Podcast: Play in new window | Download
JOHN FRIEND’s interview of yours truly. – November 6, 2013
Don’t know about my radio skills – but at least I try to diffuse our research. John was certainly very supportive :
Yeah, I specifically said that I didn’t have a guest scheduled for MONDAY when I closed the interview with Simon, and I didn’t at the time. Ace Baker was and is scheduled for this coming TUESDAY, and he was scheduled for quite some time (at least a few days before I even confirmed with Simon). I will be interviewing Pat Shannan about his recent book on the JFK assassination detailing the case of the “two Oswalds” on Monday. BTW, I am starting to have very serious doubts about the JFK assassination… I already knew the Zapruder film was a fake,… Read more »
Oh so then you did know, when Simon was telling the story about Ace Baker, that he would be a guest the following week? Why not a even a mention of that? Why wouldn’t you just simply interject with a natural and simple “Really? Ace Baker? Hey Simon, I have him scheduled for next week, coincidently. I’ll be sure to ask him what he has to say about that”. That would be the proper honest attitude of someone with nothing to hide. To me it could be Ace Baker or Archie Bunker, it’s not about the guest, it’s about what… Read more »
if mr. friend is being forthright, it does seem like a propitious coincidence, at a minimum, that should have been mentioned to simon during the interview.
i would be interested in hearing a logical rationale for withholding the info. i’m having trouble coming up with one on my own.
I listened to that. In particular, i related to Simon’s frustration that this is still on-going… no resolution, no end in sight, Some out there seem to be making a career of this… Fetzer for one. It is as if their “job” is to keep us from getting to a resolution.
That’s how i separate the real from the memorex.
