CC23-Simon and rockets in a vacuum

Be the 1st to vote.

Still hasn’t topped our 9 hour FAC.

Thanks, everyone. Please let us know what you think of our latest monstrosity of an audio … an unprecedented 7 hours of CluesForum meditations, including four new hours with a very special past guest! Issue 23: Hi, ‘Does Rocketry Work in the Vacuum?’

Source: View topic – The Clues Chronicle — help decide the threads to read! •…

On XRays and Nooklear radiation

Be the 1st to vote.

Great interchange in our #alchemical-hustle thread.

JustsayindudeYesterday at 7:24 PM

Ok so help me out here alchemical hustle Busters – I don’t buy, at all, not even slightly the nuke narrative and I am totally onboard with the overall atomic hoax. however in thinking about it I realised that there is a logical conflict that I can’t resolve that goes as follows my father was a vet and as I grew up I watched hundreds and hundreds of x-rays get taken by a very old, very simple looking X-ray machine the official narrative tells us there it is full of caesium (magic rocks) The device itself seemed very simple it plugged in, it had a small cone head, a shutter system with a light bulb and crosshairs that allowed you to adjust the rays that would emit from the machine to the size of the photographic plate. So here’s my question does anyone have a reasonable psychologist angle on x-ray machines? Especially would like to hear from @smj who can spot a hustle a mile off, but appreciate anyone’s input. Could magic rocks be partly true?
Fakeologist, not psychologist :eyes:

SilverbeamYesterday at 7:40 PM

I’ve had a few x-rays. It wasn’t faked.
There are radiative phenomena outside the visible light spectrum I’m pretty sure.
Is it a matter of so – small – they – are – invisible particles? Very hard to say.

JustsayindudeYesterday at 8:02 PM

Hmm, good point light vs particles. I know the imaging process works and we know that radiation passes through us all the time. I guess the question in my mind is does that radiation spray out of a material that is contained inside that device?


smjYesterday at 10:14 PM

roetgen rays came out of tubes. like crookes tubes andwhatnot. xrays are just another wavelength of that magical shit we call light. it can see thru skin but not barium andsoforth(edited)
alfred loomis’ tuxedo park mansion where he hung out with onestone et al is now the tube musuem. museum means institute of the muses of course……

JustsayindudeYesterday at 11:57 PM

Yeah, I’m down with light we can’t see, used to do Rf, it’s all light really. I guess the question is what generates the invisible light called xrays? Is it hot rocks, or have they hidden some kind of cathode ray tube in a very small housing since a long time ago? It would actually be easy to test, as in theory it would draw no current while firing. Anyone here got an xray machine?

October 18, 2017

JustsayindudeToday at 12:00 AM

Hmm, just checked, first machine built just a few weeks after xrays discovered. Hmmm:thinking:

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 1:39 AM

@Justsayindude Xray machines make disturbances in the Aether at higher frequency than light bulbs do.. that’s all
X-radiation (composed of X-rays) is a form of electromagnetic radiation. Most X-rays have a wavelength ranging from 0.01 to 10 nanometers, corresponding to frequencies in the range 30 petahertz to 30 exahertz (3×1016 Hz to 3×1019 Hz) and energi…

Nothing nukelar… entirely electromagnetic
the trick with all this is the use of the word RADIATION associated with NUKELA
If you hear the word RADIATION you get very, very, very nervous
@Justsayindude at the same time, i am not suggesting that EMR is nothing to be amazed at. The Creator really has made an astonishing world

JustsayindudeToday at 1:56 AM

Fair call, it’s a fancy light bulb. Funny old world. And, if that is the hustle, it’s perfect because no one is allowed to, or would be brave enough to pull one apart. That said, my test remains valid – if it draws current when it fires, it would prove the hustle. Haven’t got an xray at work have you Frank?

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 1:57 AM

@Justsayindude they do draw current. They are plugged into the mains
they are a fancy light bulb with “wave guides”
very similar to a CRT monitor
the Xrays are more harmful than microwaves

JustsayindudeToday at 1:59 AM

No, I know they are plugged in – that’s not the issue or the question. In theory, when firing the only thing that happens is lead shutters peel back to allow the caesium created rays out – no current required at that precise moment

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 2:00 AM

what is the Caesium connection?

