Helen Keller

YouCanCallMeAl
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun May 29, 2022 7:36 am
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Helen Keller

Unread post by YouCanCallMeAl »

As requested by Ab, I'm starting a thread on Helen Keller.

I believe she was a hoax. I think you can read her wiki to see how unlikely it is that she is as portrayed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Keller

"Keller was also a prolific author, writing 14 books and hundreds of speeches and essays on topics ranging from animals to Mahatma Gandhi.[1] Keller campaigned for those with disabilities, for women's suffrage, labor rights, and world peace. In 1909 she joined the Socialist Party of America. She was a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union."

"At 19 months old, Keller contracted an unknown illness .... The illness left Keller both deaf and blind."

It seems impossible to me to conceive of someone deaf and blind even being able to do much more than make clear she was happy/sad/hungry.

But she wrote books (14 of them!!), had a good handle on geopolitics, opinions on the right direction for society, etc, etc. How could someone so 'locked in' manage to even find concepts 'society', 'human nature', 'socialism', etc, etc. This is far more successful than anyone I know!

And let's not forget that she was not communicating at all from 19months to age 7. These are crucial years in a child's development! I know children that had glue ear but recovered, but mentally remained somewhat impacted on account of losing their hearing for a while.

I'm not sure what the truth is. She could be partially hearing, partially sighted, a total faker, her handler/assistant Anna Sullivan could be the actual author, etc. She could be a local 'show' that hit the big time, or part of an elite plan - she argued for socialism, women's suffrage - a character that is put up with an unassailable cloak of taboo protection - similar to Greta Thunberg - ie who dares publicly criticise a disabled person (or in Greta's case - a child)? It would be bad taste to do so.

Of course, its also possible that she is as portrayed - but the simplest explanation is preferable to me - and that is that there is some sort of hoax in play.

Interesting too are the articles that jump to her defence:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/ ... -her-story
"Obviously, the entire theory is shockingly ableist, and serves as an example of the sort of prejudices that disabled people face every day"

https://daily.jstor.org/what-does-it-me ... r-a-fraud/
"Williams detailed a controversy over a story Keller had written, “The Frost King.”" - which in itself seems like misdirection to me, as it assumes she could write at all with those disabilities.. The article wants to say anyone who questions this is a ableist and racist - it brings in a black poet to conflate and smear.

https://meaww.com/what-is-the-fraud-hel ... -life-fake
"According to an article published by Isabella Lahoue, 'The Generation that Doesn’t Believe Helen Keller Existed', where she answers the question, "Why is it then that the only people who don’t believe in Helen Keller are teenagers?" saying, "Maybe it’s because we were never technically educated on her in school like we were on Anne Frank and other historical figures." Hmm.. Anne Frank and her biro doesn't help....

All I see is weak, bad faith defences. The articles do not address the merit's of the argument that there is a potential trick in play, but do attack the thoughtcrime of daring to question the presentation.
User avatar
dirtybenny
Posts: 1573
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:52 pm
Has thanked: 922 times
Been thanked: 733 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by dirtybenny »

Hey Al.....great to see you on the forums.

best

db

@YouCanCallMeAl
User avatar
Grand Illusion
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon May 02, 2022 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by Grand Illusion »

I think the purpose of putting a Helen (K)eller out there who is allegedly deaf and blind is to normalize people with disabilities and get sympathy for them. With all the toxins from food, water, medications, vaccinations, etc. increasing in the 20th century, the powers that be are/were trying to weaken the population. The masses have been getting sicker over the last 100+ years. With that said, I'm sure those at the top anticipate this and know they have to swerve the masses from thinking something fishy is going on. So if a Hellen Keller is put out there tricking everyone into thinking she has all these disabilities and still gets through life getting a lot accomplished, it's glorifying being disabled and weak while also normalizing being disabled and weak.

Also I always wondered why the movie Rain Man staring Tom Cruise and Dustin Hoffman was such a big deal. Why would a movie about a man with autism need to get made by movie studios, directors or writers and have the biggest 80s star Tom Cruise in it along with another star actor in Dustin Hoffman, a hit song by Hans Zimmer with a $25 million budget (1988)? Why would Tom Cruise in the peak of his career read the Rain Man script and say he needed to do a film about a autistic man? Autism was fairly new in the 1980s. It's very suspect and who knows what really went on behind the scenes to make the Rain Man movie come together in the way it did.

This Rain Man movie was about Dustin Hoffman's character having a vaccine damaged disease Autism. So Rain Man is glorying being disabled and normalizing it just in time for a surge of Autism that was going to start happening in the 1990s. This movie just so happened to come out (1988) around the time the vaccines and vaccine schedule for children got ramped up following President Ronald Regan excusing Vaccine manufactures from liability from vaccine damaged people suing them and putting it on the government's shoulders to deal with (1986). Wow, how did all that coincide?
YouCanCallMeAl
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun May 29, 2022 7:36 am
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by YouCanCallMeAl »

FWIW the reason I looked into Helen Keller was because of this article I read by Cynthia Chung, who appears on Tim Kelly's 'Our Interesting Times'.

I read it, then thought about what was being presented, took a quick look online and found some laddish video that broke down the hoax quite well. Anyway, I posted a comment on Cynthia's site and she was outraged. In fact, I recently realised that she deleted the whole exchange.

Here is the link and you can see the comments below:
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/on- ... f-darkness

Once I realised that she had deleted my suggestion/argument that this was a hoax, I wrote a new comment asking her about this. This can still be seen here:
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/on- ... nt/7322667

She has now replied and confirms she did delete my comments, and will delete these ones too and ban me. Oh dear..

