[1972skeptic]

I also have to say that I was always be Willder it in my subconscious even as a youth when I looked upon the Beatles and noticed they look different from year to year . I remember in my youth I looked at the 1965 version of the Beatles when they were on the help movie and they all look totally different . I have since delved into this subject with extreme curiosity and a open mind . I have done biometric research and have facial recognition apps along with my and my gift for spotting people that are doubles . It is easier than you think you just have to pay attention to their eyes and their mannerisms sometimes it is very hard . There are probably 4 to 5 people in your own state or county that resembles you uncannily . Couple that with voice training and mimicry and lots of money and you can get a thorough match at least enough to fool people .the rock band kiss, Edward Van Halen, David lee Roth, Metallica, Freddy mercury, al Pacino, even Pink Floyd for gods sake. After 1977 David gilmour is no longer “cute” and funny , he is chubbier with a much more serious persona. I don’t believe in “cloning” I think it is a hoax that the powers that be put out there to make you think they are more powerful than they are… they are not. But they love stealing original talent and changing it to what they want plus you can hire the doppelgängers to do the job for far less.look at “Paul Stanley ” from kiss.his teeth in the 1988 Swedish interview on YouTube shows a miniature gap between his teeth and this Paul was a far better singer and performer than the other two Paul’s from the 1970’s.this subject goes extremely deep and one can see it if you hone in your consciousness towards the eyes and the mannerisms.its about an agenda for a much bigger psychological operation.if you Believe the switch you will probably believe another monster psychological operation there making sure they are keeping you fooled and asleep so you will not be much trouble when they pull the big enchilada!

[1972skeptic]

I think it goes much deeper than anyone realizes. I’ve done extensive research on Elton and in my research he was replaced early on.he was already a product being pushed before his first album.record company buying billboards on buses saying” Elton john, Elton who?”…look closely at the 1971 age of Aquarius special and we see the Elton who had a lot of hair , not balding at all.also a different accent and speaking voice and mannerisms. And Bernie referring to him as “reg”.look at how he sings and his mouth.he structures words different and is not trying to promote any gay agenda or homosexuality.he also has a slightly heavier build .he talks “normal”. After “madman” I believe he was replaced with another guy who was balding.and he acts very withdrawn.by 1976-77 the shape of “elton’s” head is longer and the voice is a little deeper. In 1977 he throws hints about retiring and then on Jan 23,1978 people magazine has “the new Elton john!” On the front cover! This guy is a wide eyed almost bug eyed replacement.he lasted until 1988 and then we have the “Elton”we have now. Which looks nothing like the original. In my research the “original” may only got to sing on “lady Samantha ” and “your song”. There is only one black and white pic on google images of him in 1967 that is consistent with his childhood photo.they probably led him on and bought him out and kept Bernie.

[Author]

Posts