JustsayindudeToday at 2:00 AM

At least that was my understanding, maybe I’m wrong

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 2:00 AM

no different in principle to a heat lamp
just a different wavelength

JustsayindudeToday at 2:01 AM

Radioactive material contained inside the machine – that’s the narrative… But now I’m doubting myself

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 2:01 AM

Ionising radiation hazard symbol

JustsayindudeToday at 2:02 AM

Off to check with uncle google

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 2:02 AM

looks very like the nukelar symbol doesn’t it?
roduction by electrons[edit] Characteristic X-ray emission lines for some common anode materials.[15][16] Anode material Atomic number Photon energy [keV] Wavelength [nm] K?1 K?1 K?1 K?1 W 74 59.3 67.2 0.0209 0.0184 Mo 42 17.5 19.6 0.0709 0.0632 Cu 29 8.05 8.91 0.154 0.139 Ag 47 22.2 24.9 0.0559 0.0497 Ga 31 9.25 10.26 0.134 0.121 In 49 24.2 27.3 0.0512 0.455 Spectrum of the X-rays emitted by an X-ray tube with a rhodium target, operated at 60 kV. The smooth, continuous curve is due to bremsstrahlung, and the spikes are characteristic K lines for rhodium atoms. X-rays can be generated by an X-ray tube, a vacuum tube that uses a high voltage to accelerate the electrons released by a hot cathode to a high velocity. The high velocity electrons collide with a metal target, the anode, creating the X-rays.[17] In medical X-ray tubes the target is usually tungsten or a more crack-resistant alloy of rhenium (5%) and tungsten (95%), but sometimes molybdenum for more specialized applications, such as when softer X-rays are needed as in mammography. In crystallography, a copper target is most common, with cobalt often being used when fluorescence from iron content in the sample might otherwise present a problem.
Xrays are created with a vacuum tube… just like an old television
or Cathode Ray Tube screen

JustsayindudeToday at 2:04 AM

I have just figured out I am officially an idiot – no idea where I got that idea from

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 2:04 AM

the same place we all get it from… we are DELIBERATELY given muddled data

JustsayindudeToday at 2:04 AM

Ah yes, lots of muddle to clear out. Sorry for wasting your time

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 2:05 AM

i consider time spent in what we just did to be the most productive use of “time”
your view of the falsehood of nukelar has been strengthened
and you will now be conscious of the number of people that think “radiation” and nukelar are the same thang

JustsayindudeToday at 2:12 AM

Yeah, funny, I already knew he difference, and the hustle. Now I’m just dumbfounded how I had that understanding in my head. Ah well, as someone who discovered fakery, finding out I’m wrong is nothing new
Got mixed up with this narrative somewhere along the line Devices Gauging devices are used to measure, monitor, and control the thickness of sheet metal, textiles, paper napkins, newspaper, plastics, photographic film, and other products as they are manufactured. Nonportable gauging devices (i.e., gauges mounted in fixed locations) are designed for measurement or control of material density, flow, level, thickness, or weight, and so forth. The gauges contain sealed sources that radiate through the substance being measured to a readout or controlling device. Portable gauging devices, such as moisture density gauges, are used at field locations. These gauges contain a gamma-emitting sealed source, usually cesium-137, or a sealed neutron source, usually americium-241 and beryllium.

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 3:03 AM

@Justsayindude the first radiation emitting substance was “radium” “discovered” by Marie and Pierre Curie
Radium was discovered long before “nuclear physics” existed
@Justsayindude . this entry says that Radium WAS USED in portabe X ray machines… so YOU WERE CORRECT!!!
Marie Sk?odowska Curie (; French: [ky?i]; Polish: [k?i?ri]; 7 November 1867 – 4 July 1934; born Maria Salomea Sk?odowska; [?marja sal??m?a skw??d?fska]) was a Polish and naturalized-French physicist and chemist who conducted pioneer…

JustsayindudeToday at 3:08 AM

Thanks @anounceofsaltperday i was struggling with some serious self doubt there

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 3:10 AM

Now i am trying to find what her theory of radiation was… the one she won the nobel prize for
such answers do not come easily
a key point here… Lastly, certain of the radioactive substances have a special property which bears no direct relation to their beams. This is to make temporarily radioactive all the bodies in their neighbourhood, by producing a radioactive emanation which communicates the radioactive property to the surroundings.
I now conclude that Uranium is “made radioactive” by being radiated upon
Radioactivity is simply what the name implies, substances which emit Electromagnetic Radiation… EMR

