- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 8 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
“The more we do to you,the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”
Joseph Mengele
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/585304-the-more-we-do-to-you-the-less-you-seem-to
If the greatest band in history, The Beatles can be comprised of numerous doubles, perhaps we can find double trouble with the greatest rock band in history, the Rolling Stones? Keith Richards was replaced, imho, in the late 60’s with 2 subsequent doubles. Here is the real Richards:
A couple pf screen shots are below
Here is the first replacement with his evil band mates paying homage to the Big Boss Man:
And again:
Replacement Keith getting up close and personal:
note the teeth at:58 sec mark
Now go to the 3:28 mark below and see the original Keith and his teeth.
Pix of second replacement below.
The first double had bigger eyes than Keith, that’s why he began to wear a make up. And he also was wearing a nose silicone piece.[See the interview above. The nose piece is readily apparent] You can easily identify the first double by the changed hairdo (hair stood up).
The first double had bigger eyes than Keith – this is the main marker to differ him from real Keith. There’s also a difference in face form, muscles around the mouth. lips lenth, lenth of the chin (shorter chin), eyes distance (wider set eyes) but they are too slight. You cannot point your finger on them. But due to all of them the double gives an overall different impression, when you get used to photos.
Another main marker is the skin. Real Keith’s skin is white, looks even and soft. He was always clean shaven. The replacememnt’s skin is rugged, and he seems to have much denser and darker facial hair.
So, the eyes size and form, and the skin.
to be continued
Continuing on Keith Richard and both of his replacements…
Here’s Feith 2, the second replacement, who appeared in mid seventies. In analogy with The Beatles, the first replacement was much better (can be compared with Cheatles 1964-1966), while the second one doesn’t remind us of Keith at ll, like Sgt, Pepperish Featles doesn’t remind folks of The Lads.
1978
1982
Go to 3:27 mark below
to be continued
I will not even compare Keith2 with real Keith, because it is obvious that it is not him. I will compare him with Feith1 (first replacement from late sixties), I place three comps below.
The first double’s eyes are bigger than of real Keith, but the second double’s eyes are even BIGGER. They are huge and dark – that’s why even more make up. His nose is way longer and has a bump. His face is wider than Feith1’s. Lips are even longer and the upper lip is flat.
OK, the last one is comp of real Keith with Feith2, just for a laugh…
🙂
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.