Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Sorry for the delay in replying, Lenny.
Here is a link I think you find interesting regarding the origins of double. It deals with a series of Betty Boop cartoons. Notice the plot of the cartoon is the development of celebrities from birth.
Here is another link to the same cartoon dealing with masonic initiation.
You may research Max Fleischer for an interesting background.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Fleischer
I am not convinced the Beatles were cloned but the mystery and depth of the operation I believe to be on a scale you suggest. If you go to this link and contact the moderator “Essence”, tell her I sent you and she said she would provide you with a free one month membership if you care to explore the trick subject of the Beatles replacement. I enjoyed reading your detailed post.
Tom if you were interested in the height differences of the various Beatles here are 2 links to explore.
http://www.thebeatlesneverexisted.com/Heights/
(I don’t like this site because they say The Lads never existed, but they are good at finding photo discrepancies)
And then there is this video on height differences:
(this is a PID stuff, but still a good one)
People noticed long ago that Beatles differ in height towards each other through the years.
@Lenny
About mimicking voices… Turns out there are people who are not even working for CIA, but for film industry, who can teach you to mimic ANY voice to which you are genetically close to. It is called Voice Matching. It is used in voiceover of the movies. Check this outhttp://podcasts.voices.com/voi…erts_episode_35.html
Quote from link…
“So, how did I land this job and I how can I teach others to do the same (mimicking voices)? Well, there are two factors, one I know my voice range, so I can recognize voices I’m naturally close too. So, it’s a matter of recognizing that I’m genetically in the ballpark, believe me I wouldn’t be going after a sound alike job for Ben Affleck or Matt Damon. So, knowing my genetic vocal print is 80% of the job, then two I have the skills to tweak the voice to bring it closer to the sound of the performer I’m trying to match or mimic. So, that’s brings to the 90% and that’s as close as it gets.”
So, looks like it is very possible to be trained to match other voice. Imagine what techniques intelligence has for that! As we know, all Hollywood “effects” are a feeble semblance of what intelligence has on their hands.
Sorry Lenny but there was a typo-the line should read “The short answer is the doubles did not sound the same.
The culprits had plenty to choose from. I placed on attachment a picture of the Liverpool bands competing for success at the time the Beatles were discovered.
Also, last summer I had a long debate with Dave McGowan on his Facebook page about the issue of doubles and Beatles replacements. He told me he wanted to have a rational discussion on the topic of Paul being replaced. He posed a set of questions for me and specifically asked me respond to the list of seven. One question he wanted me to answer was how they could find someone who looked the same and sounded the same as the original. Plus how could people not notice the switch.
First off, I told him that at the time there were many people who did notice e.g. Lenny.
Second, finding a double is not as difficult as people believe. Here is a link to a photographer who specializes in finding them:
Note it only took him a year or so to find these doubles.
MI5 would have had access to more resources than the photographer, including passport photos, etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI5
Here is how they found doubles for accused Martin Luther King assassin James Earl Ray.
“Researcher Philip Melanson has written that Ray used aliases which matched actual people living in Montreal, and began using those aliases before he first arrived there during his pre-assassination travels: “four of the five aliases used by Ray in the nine months preceding the crime were real Canadians who lived in close proximity to each other.” These people – Eric S. Galt, Raymond George Sneyd, Paul E. Bridgeman – all lived within a couple of miles of each other in Toronto, and all looked very similar to Ray. Galt and Willard, another Toronto resident whose name Ray used, both had scars on the right side of their faces, as Ray did. Though Ray had used aliases throughout his criminal career, there is no evidence Ray had been to Toronto prior to fleeing there after the King murder, and no explanation for how he came to use these particular names.”
Source:
https://www.maryferrell.org/wi…r_King_AssassinationThe intelligence agencies found a collection of doubles in a relatively small area. It can be done.
Please look closely at the second picture I placed on attachment. It is one of the George Harrison doubles next to the original. The original is on the left.
McGowan asked me how they could find doubles that sound the same. The short answer is the double sound the same.
Look at these two videos of the real Beatles vs. one set of doubles Beatle replacement researchers call The Cheatles. These are two clips of Twist and Shout performed live, the first by real Beatles in 1963 in Manchester, the second by Cheatles in 1965 in Italy. If you listen to them using headphones, you’ll hear what it means to be TAUGHT to sing like another person (second clip). I can hear that John singing is effortless, while Fohn is making so much effort trying to stay within certain voice pitch. And still he fails to sound exactly like John.