Substances like Caesium etc must be like rechargeable batteries of EMR
They call the discharging of energy of Caesium etc “Half life”
so that means we have made brilliant use of the past hour of our lives @Justsayindude
and we can confirm that “radioactive materials” simply give off the same rays as Electric X Ray tubes

JustsayindudeToday at 3:31 AM

Hey, good call. That is actually significant

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 3:32 AM

yes… i think we have tumbled it
@Justsayindude as an aside, have you watched Netflix show “The Good Place” ?

JustsayindudeToday at 3:39 AM

Can’t say I have

anounceofsaltperdayToday at 4:00 AM

a VERY interesting show
about the afterlife

JustsayindudeToday at 5:20 AM

Hey Frank ( @anounceofsaltperday ), appreciate the heads up, but don’t have netflix. Anywho, the more I think about it, the more I think, that is a bit of a major. On the one hand, you have magic hot rocks releasing magic xrays. On the other hand, you have a copper/gold/iron etc cathode dunked in low pressure inert gas releasing xrays. Boomshakalakah baby, magic hot rocks not required. Metal, electricity and gas equals magic hot rocks. That is NOT insignificiant.
Well done

More to the Weinstein event than meets the eye

rickylikes this

Rich people that own the media don’t get thrown under the bus and dragged behind it willingly. I think Weinstein is in on it – in a way that will only help him. I think this because I am a contrarian first and a fakeologist second.

Miles, as usual, has quite a take on the story. As conspiratorial as his take is, I’ll take it over the MSM take any day. It’s further proof that we have no idea what game is being played in the media, and by who.

Tying Harvey Weinstein
to the Las vegas Event
As usual, this is just my opinion, take it or leave it
Yep, you read that right. There is a link between the two events. They didn’t come out almost
simultaneously by accident.

FAC375-More Vegas Chatter

rickylikes this

Full board of fakeologists: Ab, Delcroix, Notsofreemason, Typo, Napoleon Wilson, Tom Dalpra, Herose

In the last 20 minutes, I read from Miles Mathis’ latest piece on Las Vegas.

Donate to keep the audios going. Just $1.19/month!

MM on Las Vegas

Be the 1st to vote.

This is the “dark web” of the Las Vegas research – ie. as deep as most, like me, will go.

Interesting how Fetzer is allegedly up MilesMathis’ butt.

Go read the whole thing – again.

Addendum October 14, 2017: This will be my last addendum, since I suspect one reason these events are run is to keep researchers like me off more important topics. It is all about misdirection, as we know. Sometimes I feel like it is me versus all the psychological operations units worldwide—and they are still losing. Before I get to the point of this addendum, I wanted to mention that Jim Fetzer has now joined the group of trolls spamming my inbox. He is sending me large files unasked-for. Funny that I don’t read Fetzer or email him, but he finds the need to read me and email me more than once a day. It just proves I am now part of his pathetic assignment. All these bozos have been assigned the task of surrounding my research with noise. They aren’t doing a very good job of it, are they?

Anyway, I am getting a lot of emails from tools and fools who are still convinced people died in Las Vegas. I have been sent the victims list as the perfect proof of this, and I agree that it is the perfect proof. . . of a hoax. Before we hit the individual names, just notice that very few of these people have middle names on the main list. Only three of 58 have middle names. That is a red flag off the top. Also a disproportionate number of Jewish names. Also, why are they alphabetized by their first names? I will start with the “fishiest” name on the list: Denise Salmon Burditus. Just looks fake, doesn’t it? Maybe now we know why they didn’t give the others middle names. If they had, they would have names like cod, flounder, seabass, and trout. Anyway, they have a listing for her at…, but it is still a big red flag. To start with, although allegedly 50 years old, she has worked at only one place: Heritage Financial Group, Inc. That is suspicious immediately, given what we uncovered above.

