manoeuvre in the realignment of troops or ships. Current senses stem from a notion of ‘opening out’, giving rise to the sense ‘development’.
I do like throwing in Star Trek TNG, because even at the time of watching, I concluded, in that fictional universe, the Communists clearly won.

Examples of Communism in star trek
User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by Unreal »

rachel wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 8:58 am EVOL-UTION...EVIL-UTION.
Makes perfect sense.
-
There clearly is "evil" encoded in evolution.
-
Not sure what to make of the "UTION" part of the word though. Most habitually its entire words that are encoded in a wholesome way or fashion, so there might be something more to uncover about the overall encoding of "evolution".
-
Otherwise, it sure is enigmatic that we are indeed either on the divine creation team or on the evolution team !
-
As an agnostic i lean more towards divine creation of an unknowable type. Unsettling for sure not to have the answers* about Earth and mankinds origin, and not expect to ever possess these answers. I'm afraid all answers we are given on these subjects* by men are untrue, but they do fill the scary void of knowledge that we as humans find so unacceptable to our intellect and person.

* imho there is no way any living creature witnessed creation and no way a divine force would let men write anything in its name, which leaves us without answers to many existential questions. In order to gain these answers, many accept organised religion and their claim to holy* text and scripture (Dead Sea scrolls stands out as an elaborate hoax by the Church just like Scientism has done with proof in favour of "evilution" - same method same group i'd say)
-
* pretty sure there is more land though, so we sill have a lot of creation to discover much closer to us than anything orbiting in space, and religion play a big part in our prisoner state of living in a falsely reduced world governed by foul organisations and individuals for their own profit
-
* many encoded spellings in religious jargon too: pray - prey, holy holly - hol-ly whole/all lie
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

We agree to disagree on certain things, but I do take your point. The thing is, Frank is right about "the offer'"; the trap the Papacy (New Babylon) has always set, in rejection of the proclaimed Word of God, in which there is "No Guile", one automatically puts oneself in the other camp. Survival of the fittest is survival of the richest.

The Jews chose Barabbas, it's worth considering what can be learned from that study. But the Papacy doesn't want us to learn from the past, so it funds all the "Mud Flood", "200 Year History" youtube channels. And I suspect, the people putting this stuff out don't even realise who's hands they are playing into.

User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by Unreal »

the Papacy (New Babylon)
-
The reference to Babylon or "whore of Babylon" spells out evil or satan. If Satanism originates from judaism, the Vatican would very logically be ruled by satanic jews.
-
Image
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

I go with the reverse idea. In Jesus' time it was the Romans and the Pharisees, Roman Pilate wanted to let Jesus go, but it was the Jewish Pharisees who had their controllers in the crowd to instigate that the guards release Barabbas instead. The Pharisees had the upper hand when it came to controlling the people.

I believe we are living in a chiastic structure:

https://www.gotquestions.org/chiasm-chiastic.html
A chiasm (also called a chiasmus) is a literary device in which a sequence of ideas is presented and then repeated in reverse order. The result is a “mirror” effect as the ideas are “reflected” back in a passage. Each idea is connected to its “reflection” by a repeated word, often in a related form. The term chiasm comes from the Greek letter chi, which looks like our letter X. Chiastic pattern is also called “ring structure.”

Greek letter chi,.png
Greek letter chi,.png (4.52 KiB) Viewed 15094 times

The structure of a chiasm is usually expressed through a series of letters, each letter representing a new idea. For example, the structure ABBA refers to two ideas (A and B) repeated in reverse order (B and A). Often, a chiasm includes another idea in the middle of the repetition: ABXBA. In this structure, the two ideas (A and B) are repeated in reverse order, but a third idea is inserted before the repetition (X). By virtue of its position, the insertion is emphasized.

Some chiasms are quite simple. The common saying “When the going gets tough, the tough get going” is chiastic. The words going and tough are repeated, in reverse order, in the second half of the sentence. The structure is ABBA. Another example of a chiasm, also with the ABBA structure, is Benjamin Franklin’s axiom “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” Other chiasms are more complex, even spanning entire poems...

The X point of our literal chiasm being The Cross of Jesus Christ.

Unknown.png

From this point on, the power structure swapped, though the protagonists remained the same. Rather than Jewish Pharisees, the Church, in a Roman Empire, the State. We will see the Roman Pharisees, the Papacy, in Zion, the Jewish State.