What a difference between the two. John and Paul could harmonize perfectly together. Sir faul and fohn sound horrible. No harmonizing at all.
If people listen to the real Joan Baez sing vs. the phony you hear the same thing…a free spirit vs. controlled singing.
People can be trained to mimic other singers but not the real talent. McGowan said the real McCartney continued in brilliance for almost 50 years. I argue no he did not. “Paul McCartney” and Wings was one of the lamest bands ever. “Silly Love Songs”, “Listen to what the man said” “Coming Up’, ecch!! The impostor was a talented mimic
Of course a double cold be trained in singing and with EMI’s studio magic, who knows?
Here is a video on the use of body doubles today. When you consider these are for propaganda films you see who is behind the idea.
For more info go to: http://pid.hoop.la/about
Hope that helps, Lenny!
Re Cochran’s guitar
From the Golden Bough by Sir James Frazer.“Chapter 3. Sympathetic Magic.
Section 3. Contagious Magic.
THUS far we have been considering chiefly that branch of sympathetic magic which may be called homoeopathic or imitative. Its leading principle, as we have seen, is that like produces like, or, in other words, that an effect resembles its cause. The other great branch of sympathetic magic, which I have called Contagious Magic, proceeds upon the notion that things which have once been conjoined must remain ever afterwards, even when quite dissevered from each other, in such a sympathetic relation that whatever is done to the one must similarly affect the other. Thus the logical basis of Contagious Magic, like that of Homoeopathic Magic, is a mistaken association of ideas; its physical basis, if we may speak of such a thing, like the physical basis of Homoeopathic Magic, is a material medium of some sort which, like the ether of modern physics, is assumed to unite distant objects and to convey impressions from one to the other. The most familiar example of Contagious Magic is the magical sympathy which is supposed to exist between a man and any severed portion of his person, as his hair or nails; so that whoever gets possession of human hair or nails may work his will, at any distance, upon the person from whom they were cut. This superstition is world-wide; instances of it in regard to hair and nails will be noticed later on in this work…”
One might add guitar as well. Anyhow, it worked for Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now as the Golden Bough was casually on display on Kurtz’s nightstand.
Source:http://www.sacred-texts.com/pag/frazer/gb00303.htm
MB had Cochrane’s “Summertime Blues” as his encore. Put on a pair of righteous headphones and crank it! Yeaaah!
“33 Anniversary of Marc Bolan’s Death”
the 9:04 mark
@Xileffilex, et.al do you’ll have any evidence to support your claim the Bolan crash was faked? For example, I can assert Robin Williams death was suspicious and point to the Family Guy episode on the day of his death, the non-sensical details of his demise, etc. Likewise, I can assert that RFK death was faked and point to the behavior of his sister at the podium in the Ambasador Hotel or the fake looking photos of RFK. Ditto for JFK.
Please go to the 8:30 mark of this video
MB mentions the black magician he met and numerology. The license plate “Fox 66 il” works out as a triple 6. F-o-x = 6+ 15 (1+5=6) + 24 (2+4)= 6 6 6 + 66=18+ 6 =26 =2+6 =6. Did Bolan have this personalized license plate in order to bring him “luck”, much like a horseshoe above door?
Watch David Bowie, whom Blue Moon mentioned. Go to the 1:04 mark
Witness the lightning bolt in a circle suspended above the stage. It is visible throughout the concert. Query: Why does Ziggy Stardust have the classic Luciferian/satanic symbol of a lighting bolt over his stage…clever marketing or tribute? Is it a talisman/charm to bless his endeavor? Is his audience aware of the allusion?
“…And he said unto the, “I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.”
Luke 10:18The motif of cars runs as a thread throughout Bolan’s career. At the 3:13 mark of the above video, MB mentioned his inspiration Eddie Cochran, who perished in an auto accident.
Just a few of the songs:
“Cadillac” + “Jeepster” first 2 songs of concert“Jeepster”
“just like a car
You’re pleasing to behold
I’ll call you Jaguar
If I may be so bold”“Buick Mckane”
A charismatic performer nonpareil.
“Since we last loved Gloria
the suns been up and down that many times…
You gave me reason now I’ve gotta roam
‘cos the road I’m on gal won’t run me home”
“The Road I’m On (Gloria)”The above song was written and performed by Bolan in 1965. Gloria Jones was the driver of the car Bolan was killed in.
