Re: UK related articles
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:33 am
Why Andrew Bridgen Was Cancelled
Some hard subjects covered in that interview. And anyone in the UK who knew a lot of elderly people knows when many of them suddenly died. And are also aware of this comment by the arse rag Gary Lineker, who was expressing the sentiments of the rest of the media of wishing the elderly dead after the vote didn't go their way.
Remainers dark dig at Leave voters who ‘will be dead before Brexit'
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/74450 ... heresa-May
When we hear the clapping seals in the media speak, it's hard to believe the UK parliamentary system specifically has secret ballots built in exactly so evil people with political agendas cannot then scapegoat individuals for voting the way they choose best for their own families and future. And cannot use the results to create death lists to remove their opposition.
To get round that safeguard we have opinion polls where media people make up numbers in an attempt to push agendas. They choose the target to put in their crosshairs and then use the full force of the media to destroy them. I bang on about BREXIT because it lifted the stone on their ways of working and we find there is nothing but crawling woodlice underneath.
POLLS running up to BREXIT had REMAIN winning by at least 52 percent to 48, that's based on a survey of 1000 people a poll. Then around 26,000,000 people voted in the actual election and REMAIN lost. Then directly afterwards we have media reports literally starting the day after the vote saying "Brexit Buyers' Remorse" were the media publish REMAINERS are now 52 percent to 48 percent and we should cancel the result. That's based on the standard 1000 people surveyed. Ignore the actual vote of 26,000,000 and instead go with a view of 1000 people that they assure us is-a-cross-section-of-the-public. Yep, that's the media in a nutshell.
The number of people who regret voting for Brexit is now greater than the margin of victory for Leave
https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit- ... ?r=US&IR=T
This is one of many many articles that came out in 2016 after the vote. Trying to use a survey typically of a thousand people to wipe out the result of a Referendum of the entire country. Hey OVERLORDS, if you didn't want the answer, you shouldn't have asked the bloody question, should you?
How much money was pissed up the wall on the Referendum that you intended as a rubber-stamping exercise in preparation for the GREAT RESET? So you could say, it's not us BRO, it's the EU. The exact same thing you are now trying to pass through the WHO. It's not us BRO, it's the WHO calling another (FAKE) pandemic. ...The fake terror attacks, the fake death of Jo Cox, and all those flowers and the fake celebrations of her life, and the people who wrote her fake wiki bios, etc, etc, etc. All that, when the woman who played her character is still a sitting MP in the Labour party? ...You think people don't see your utter corruption?
Some hard subjects covered in that interview. And anyone in the UK who knew a lot of elderly people knows when many of them suddenly died. And are also aware of this comment by the arse rag Gary Lineker, who was expressing the sentiments of the rest of the media of wishing the elderly dead after the vote didn't go their way.
Remainers dark dig at Leave voters who ‘will be dead before Brexit'
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/74450 ... heresa-May
When we hear the clapping seals in the media speak, it's hard to believe the UK parliamentary system specifically has secret ballots built in exactly so evil people with political agendas cannot then scapegoat individuals for voting the way they choose best for their own families and future. And cannot use the results to create death lists to remove their opposition.
To get round that safeguard we have opinion polls where media people make up numbers in an attempt to push agendas. They choose the target to put in their crosshairs and then use the full force of the media to destroy them. I bang on about BREXIT because it lifted the stone on their ways of working and we find there is nothing but crawling woodlice underneath.
POLLS running up to BREXIT had REMAIN winning by at least 52 percent to 48, that's based on a survey of 1000 people a poll. Then around 26,000,000 people voted in the actual election and REMAIN lost. Then directly afterwards we have media reports literally starting the day after the vote saying "Brexit Buyers' Remorse" were the media publish REMAINERS are now 52 percent to 48 percent and we should cancel the result. That's based on the standard 1000 people surveyed. Ignore the actual vote of 26,000,000 and instead go with a view of 1000 people that they assure us is-a-cross-section-of-the-public. Yep, that's the media in a nutshell.
The number of people who regret voting for Brexit is now greater than the margin of victory for Leave
https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit- ... ?r=US&IR=T
This is one of many many articles that came out in 2016 after the vote. Trying to use a survey typically of a thousand people to wipe out the result of a Referendum of the entire country. Hey OVERLORDS, if you didn't want the answer, you shouldn't have asked the bloody question, should you?
How much money was pissed up the wall on the Referendum that you intended as a rubber-stamping exercise in preparation for the GREAT RESET? So you could say, it's not us BRO, it's the EU. The exact same thing you are now trying to pass through the WHO. It's not us BRO, it's the WHO calling another (FAKE) pandemic. ...The fake terror attacks, the fake death of Jo Cox, and all those flowers and the fake celebrations of her life, and the people who wrote her fake wiki bios, etc, etc, etc. All that, when the woman who played her character is still a sitting MP in the Labour party? ...You think people don't see your utter corruption?