But if we do a quick search on Heritage Financial, it gets even worse. Although said to manage businesses in several states, its website is a single white half-page that looks like it was just created last night on a Big Chief tablet. That’s the whole enchilada. I think DHS needs to hire a better tech team to fake these pages. That is just pathetic.… also has a page for her, and it tells us she has also lived in Joint Base Lewis- McChord, WA. Oooo, that sounds good! What is that? It is a military base, and its scary webpage starts by telling you that you are accessing a restricted site, authorized for government use only. You are warned there that the USG routinely intercepts and monitors communications on this site for, among other things, “counterintelligence investigations”. Intrigued? So yeah, this lady seems like a normal attendee at a country music concert. At least we have indication she has worked at other places than Heritage Financial. What could those places be, I wonder?

Well, Joint Base Lewis-McChord is the site of 12th Psychological Operations Group. It is connected to the 324th and 349th in Aurora, CO, and the 353rd in Las Vegas. Also the 14th Psychological Operations Battalion in Mountain View, CA, which links us to some of these other alleged victims. Mountain View also links us to the tech companies I mentioned above, all owned in part by Vanguard. Remember, Mountain View is the home of Google, Mozilla, Symantec, Intuit, LinkedIn, and many other tech companies. It was the home of Schockley Semiconductors, which we saw in my paper on Steve Jobs. So it looks like we have found another one of the keys to this event: Psychological Operations. We have intuited this was a major psyop from the get-go, but here we see it is hard-linked to many actual Psychological Operations Groups. We may infer that this is where the planning was done, and some of the fake victims were apparently taken from the vicinities.

Although I have shown you that many of these people may have been made up, I concede that it is possible some of them died the week of the Las Vegas event (from natural or other causes—car wrecks,bungee jumping accidents, slot-machine fatalities, etc.) and were simply inserted into this list later.
We have seen evidence of that in other events, such as the Gabby Giffords shooting. I also remind you that we have seen people in previous events fake their deaths when they go into Intelligence. This is how they go undercover. So, again, it is possible a few of these people were recently recruited into covert ops, and were inserted into this list for that reason. This would explain why even some of those close to them believe they died. Some of my readers can’t understand how that works, but that is how it works. Therefore, if you hear from someone you trust that so-and-so has died, it is possible that trustworthy person really believes it, and may have seen good evidence of it. Not perfect evidence, but good evidence. But just because a trustworthy person tells you something doesn’t mean it is true. It just means they have been fooled by someone. It isn’t that hard to accomplish. You see it all the time in the movies, and have no trouble believing it then. But for some reason people don’t believe this happens in real life. It does. The military does stuff like this everyday, and has for centuries.

And, truth be told, people aren’t only gullible, they have a morbid streak a mile wide. Although they would deny it, most people want to believe in serial killers and mass murderers. That is my experience. They are very attached to the macabre, and don’t want to give it up. It would take a certain light out of their boring lives. I figured this out after Sandy Hook. I thought people would be happy to know those children weren’t shot in the face, but I found that wasn’t the case. They actually got angry at me for suggesting it to them. How dare I take their ghoulish glee away from them? We see the same thing here, and I have to say that it seems women have a stronger attraction to the blood and guts than men do. They will try to tell you it is because they are more compassionate, and I used to believe that. I no
longer do. They are attached to these events in a way that is foreign to me, but it doesn’t look like compassion. As I say, it looks like a simple—or not so simple—fascination with the macabre. Remember, slasher movies are made for women, and they flock to them. Is that explained by compassion? No. Compassion is primal, and women have their fair share of it, but something else primal is being tapped in these bloody events. The governors know what they are doing, and they can control you via either your finer or your baser instincts. That is, unless you learn to control yourself.

Dark web

Be the 1st to vote.

I facetiously asked in a past audiochat about the dark web, saying I didn’t see much evidence for it. I was speaking out of ignorance, but this post does a good job of educating.Deep web - scheme

I think many of you will be surprised to learn some new, less known facts about the internet, the digital wonderland of the 21st century. We all know that the internet is huge, right? It would take us months or even years to Google search and find every single existing internet page. But did you know that all that we can find with Google, Bing, Yandex or any other »classic« search engine represents only a small fraction of what the web offers? The small fraction is only the tip of the iceberg — a traditiona

Source: The Internet’s Dark Web | Vexman’s Thoughts