Are we to presume the car leitmotif was woven into the Bolan legend in anticipation of his faked death almost 15 years down the road? (pardon the pun“…In early 1977, Bolan got a new band together, released a new album, Dandy in the Underworld, and set out on a fresh UK tour, taking along punk band the Damned as support to entice a young audience who did not remember his heyday. Granada Television commissioned Bolan to front a six-part series called Marc, where he introduced new and established bands and performed his own songs. By this time Bolan had lost weight, appearing as trim as he had during T. Rex’s earlier heyday. The show was broadcast during the post-school half-hour on ITV earmarked for children and teenagers; it was a big success…”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Bolan
As the link posted by Xileffilex states: Bolan died in the midst of a popular show. That is evidence for faking it?
As a responsible fakeologist I consider the faked death angle when I learned he was cremated but abandoned it when I subsequently learned that cremation is not unusual in England.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_cremation_rate
The word glamour means spell.
Origin: Early 18th century (originally Scots in the sense ‘enchantment, magic’): alteration of grammar. Although grammar itself was not used in this sense, the Latin word grammatica (from which it derives) was often used in the Middle Ages to mean ‘scholarship, learning’, including the occult practices popularly associated with learning.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/glamour
Watch MB performance on Don Kirsner’s rock concert.
Even at his drug addled, bloated, Spinal Tap best, the man had charisma.
To sum up: a decade+ long career immersed in Tolkien Druidism and Detroit automotives. PSYOP or Sorcery?
Denying the occult nature of the Hidden Power while trying to disclose media fakery?… It’s tough to be a Fakeologist, if the subject of occult seems ridiculous for it’s members…
THAT WAS LONG TANGENT AWAY FROM JOAN BEAZ AND REPLACEMENT. HERE IN IS JOAN BAEZ 3 YEAR’s apart.
1965
1968
IMHO the voice and face are different. We may agree to disagree as fakeologists.
😯 😯 😐“Coincidence killed the professor.”
“The White People”
Arthur Machen“I don’t particularly believe that I come from this planet. ”
Doomed Glam rocker Marc Bolan@ Blue Moon “..As for SATAN SATAN SATAN!!! That’s a load of malarkey- The motivation is separating the public from their cash, just like any other capitalist scheme-
I know how tempting it is to be in on a SECRET,..”Please study the career trajectory of the original glam rocker Marc Bolan. Bolan said before he became famous he had a meeting in Paris with a black magician.
In the book link below, “Bolan commented that he had met some “amazing people” in his lifetime that didn’t fit the normal definition of the word human.
Some writers have argued that Bolan’s meeting with a black magician in Paris is apocryphal. One author who thought this wrote an article I linked below. Here are some quotes:
“…in Bolan’s lyrics Inca kings and Celtic witches dallied with mythological animals in dappled fairy groves.”
“The duo’s next album Unicorn has hints of Marc’s pop ambitions. True, its songs are all about wizards, white stars and sea beasts.”
“Mickey Finn was someone whose existence was irrevocably altered by meeting Marc Bolan: “I remember he turned up in along black cloak with a hood, and his hair, and his little ballet shoes with a gilded strap.
What did you think of him?
“I thought he’d come to put a spell on me. He probably did. I still don’t know.”
The writer of this says Bolan made up the magician story but ignores the significance of the above lyrics, the Druid symbolism in so many songs, including his 1st big hit “Ride a Swan”, not to mention his curious death.
http://www.pauldunoyer.com/pages/journalism/journalism_item.asp?journalismID=289
@Blue Moon and Tom Dalpra- I have a question “Did Marc Bolan undergo an initiation for fame? When Marc talked about him being from another planet, is he referring to a spirit in him? Was a spirit responsible for Marc’s charisma?”
Marc Bolan died in a car crash rife synchronicities. A synchronicity is a meaningful coincidence.
Watch his performance of the song “Solid Gold Easy Action”
and read the accompanying article. The line “”Life is the same and it always will be / Easy as picking foxes from a tree,” …”Turns out that the license plate on the car that Bolan was killed in on Sept. 16, 1977, was “FOX 661L.” And oh yeah, it was wrapped around a tree.”
Marc Bolan was a self confessed Druid. The Druids believed trees held spirits.