Anyway, the exchange is now captured here too. And I'll add a comment posting back here.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220629113 ... s/comments

For the record, here are screenshots of our latest exchange:
Attachments
cynthia2.png
cynthia1.png
User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by Unreal »

Image
Helen Keller on Cape Cod in july 1888 with lifelong companion and teacher Anne Sullivan Keller
-
Seems like Keller has been a public figure all her life. She wrote her autobiography at just 23 which immediatly was adapted for the theatre and then became a film. Her house is today a museum - just like Anne Frank. Both are very jewish of origin of course. Creating fake empathy seems like a typically jewish script, and money is still earned from Keller today in various forms.
-
A good PsyOp seems to be a hoax that becomes history, thereby ensuring a continous stream of influence and revenue that makes it worthwhile to contribute to. And it keeps the lie alive, and the message still potent. A whole ecosystem is built around hoaxes with statues, books, never seen pictures and footage that keeps turning up that reminds us never to forget..
-
Image
Helen Keller feeling the face of her interpreter Polly Thompson, Chicago 1946
-
Having Keller at your party feeling everones faces must have been a popular trick. Not sure why Keller needs to examine her lifetime companion Polly Thompson herover, but it seems everyone just are into the trick by now...
-
From the Cape Cod childhood photograph of Keller with Sullivan, the doll makes the image look rather peculiar. It creates a certain russian doll effect - a large puppet, a medium puppet and a small doll...
User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by Unreal »

Image
Keller feeling faces with lifetime companion Sullivan - Gosh, is that really Sullivan ?
-
Image
Keller feeling faces with Rt Hon W Paling at the House of Commons in London, 1946
-
Image
Keller feeling faces with President Eisenhower in the Oval Office, 1953
User avatar
dirtybenny
Posts: 1573
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:52 pm
Has thanked: 922 times
Been thanked: 733 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by dirtybenny »

I would expect nothing less from a Tim Kelly guest. Their purpose is to keep you thinking inside of the box.

I know that there are several fans of Kelly's podcast in the fakeologist community. I am not on that list. The volume of material/guests/propaganda that this operation churns out makes Mathis look like a slacker.

Unreal has done the spreadsheets on his "show" from 2015-2018.
Untitled.jpg
Kelly reverentially still ponders who killed "President" Kennedy?

I would prefer listening to mainstream media....

https://allunreal.com/blog/tcc-spreadsheets/
YouCanCallMeAl
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun May 29, 2022 7:36 am
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 304 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by YouCanCallMeAl »

I used to listen to Tim Kelly, who I found out about via Joe Atwill, who used to appear on Gnostic Media. Some of the stuff was interesting to me at that time. Obviously he is a Catholic - which says to me he is trapped in some provided thinking.

Slowly I came to the realisation that his show is some sort of alt. geopolitical/cultural analysis - something that gives some air to a sort of highbrow thinking - the type that Jay Dyer likes to do at times. I did find some nuggets of interesting research there. The No Agenda Show or even Alex Jones would be lower-brow equivalent of alt. media.

Ultimately, I agree with you - these sorts of analyses aren't about resolving and understanding something to the foundation, they didn't/don't help me to come to a realisation of the truth or what can be known - instead they just add to mire of the thought and opinion. Really its talk about talk. This is a market though - there is money to be made there and value for someone in the distraction, as there appear to be lots of people that prefer to outsource their thinking and alt analysis to 'the experts'.
User avatar
dirtybenny
Posts: 1573
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:52 pm
Has thanked: 922 times
Been thanked: 733 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by dirtybenny »

Me, too, Al....i listened to all those players on Unreal's list for years...

I realize now that they are ACTIVELY limiting the scope and breadth of thought and creativity. If we fakeologists can come to the conclusion that JFK was a psyop and no one died, you don't think Fetzer, Dammegard, and Kelly know this? Of course they do. They are limited hangouts and meant to stifle your models and paradigms, so that you don't escape Plato's Cave.

The Dave J encounter with Fetzer was an illustration of how bridled their presentations are. First half hour only with Dave J.

User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Helen Keller

Unread post by Unreal »

YouCanCallMeAl wrote: Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:00 am I used to listen to Tim Kelly, who I found out about via Joe Atwill, who used to appear on Gnostic Media.
-
Helen Keller was a MainStream Media figure which makes her character's agenda more straight forward to comprehend from an alternative truth perspective. Part of the trick to make MainStream Media popular is to create controversy and contrary opinion - this is the job of the Alternative Media and opiniated pundits. Like the No Agenda Show, like Alex Jones, like the thousand Alt Media outlets that are out there.
-
The one feeds the other, you see - so to the Elite its just as important to be in control of the Alt Media as the MainStream Media. Even if you consider that the vast majority of media-producing Alt Truthers are paid operators as do I - this doesn't mean the material presented is all bad. Rather the contrary, in order to lead the passionate alternative truth research community, you need to provide some significant parts of valid material.
-
In other words, most of Alt Media IS paid operators and operations - think the entire UFO movement or 911 movement. We still would need to pay attention to these "shills" and fake truth outlets- or at least some of them - in order to follow and pick up information. As you understand, it is the PsyOp team that elaborated the UFO phenomenon and 911 that sits on all the information. Meaning they have the actual information we're looking for. Who more expert than a member of an actual PsyOp team?
-
Image
UFO Conference - all paid agents... No exception, it wouldn't work otherwise as it would jeopardize the operation.
Just by taking the scope of one culture creation like the UFO movement - made to accompany NASA in space discovery - try wrap your head around how many people and what budgets are part of this kind of an operation - authors, researchers, journalists, dedicated media outlets...The UFO culture creation machine is still in place seventy more years after it was invented as after the war propanda building up for the space race...

Post Reply