11 thoughts on “Sheep Through The Gate – Aussie Comitatus RMX

  1. napoleonnapoleon

    being totally honest ab ,i grew up where people would dance to all types of car alarm music, that psilly ass shit gaia loves was all the rage and for twenty odd years i walked past them clubs

    it is atrocious

    1. Dave j

      I don’t do questions
      I do a question
      As if you cannot get past that there is no reason to continue I have sent my question to Tim a fakeologist supposedly he can then read and study on it and pass it to his guest I will also send a copy to his guest thank you so much

  2. napoleonnapoleon

    typo you can have my fold out bed couch anytime you are in manchester pal

    and cck calm card ken ,i get 500 hits a day lover ,i dont need fuckall checking or reviewing ,just a fakeologist that can read the blog on air ,so shh if this was debunkable the brightest and best wouldnt be shitting their pants in your discord
    https://fakeologist.com/forums2/viewtopic.php?p=12476#p12476
    and i did say i was gonna lament with you girls in 2019

    rozies tomb can’t hold me ,and the monolith gimp got slapped ,the religion masons don’t discuss is new to them you see ,they think some towers in new york falling was for them ,not on your nellie

    them babies are mine now

    1. Dave j

      I tell you one thing even the demons that don’t think I can see them should know that I do none hide from me I just give more slack than others in the end I’m going to happily and with merriment cast them into dissipation make no mistake about that

      1. napoleonnapoleon

        i agree dave
        remove as many as the redherrings falsehood wrong axiom and cowards as you can ,and educate the men that matter

        tom bombadill is a fascinating character ,i spent a while today listening to theories and other chats about him , ashitload of tolkien nerds out there

        will have to learn more about this man

        1. Dave j

          So no one can claim not to have seen the question this being a public square of sorts
          yes NW i do not like those that “fain” ignorance.

          SO i left a copy of my 1 question for atwill I have placed it into context you will note. Here is what i asked.


          Theory

          Caesar’s Messiah by Joseph Atwill.

          argues that

          1) Jesus of Nazareth was an invention of the Roman Empire, by Josephus writing the entire NT after AD 70.

          2) Parallels between the New Testament and Josephus’ Jewish War.

          Why?

          1) Romans invented Jesus to pacify the Jewish people by manufacture of a suffering messiah, not a conquering one.

          Response Leading to the One and only Question Joe will answer.

          I will leave on the table 2 facts, One the 7 or Hoax code and the Idea that there was a Revolt (war) is a HOAX

          With the caveat this proves the HOAX and thus the No-since At-will peddles

          SO then “josephus wrote in the “jewsh war” the following,”Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles.”

          What feeling do you take from that?

          Was there any sign in the so called roman empire of what was called Christians?

          “Roman historian” Tacitus places Christian under Emperor Nero in AD 64

          “Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome… Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination when daylight had expired”

          Cornelius Tacitus Annals 15:44

          https://tinyurl.com/2punbkyf

          In AD 110, the Roman governor Pliny writes to the Roman Emperor Trajan

          “THE METHOD YOU have pursued, my dear Pliny, in sifting the cases of those denounced to you as Christians is extremely proper. It is not possible to lay down any general rule which can be applied as the fixed standard in all cases of this nature. No search should be made for these people; when they are denounced and found guilty they must be punished; with the restriction, however, that when the party denies himself to be a Christian, and shall give proof that he is not (that is, by adoring our gods) he shall be pardoned on the ground of repentance, even though he may have formerly incurred suspicion. Informations without the accuser’s name subscribed must not be admitted in evidence against anyone, as it is introducing a very dangerous precedent, and by no means agreeable to the spirit of the age”

          BOOK TEN LETTER 97 TRAJAN TO PLINY

          https://www.vroma.org/vromans/hwalker/Pliny/Pliny10-097-E.html

          Trajan was trying to stop Christianity—not support it.

          Now then

          Who by the words of the NEW TESTAMENT is Jesus Christ said to BE or represent here on Earth?

          Jesus has “all authority on heaven and Earth” (Mt. 28:18) (what about Caesar ????)

          book of Acts, the disciples twice disobey “government” (Caesar) in order to obey Christ (Acts 4:19; 5:29)

          a) Now start back at verse 13 (CrownCorona), WHO are they talking to, (government(idea of))

          “Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated, common men, they were astonished. And they recognized that they had been with Jesus. But seeing the man who was healed standing beside them, they had nothing to say in opposition. But when they had commanded them to leave the council, they conferred with one another, saying, h“What shall we do with these men? For that a notable sign has been performed through them is evident to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it. 17 But in order that it may spread no further among the people, let us warn them jt speak no more to anyone in this” name.” So they called them and charged them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus.

          What was the response,

          Acts 4:19–20

          “But Peter and John answered them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.”

          (Not Government or Caesar)

          How about this

          Now then again acts 5 27-32

          And when they had brought them, they set them before the council. And the high priest questioned them, saying, “We strictly charged you not to teach in this name, yet here you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching, and you intend to bring this man’s blood upon us.” But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men. The God of our fathers raised Jesus, whom you killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior, to give prepentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him.”

          Caesar was “King” Caesar was “law” Caesar was “word” is that not the story…..so who then do they talk about that is Bigger than Caesar?

          SO then I will not even go into the multiple books that the different styles and complexity of the entire volume and those left out. That alone is to much for this simple mans theory to withstand. And that those that KNEW Jesus the Christ still lived when this so called “hoax ” roman invention started. That alone should give you pause Jerusalem was a Metropolitan City not some small town Burg. The same bible says that People came from all over to that city, All colors of the rainbow.

          Now then the Question,

          Why did Rome Invent a “God” that was More powerful than their own “Self Proclaimed God line” in the form of a “Man called Caesar”, This Created “God” to pacify the “jews” by Noting that in the end by Scripture was to return, not only to Rule this World again, but Destroy all that stood before? “Caesar” not withstanding and Rome but Dust in the wind with all the rest.

          Be mindful of what you cast unto other Ab and do the work needed to Properly Vent this. I could go on more however this is well past sufficient to still the Atwill.


            1. Dave j

              Please take the 5 minutes required to read the entire post the question is plainly listed at the bottom.

              Did you even read what I wrote?

              go to the last part.

              ——-“Now then the Question,

              Why did Rome Invent a “God” that was More powerful than their own “Self Proclaimed God line” in the form of a “Man called Caesar”, This Created “God” to pacify the “jews” by Noting that in the end by Scripture was to return, not only to Rule this World again, but Destroy all that stood before? “Caesar” not withstanding and Rome but Dust in the wind with all the rest.”

Leave a Reply