Read More: Marc Bolan – Famous Musicians Who Correctly Predicted Their Own Death | http://ultimateclassicrock.com…s/?trackback=tsmclip
http://ultimateclassicrock.com…dicted-their-deaths/Watch this performance and listen to the imagery of the lyrics and the use of the hexagram in the tv broadcast.
The show is “Top of the Pops” hosted by accused satanic pedophile Jimmy Saville.
For the readers who have rubbed elbows with elites in the music business, I have a question about Bolan’s death: “Can coincidence can be summoned?”
Bolan was the archetype of Androgynous rock star. Was Marc Bolan’s death a sacrifice to bless the genre of androgynous glamour rock, ensuing the success of David Bowie etc? Was his contract up? Did the “force”, the “force” responsible for his charisma and success leave him?
“What I am concerned with is calling down from the Heavens the energy that should go into a song”
Marc BolanBelow, Bolan christens the path for glam punkers with the blessing of Jimmy Saville.
Fakeologoists have discussed the use of occult numbers in PSYOPS, the occult symbolism in monuments in our nation’s capitals, propitious dates, etc. Occultists do so, it is argued, in order to draw negative energy to bless their endeavors. Was Marc Bolan “charged” with negative energy resulting in fame and popularity greater than the Beatles and Rolling Stones circa 1971?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Bolan “… At this time T. Rex record sales accounted for about 6 percent of total British domestic record sales. The band was reportedly selling 100,000 records a day;…)
I think the “people” behind Marc Bolan, his EMI affiliations through his “producer” Toni Visconti, would know. They were part of The Evil behind the replaced Beatles. Ringo Starr made a concert documentary about the doomed glam rocker.
Was Marc Bolan sacrificed after the the hurley burley/ After the battle had been lost and won?
Why does Marc Bolan talk about meeting black magicians, etc. Why does Joan Baez write songs like “You Don’t Have to Play Me Backwards” about ritual sacrifices in a church? So they can feel important?
We are living in the Age of Must Be, The Making Manifest of All That is Hidden as James Shelby Downard prophesied. Downard said he spent his life studying the grand occult conspiracy to turn us into cybernetic mystery zombies. We are there. Fakeologists and others on the internet talk about the Revelation of the Method, where we are told what is being done to us. They aver that the culprits are doing so to exonerate them of guilt, etc. Wrong. Go read the original Rosicrucian Manifestos, as I did. There it is written, that “when we have the public ritually bound, we will confess our secrets.”
I asked Fakeologists before if Sandy Hook was botched on purpose. I believe it was, complete with the Anderson Cooper/James Tracy masonic psychodrama. Revelations about the hoax are furthering our psychic enslavement, deepening our hypnosis and our spiritual paralysis. We are left ritually bound.
The Bible teaches there is one sin that God does not forgive: blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Through God’s Grace, the Holy Spirit reveals truth to us. The reason the other side uses “The Revelation of the Method” is to damn our souls through our committing the sin of denying the spirit of truth. They confess their secrets. We know the truth. We can not say we didn’t know. With our occult Apple phones, and the dog start goddess Siri answering our questions, we have family entertainment about ritual child sacrifice with survivors being sold into child prostitution (The Hunger Games). Meanwhile for the adults, Fifty Shades of how to make your own S + M sex slave. In our minds our government fights the goddess of witchcraft ISIS while we immerse ourselves further into a virtual world gleaming with Illuminist imagery.
Cybernetic mystery zombies.
We underestimate The Hustle.
Lenny, here is a link you may try for the Beatles contract:
http://store.paulfrasercollectibles.com/The-Beatles-Brian-Epstein-First-Signed-Contract-p/pt350.htm
On the left of the page there are photos of all contract pages. Clause G (about hiring doubles) is on photo 3.
I believe that in Beatles times there still were some who were “ordinary” people, I mean without any intell/illuminati background, chosen due to their talent, with an intent to be corrupted and used in the future.Knowing the Lads’ background, knowing about their families, seeing their youth photos, I can see they were working class boys, talented, self-made, determined to become rock stars. I don’t know when exactly they were noticed and chosen (I suspect when they started to play at local clubs in Liverpool), but they were certainly not groomed from their childhood, because they didn’t look groomed at all.
@Lenny…you have hit the nail on the head. You understand the situation perfectly. This tricky topic is 3 dimensional, complex and multilayered…
Point One: “Why replace?”
