Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)

Unread post by rachel »

Might be worth having a thread on this.

The Billionaire Family Pushing Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news ... -pritzkers
We are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful, and beneficent.

For-profit medical corporations and nonprofit institutions that intersect with the goliath LGBT NGO infrastructure, many of which receive Pritzker funding, have created a political scaffolding to engineer the institutionalization of SSI ideology and medical practice in the United States—solidifying the concept of people being born in wrongly sexed bodies or wrongly being born in sexed bodies at all. At least two clinics in California are now providing nonbinary surgeries and nullification surgeries for individuals who feel both male and female, or like neither.

The Gender Multispeciality Service (GeMS) at Boston Children’s Hospital, “the first major program in the U.S. to focus on gender-diverse and transgender adolescents,” was founded in 2007. “Since that time,” says the GeMS website, “we have expanded our program to welcome patients from ages 3 to 25.” The first such clinic for children in the Midwest, the Gender & Sex Development Program at Lurie Children’s Hospital, opened in Chicago in 2013 with a $500,000-$1 million gift pledge from Pritzker. (The husband of Jean “Gigi” Pritzker, another cousin, sits on Lurie’s board of directors.) The Gender Mapping Project estimates that there are now thousands of similar “gender clinics” around the world, and over 400 that offer to medically manipulate the sex of children.

Like Stryker’s Arcus Foundation, the Pritzkers have forged a close relationship with the psychiatric establishment. The Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health at Lurie was launched with a $15 million gift from the Pritzker Foundation in 2019, and received another $6.45 million in 2022 to address “concerns about mental health consequences for children and adolescents arising from the COVID pandemic.” Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Jennifer’s cousin, signed into law SB 2085, Coverage of the Psychiatric Collaborative Care Model (CoCM)—the American Psychiatric Association’s model legislation requiring private insurers and Medicaid in Illinois to cover CPT codes for CoCM, which “requires a primary care (or other) physician or clinician to lead a team that includes a behavioral health care manager who checks in with patients at least once a month and an off-site psychiatric consultant who regularly reviews patients’ progress and offers advice.”

Jeanne Pritzker, married to J.B.’s brother Anthony, who is Jennifer’s cousin, is a training psychologist at UCLA where she and her husband established the Anthony and Jeanne Pritzker Family Scholarship to support medical students at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. Mrs. Pritzker is a member of the Board of Visitors at the Geffen School, which is affiliated with a children’s hospital named after Mattel—the multinational toy company that debuted a “transgender Barbie” recently made in the likeness of the actor Laverne Cox.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)

Unread post by rachel »

Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Synthetic Sex Identities - Jennifer Bilek
https://freedomlibrary.hillsdale.edu/pr ... identities

Lecture video

Jennifer Bilek
Investigative Journalist
Jul 28, 2022
Last edited by rachel on Wed Sep 28, 2022 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)

Unread post by rachel »



Biden Uses Executive Order To Institutionalize Eugenics, Transhumanism
https://www.technocracy.news/biden-uses ... shumanism/
The National Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Initiative was created by President Biden’s Executive Order on September 12, 2022. It virtually guarantees that transhumanism and genetic manipulation of citizens will be the main topic of the 2024 election cycle.

The EO is tectonic in that it aligns and mandates all agencies “to coordinate a whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing… to help us achieve our societal goals.”

What “societal goals”? This phrase is used no less that SIX times in this document. Section 8 states that the “societal goals” are identified in Section 3, but upon examination, only recursive goals are found there, ordering agencies to create reports to submit to higher levels. For instance, Section 3(v) states the purpose is “to address the societal goals identified in this section.”

But the only goals here are to create reports. Section 3(i) is apparently one of those goals:
  • The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), in consultation with the heads of appropriate agencies as determined by the Secretary, shall submit a report assessing how to use biotechnology and biomanufacturing to achieve medical breakthroughs, reduce the overall burden of disease, and improve health outcomes.
So, are the societal goals to submit reports? Well, that is what it says except that the reports are directed toward “health, climate change and energy, food and agricultural innovation, resilient supply chains, and cross-cutting scientific advances.”
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)

Unread post by rachel »

Not quite the best fit for this article, but...

Beauty Pageant's Rejection Of Transgender Women Is Legal, Appeals Court Rules
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bea ... ourt-rules
...Graber also said the Oregon law “neither improperly compels speech nor violates the owner’s freedom of association.”

VanDyke authored a concurring opinion to address the dissent, finding that the pageant is protected by the First Amendment from both compelled speech and forced association.

He referenced a previous Supreme Court ruling that enabled the Boy Scouts to exclude a gay leader because including him would “interfere with the Boy Scouts’ choice not to propound a point of view contrary to its beliefs.”

“The case before us is not meaningfully distinguishable,” he said. Green identifies as a transgender woman and an activist who has talked about using pageant platforms to deliver a message that runs against Miss United States of America’s beliefs.

“The Pageant expresses its message through its contestants—both by those who compete and those who ultimately succeed,” VanDyke said. “And the Pageant has actively and consistently enforced its eligibility requirements precisely over a concern about protecting its message. The forced inclusion of a male would therefore directly impact the Pageant’s message in a way fundamentally at odds with the Pageant’s views on womanhood.”
Post Reply