Fakeologist Forums

These authors worked upon the basic hypothesis that the events of 911 do not constitute attacks by any enemy force of any form, but they were only presented as such through various techniques by the US official authorities, while what really took place was something different.

Never wanted office space. Never wanted to be open year round. The 1946 WTC committee took over the department that told them no. They were never able to escape the tower office thing being part of the plane. 93 bombing is the starting point of dismantling the buildings for demolition.

The real crimes will have been committed in the other buildings of that complex. Where did all the evidence go? It's that paper flying around in all the footage. That inconspicuous confetti was their joyous picture of the day.

No one said no glass except napoleon never even heard it.

And when I read it. Took a couple days to digest it. I can up with an answer to my question of why do the windows look so glitchy.

I'll have a screen shot of a tourist YouTube video and a screenshot of youtube 9/11 footage paused.

I am going for the sensational angle that their appears to be something blowing out the window. Are we seeing the beginning of no glass?

Leave with my actual thought. Quality of random tourist photo and day of video footage seems off. Like produced. Like NW lays out.
Movie set. This footage was shot in the hans solo hotel next door. I have a copy with horrible green stain. I recently found a better longer one. Eh. Whatever.