Blue Moon wrote: “To overstate the case by arguing that one asset has been replaced by a similar looking asset is really gilding the lily”
@Blue Moon: Intell “assets” are not replaced, real talented people are.
Re: the point Tom Dalpra raised elsewhere about the talents of these individual stars being inimitable and irreplaceable, so therefore “why would they bother to replace them?
Lenny wrote: “…The first is, the individual artist at this elite level may well, and in many cases clearly does, possess individual genius and ability: the voice, the charisma, the looks, and the ability to write and perform unique material. ..”
Yes.
I think the main problem people have is they do not see A REASON FOR REPLACING PEOPLE, especially celebrities. If one doesn’t understand the reason, he or she cannot figure out why certain people go to so much trouble finding doubles, killing relatives, coaching replacements etc. He doesn’t know that it is worth it.
For many people the question is “Why replace some of the celebs, if you have power to create them from childhood?”
To answer why some celebrities are replaced, one has to go into spiritual. One must realize the answer is- “They” cannot create genius…cannot create genuine., charismatic, talented people. Because Satan cannot create anything, he can only try to fake it, duplicate it and then charge the fake with his powers stolen from The Creator by different means.
“They” search for such people, wait for them to show up… They can “smell” the Divine gift as sharks can smell blood. Then they hijack it. “They” use real talent and genuine emotions as an instrument, as a can opener for the mind. When the can is opened, the fake can start to work with the content. The original Beatles’ music had a transcendent, sublime, ethereal quality to it, a joire de vivre. Listen to “The Night Before” or “You’re Gonna Lose That Girl”
Lenny you understand this. I hope others will as well. Yes, we Fakeologists are smart,”scientific” and “objective”, yet the spiritual side of it the PSYOPS eludes us while it is the main thing that is behind it all.
The game is a spiritual one…spiritual discernment is a weapon missing in the Fakeologist armory.
“The world with all of its pomp and props is but the locale for the war for the soul which is the only reality.”
Michael A. Hoffman IITake those “fabricated” stars, mind controlled from childhood, did any of them had nearly as big impact on humanity, as real (and subsequently false) Beatles had?.. I think not. Yes, they are created, they are used, they serve certain purpose, but they are secondary. They are usually not replaced. They are material; they are not that important. When The Machine needs to accomplish real big and important tasks – it needs someone like The Lads. It needs a real deal.
911, moon hoax, etc, these subjects are interesting, but they are not “emotional”, they touch your reason, but not your heart. When it comes to the Beatles (and people’s replacements) – it is a totaly different story. People know what it’s like to love the Beatles, to be a life-long Beatles fan, and then to know one day that they were replaced in mid ’60’es. What then?
It really makes you feel fooled, cheated, it makes you feel *%$#@!!!.. and furious. And determined to know ALL the truth. And be very active. That’s what “They” are afraid of. The Beatles deal with your heart. That’s what “they” were trying to twist. When your thoughts and rational beliefs are twisted and you come to know about it, it makes you research things and dig deeper, but when your LOVE is twisted and you come to know it – a very powerful force comes to life. Love is the most powerful thing on the Earth, and those who are behind the Beatles PSYOP knew it all the way. That’s why they had to find The Lads and let them sing for 3 years, and make us love them.
Point Two: “How is it done?”
Lenny wrote:“…The second thing is, the genius of the Mass Culture Creators is in simulation, imitation and deception. It’s not in being original and authentic themselves. Their science lies in copying and bullshitting. The artist provides the creativity and nous, and from this original template they then construct the hoaxery and the psyOps.
At their hands, individual talent is able to be replicated, like expensive sports cars. “They have the technology!”And the individual artist is of secondary importance (dispensable even) once the “sound” and “image” is established and popularised, and calibrated within the particular psyOp they’re running. Should the original artist get sick, jack up, retire, or whatever, then he or she can be replaced if the psyOp’s not over yet. I think it’s that simple when you know how…”
Indeed…Remember: “They” use real talent and genuine emotions as an instrument, as a can opener for the mind. When the can is opened, the fake can start to work with the content.