Do you see the false Cross?

ScreenShot-VideoID-ZZX2Q7scTN8-TimeS-136.png

It is my guess this is where the False Messiah will emerge from. Why? Because it will bring Islam into the fold. I'm yet to cover this aspect in Baha'i movers & shakers, but I do intend to expand on my thinking in that thread.

Image
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The United Nations

Unread post by rachel »

I'm not sure if this is quite the correct thread for this, but since there is a large section on the Sustainable Development Goals, and the UN does appear to be the World Government, let's compare Carbon Credits with pre-Reformation Indulgences. I've queued up the video at the point where Walter goes into the theology of indulgences, and to make it easier just to compare them with the proposed carbon market (bottom). Now bare in mind, below is the replacement system for Justification by Faith in Jesus Christ, and it becomes very interesting indeed when we add in the trans-humanism angle (not addressed here).

971 - The Cornerstone of Protestantism / Darkness Before Dawn - Walter Veith

...Martin Luther nailed his theses against that door and he confronted the issue of indulgences and indulgences alone. Nothing else. At that time, the Pope was reconstructing St. Peter's and he needed a lot of money, and he made a good deal. He made a deal with the government, a deal with the bankers and with a agents that acted as salesmen, and he sold indulgences. And one of the great salesmen at that time was the monk, Johann Tetzel, and this was an indulgence box.

971 The Cornerstone of Protestantism - WV22.jpg

He would tie two of these boxes to a donkey and then he would go and he would sell indulgences, extremely legal documents. Here's a copy of one of those indulgences, and you can see there are various stamps of approval on it, because everybody got a cut. If it was sold in a particular district, the government got its portion. The banks that handled the money got their portion, and the salesman got his commission and the rest went to Rome. So it was a good business.

971 The Cornerstone of Protestantism - WV21.jpg

But the question is what is an indulgence? And this is very important, that we understand what an indulgence is, because the question we have to ask ourselves is, is that issue dead? Is it something that existed in the days of Martin Luther 500 years ago and people today are no longer involved in this kind of thinking? Or is it something that is alive and well? And if so, what does it mean?...

...Rome claims that it has a treasure chest and this treasure chest does not consist of money, it consists of good works. Now let's read; "The treasury of merit consists of the super abundant merits of Christ, as well as the merits of the saints; the treasury of merit is one because of the communion of the saints in the Body. Christ being the head. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches the following about the treasury of merit: - We also call the spiritual goods of the communion of the saints the Church's treasury, which is not the sum total of the material goods which have accumulated during the course of the centuries. On the contrary the 'treasury of the Church' is of infinite value, which can never be exhausted, which Christ's merits have before God. They were offered so that the whole of mankind could be set free from sin and attain communion with the Father."

If you look at the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and you read the following article, you will see: "In Christ, the Redeemer himself, the satisfactions and merits of his Redemption exists and find their efficacy. This Treasury includes as well the prayers and the good works of the Blessed Virgin Mary. They are truly immense, unfathomable and even pristine in the value before God. In the treasury, too, are the prayers and good works of all the saints, all those who have followed in the footsteps of Christ, the Lord and by His grace have made their lives holy and carried out the mission in the unity of the Mystical Body."

So that's the Catholic Catechism, we need to unpack this. What does this mean? So this Treasury has the good works of Christ. This Treasury has the good works of Mary which are pristine; and it has the good works of all the saints. And this treasure belongs to the Church. This is what Rome teaches, so let's continue with this Roman Catholic explanation. This is them writing; - "Merit cannot be transferred, but meritorious acts can make satisfaction for another, by giving to God a gift of greater value than what was taken by the sin. This is how Christ's own actions in his passion and death made satisfaction for the sins of the whole world. (And you must have a look at the doctrine of the Atonement.) But it is also the way the meritorious acts of the saints can make satisfaction for others' debt of temporal punishment. St. Thomas (this is Thomas Aquinas) writes, "All the saints intended that whatever they did or suffered for God's sake, should be profitable not only to themselves, but to the whole Church."