Lenny wrote:
“…And as we are learning, these Hoaxers are extremely masterful at what they do. Fielding convincing body doubles using any manner of technologies, simulating unique voices and styles live and in the studio, churning out apparently “original material” that someone else wrote, all these things are eminently do-able and, I believe, being done. All the time.”It is not easy to identify doubles. We underestimate the skill of the opposition. I can understand that people don’t get it. I cannot blame them, because it took me time to “dig it” too. Remember the link I posted to the CIA expert in disguises –
“The detail of his natural looking prosthetics – whether a finger or hand, an ear, nose, orbit with ocular, full or partial face – is a marriage of artistry and science fused by his natural talents and more than twenty years as the Central Intelligence Agency’s top Advanced Disguise Specialist.”
http://medscope.blogspot.ru/2009/10/man-who-makes-faces.html
They have the detail down to matching the skin on the hands with the face. That is why I showed “Lennon” with is gloved skin
Here are a some facts about EMI, the power behind the Beatles. EMI did research and developed many hi-tech weapons and military equipment. They were literally A PART of a military industrial complex.
EMI was deeply involved in developing advanced computer/broadcasting/radar/microwave/photo equipment, also TV cameras… What could it be used for? Tampering EVERYTHING – sound, voices, images, videos… They control what we see and here. That’s what we see on every official Beatles/Featles DVD – they are blurry where they need to be blurry, etc. You can see it on youtube, because all the Beatles videos there are pieces of official DVDs. Who made them?.. EMI and BBC.
From Wiki
“During and after the Second World War, the EMI Laboratories in Hayes, Hillingdon developed radar equipment (including the receiver section of the British Army’s GL-II anti-aircraft fire-control radar), microwave devices such as the reflex klystron oscillator (having played a crucial role in the development of early production types following on from the British Admiralty Signal School’s pioneering NR89, the so-called “Sutton tube”), electro-optic devices such as infra-red image converters, and eventually guided missiles employing analogue computers.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMI
http://www.medicaldiscoverynews.com/shows/184_BeatlesCT-Scan.html
Picture on attachment-Military officer is going out of EMI building, holding documents…
Lenny, I do not have the link to original contract the Beatles signed for Brian Epstein. One of the strange things you will discover when researching the Beatles is material is scrubbed frequently. I have the pdf file of the Beatles contract but do not know how to post it here. The original link is dead.
If you can tell me how to post the pdf I will or google “Brian Epstein’s original contract with the Beatles.” The relevant section is section 2, paragraph g. I placed a couple pages on attachment
Joan Baez wrote in her autobiography, And a Voice to Sing With (Signet, 1987), that when she was a young girl, “most of the bright young Stanford scientists went off to Los Alamos, New Mexico, where the atomic bomb was being developed. My father recognized the potential destructive power of the unleashed atom even in those early days. So he took a job as a research physicist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.” Cornell was the home base of the CIA’s mind control experiments.
@Blue Moon, with all due respect, I believe you are underestimating how deep the hustle goes. Photographic evidence alone is not enough form a conclusion, to rely on it solely does violence to the issue. You must go beneath the surface and explore the constellation of people behind the replacement. More importantly, you must examine the politics the replacement serves. I am merely showing one technique for Fakeologists to explore.
Furthermore, to cite David McGowan only proves my point. Take McGowan’s Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon (WSIC) template of entertainer with military/intelligence backgrounds. Joan Baez could not be a better example*.
Look at her father’s connections to Cornell, MIT, etc. He was co-inventor of the x-ray microscope and did work with UNESCO, etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Baez
Joan Baez’s constellation of associates include Phil Ochs, Bob Dylan, Rich Farina, Cornel University Culture creators Thomas Pynchon, Kirkpatrick Sale etc.
As you would expect, her story is protected by the usual disinformation wrapped around nuggets of truth.
http://www.american-buddha.com/music.covertwarrock9.htm
https://sites.google.com/site/ofvampiresanddaisies/home/joan-baez-and-the-cia
http://www.conspirazzi.com/joan-baez-the-cia-mk-ultra/
Query: doubles are used in politics and intelligence spy craft but not in its most important ancillary field, the entertainment industry? Doubles for CIA politicians, CIA spys, etc. but not CIA entertainers? Fakeologists have speculated that Michael Jackson had replacements, that child actors are replaced as the enter adulthood, all to continue making money for their respective franchises. What about CIA entertainers who are replaced, not for filthy lucre, but to continue advancing The Agenda?
*Example:
Take the WSIC / Baez template and place it on “Paul McCartney”’s “girlfriend” Jane Asher. Her father, Richard Asher, was a top mind control, doctor who coined the term Munchausen syndrome.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Asher
He committed suicide, (or so we are told ;))
Then there Dr. Richard Asher’s buddy Dr. Emanual Miller. His info is here.
http://www.davidansley.com/family/showmedia.php?mediaID=232l
The strange case of Stu Sutcliff , his death, and Astrid Kircherr
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Sutcliffe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrid_Kirchherr
The connections are endless. We are being played at a sophisticated level. The replacements serve the Agenda, whether it is Olivia Newton John as Porne Aphrodite, Madonna as “Call to Chaos” girl or the Beatles as the Avatars of the Transformation, archetypes are manipulated before the Group Mind.
Here is “John Lennon” advancing one aspect of the Agenda, feminism, on the Dick Cavett Show 1972.
Another Lennon, another aspect of The Agenda. 1975 Note the double faced band members-Occult nose thumbing.
Fakeologists will have better luck convincing Hoi Polloi that people died on 911 than convincing me the same man is performing in the above videos.
I placed a picture of two Bob Dylans, Joan Baez’s cohort, below. Never mind the difference in hair, facial bones, chin and neck, riddle me this, Batman, what accounts for the difference between the warm, soulful eyes of the fellow on the left and the cold “I sold my soul to the devil” eyes of the character on the right?
I had trouble with the above links so here is a short version.
Real Joan 1965
The impostor. 1968
This second video below is obviously not the same woman in the first two, The face, voice…a different person.
@Tom, I posted the info here out of respect for Videre, who thought my remarks a distraction to hers.For future clarification, I did not say all of the actors playing Lennon wore silicon masks, only the fellow in the Snyder interview.
Simple nose prosthetics and wigs, including hairpieces, were used with other actors. BTW, like all media fakery, once you know what to look for, it becomes readily apparent.
Also, I am not an agent, simply a member of the forum, All My Loving
I recommend studying the picture of the real Beatles on the Welcome page. Detecting the differences in the doubles is an acquired skill, for me I had to study many pictures of the real Lads before I could begin to detect them easily. The problem is most people have never seen the real Beatles, only sets of clever doubles. The real Beatles disappeared circa 1964, not 1966 as Tina Foster is now asserting.
For example, the real John Lennon was a powerfully built man, with brawny shoulders and Alpha dog body language. Not the scrawny runt that appears in the Dick Cavett video.
The real John appears in this first video, an outtake from A Hard Days Night
Notice at :10 mark no mole on the left cheek.Now the double from A Hard Day’s Night.
Here the image is high quality while the real John is grainy.
@ the :16 sec mark. Note the mole on the left cheek that is not present in the first video.These are two different people. If you want proof, show any teenager who has never seen John Lennon. They have not been conditioned.
Here is the scrawny runt Lennon from Cavett.
The real Lennon and McCartney would not go along with the Agenda i.e. to systematically deconstruct the mores of Western society. Their music was transcendent, ethereal, sublime. Listen to “Your Gonna Lose That girl” or “The Night Before”.
The game being played against us is a spiritual one. The hustle is not about money, or power, but spirit.
“The world, with all of its pomp and props, is but the locale for a war for the soul which is the only reality.”
Michael A. Hoffman II
Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare.
Yes, I agree.
I am not convinced “Miles Mathis” is a real person. He may be a “Sim” a simulated entity. I think Miles is part of a counter intelligence operation aimed at the growing body of people who have discovered that many major events have been hoaxed. This really began with Sandy Hook although it can be traced further back. IMHO, the essay reads like classic disinfo-the first half is valid, with a couple of uncertain elements, but the second half about JFK and King is the phony part to discredit the subject.This pattern is duplicated in his essays on Manson Hoax and Lennon Hoax. In both of those essays, he begins with solid info only to step off the curb once the reader is hooked. For example, he says Sharon Tate is really Debbie Tate and provide spurious evidence. Also, with Lennon, he says the real Lennon is some character who only bears a passing resemblance. How someone who claims special knowledge of facial recognition because he is a portatrit painter and then make such an elementary error is inexplicable and tips his hand.
BTW, He is full of beans when he says he wrote this as a draft in 2007, ims
I like how you explain the real powers. I concur.
“You are but a witness to a profound mystery.”
Dr. Brugh Joy
Richard BenedictRead more: http://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/jfk-psyop/#ixzz3YKYZTbr3
You must be logged in to post a comment.