Okay, so here's a treasure and it consists of all the good works of the saints. Now, the merit cannot be transferred, but the merit can appease God so that he will forgive because a greater gift has been given him than that which has lost by the other. So let's continue, this is what they write: "...This treasure here He (God) neither wrapped up in a napkin nor hid in the field, but entrusted it to the Blessed Peter, the key bearer, and his successors, that they might, for just and reasonable causes, distribute it to the faithful in full or in partial remission of the temporal punishment due to sin." ...Aha. So who is the one who has the capacity to distribute this treasure of merit? The Pope. Peter and his legitimate successors: So only the Pope has the power to distribute the merit. But the merit does not forgive your sins, it only relieves the punishment due to the sin. All right. That's another strange thing. "The Church, by the authorisation of Christ, and through the communion of saints, can draw from one treasury of merit and satisfaction to reduce or remove the debt of temporal punishment for anyone united to the Body through sanctifying grace. And that is just what an indulgence is: - An indulgence is a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven, which the faithful Christian who is duly disposed gains under certain prescribed conditions through the actions of the Church which, as the minister of redemption..." so who is the Minister of redemption? - The Church. "...dispenses and applies with authority the treasury of satisfaction of Christ and the saints."

We can see, the original Indulgence system was a market to cash in on fear. Today's insurance industry is a shade of the very same thing, and with regards to things like cars, it has the "force of law" behind it. They used travel to underpin their system in the 20th Century - carrot and stick - but the miserable bastards hate the fact that with transport comes independence, so they cooked up their "global warming" scam, and pretend it's about uniting people. With it, they see a way of taking the carrot away and just leaving the stick to beat us with. Because that will really unite everyone, won't it? You've got to wonder why all the idiots in the chain happily help to build a prison they themselves will become prisoners of? - I guess it must be the "white-coat-owner syndrome"... I've just made that term up, but you'll recognise it... it's the syndrome where scientists talk about humans as if they themselves are not part of that class and so will not be effected by the pronouncements they make. - No, once this system is in place, I hate to break it to them; but they will literally kill their own children not to have their white coat taken from them so not to become a pleb like everyone else caught in the trap they helped to create.

Here's a list of some of the kinds of hoop jumping we can look forward to in the Metaverse. Bear in mind, travelling to a Shrine, Baha'i temples fall into this class, will probably be off the limit to most of us; and we can imagine praying in front of statues will be converted into timed sessions of screen activity in front of a virtual Queen of Heaven.

971 The Cornerstone of Protestantism - WV24.jpg


Let me just continue with Walter's summing up, so we can compare with the carbon market.
...So the Church teachers that it has access to this merit (the creator of the market). And if you are a sinner, then you fall short. You go to a priest (a seller of carbon credits) and you ask forgiveness for your sins (excess carbon used), and your sins are forgiven. But the punishment due to the sin must still come (fine). So now, if you have confessed (paid), you are forgiven. But now you must still be punished for what you have done (carbon use). So you can't go directly to heaven, because you must be punished for what you have done. So Rome inserted a place, in between heaven and earth, where you go to receive that punishment before you can go to heaven. And that place is called purgatory. So now you are in purgatory (the metaverse). And you're only in purgatory if your sins have been forgiven (you are carbon-neutral). If your sins have not been forgiven, if you've committed a mortal sin, and you have not confessed it and you die in that sin, you don't go to purgatory, you go straight to hell, you don't pass go and you don't get 200 bucks, you go straight to hell (still a mystery). So this in between place is the place where you pay the penalty for what you have done for what is already forgiven. It's a very strange theology.

And Let's do the same from the carbon market perspective.
rachel wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:38 am Carbon Markets 101

A carbon market (treasury of merit) allows investors and corporations to trade both carbon credits (good works) and carbon offsets (indulgences) simultaneously. This mitigates the environmental crisis, while also creating new market opportunities.

New challenges nearly always produce new markets, and the ongoing climate crisis and rising global emissions (sins) are no exception.

The renewed interest in carbon markets is relatively new. International carbon trading markets have been around since the 1997 Kyoto Protocols, but the emergence of new regional markets have prompted a surge of investment.

The advent of new mandatory emissions trading programs (justification by good works) and growing consumer pressure have driven companies to turn to the voluntary market for carbon offsets (indulgence system). Changing public attitudes on climate change and carbon emissions (nudging away from sound scriptural understanding) have added a public policy incentive. Despite an ever-shifting background of state, federal, and international regulations (Papal strength), there’s more need than ever for companies and investors to understand carbon credits (treasury of merit).

This guide will introduce you to carbon credits and outline the current state of the market. It will also explain how credits (good works) and offsets (indulgences) work in currently existing frameworks (Papal system) and highlight the potential for growth.
Post Reply