How Stuntmen Are Set on Fire
12 Replies
i put pictures in the blog for thick fucks masons and ex jlb members billy lsp ,you say my name again i will embarrass you ,typo manchester is gods country https://fakeologist.com/forums2/viewtopic.php?t=573&start=2380 i suggest lsp should improve on this circle if he can ,remember your in a blog that was set up with 911 at the centre of it so ignoring the blog is not an option for you gullible apes ,the controlled opposition or masons i left running the discord in 2019 are a different matter,they have no choice but to insult ab daily ,their psilly ass pensions rely on… Read more »
some amateur ruing your audios ab ,find someone who can read before year 5 ill add to this , dave once i knew they were abel to ignore the blog and still maintain a fakeologist charade i decided to leave the discord and it’s year five soon the lads that are not fakeologist running the audios and ill say this again my spaceship against any of the clever apes,get your bibles ready ,and your masonic books and who runs america books cos i smashed all them too i fucking dare any of you rednecks to test the water i have… Read more »
Napoleon I have quite literally over the past decade put out videos with step by step instructions on how to see past the hoax and the LIE. Very few have taken the time to take that simple observation and use it in their so-called real life. Have they done that years ago, this whole fakeologist network would be so much farther ahead in their understanding of this in wet cell electromagnetic development. They choose to remain stage players they choose to remain those that constantly and only react to scripted events when they could stand before them and the lies… Read more »
I will speak from experience of being banned many times that no discord solves nothing. The reason being is the malcontent the know nothing is allowed the upper seat in the chamber while those with truth and work and test and observation to share are relegated to the outside. It is a vipers and snake pit and they know it. It serves the purpose of a mind trap. You will notice that few seeking the truth stay there long, one they figure it out quite quickly that they are nothing but time wasters spiritual homosexuals and just straight up idiots.… Read more »
Are self-immolations a thing?So many alleged phenomena – pandemics, suicide bombings, school mass shootings, self-immolations … are they things or are they all psyops?
PETRA LIVERANI
FEB 29, 2024
28
23
Share
Prompted by the mention of the alleged protest self-immolation by Vietnamese monk, Thích Qu?ng ??c, in 1963 in the comments on Is It “Inappropriate” To Ask Basic Questions About “Burning Man” Aaron Bushnell? by Celia Farber, I wondered if the 1963 self-immolation might reveal anomalies too.
Sure enough, things don’t add up, just as they don’t with Aaron’s seeming self-immolation. While I must admit that Aaron’s actual immolation is quite convincing but could be some kind of Deep Fake or done in the same way as shown in the stunt video above, there are a number of anomalies around the immolation as mentioned in Celia’s article.
See also article indicating that the January 2001 self-immolation by five people in Tiananmen Square was faked.
Questions about the 1963 self-immolation in Saigon
1. We are told that Malcolm Browne, a photographer working for Associated Press, took the photographs below displayed in Wikipedia. How credible is it that such an event – of which hint was given the day before – was able to be set up and allowed to proceed at a “busy Saigon intersection”? We might also ask that if the “important event” indicated were allowed to proceed, why not use film camera as well as still – after all, we got both for the impromptu “live” shooting of Lee Harvey Oswald a little later in the year. Note that the first photo below won World Press Photo of the Year, 1963.
When we crop the first photo so that the car appears at the same distance, Thích Qu?ng ??c is not in the same position in relation to the car, the people behind the car look different as do the people in the upper right quadrant and as Proton Magic points out in the comments, isn’t there an expectation of writhing? Whatever kind of mind control a monk has, wouldn’t his nervous system would be overwhelmed by the attack of flames? Do you think these seeming anomalies can be accommodated by the narrative or rather that they are against reality Revelation-of-the-Method (RoM) style, that is, they are trusty clues that tell us it’s all staged.To the left of the alleged self-immolation we see a white object that looks very different in both photos and in the second photo is significantly closer to the monk. Do you think that the second object reflects a petrol container deformed by the flames or rather that this is a RoM signal of fakery?If we crop the upper right quadrant in both photos we find that the monks in each don’t seem to match, for example, in the first photo we see no monk in a dark robe or a monk kneeling (extreme right) which we see in the second photo. Do you think this simply reflects natural movement of the monks during self-immolation or rather a RoM signal of fakery?In the right upper quadrant of the second photo we see what looks like a boy monk levitating although people have disputed this claim. Judge for yourself. Obviously, if you accept that that is what it looks like it can only mean one thing, right? RoM … and they do have a laugh with that one. If you don’t, I welcome alternative explanations.Part of Malcolm Browne’s bio in Wikipedia reads:
Browne worked for ABC TV for about a year but became dissatisfied with television journalism,[1] and worked freelance for several years. He did a year’s fellowship at Columbia University with the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1968, he joined The New York Times, becoming its correspondent for South America in 1972. Having worked as a chemist prior to becoming a journalist,[3] in 1977 Browne became a science writer, serving as a senior editor for Discover. He returned to the Times in 1985, and went on to cover the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
Do you think this biography may suggest he worked for intelligence?
EDIT: 21/04/24 We are told that Max Azzarello posted a 2,700-word manifesto to his Substack before setting himself on fire outside the courthouse where jurors were being chosen for the New York state criminal trial of former U.S. President Donald Trump on 19 April 2024, describing his intent to bring attention to a “totalitarian con” and writing that the U.S. government is “about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup.” Footage is unconvincing, in fact, it’s difficult to see what might be construed as a body in most of the footage.
Subscribe to Psyop detectiveBy Petra Liverani · Launched 2 years ago
Blowing away the magic propaganda dust layer by layer
copy paste workss better when i use others posts ,no spelling mistakes
unlike mine
This is great. I’ll add this to my post, https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/are-self-immolations-a-thing
Actually, I just had a little look at the recent one, Max Azzarello, which they don’t even show I don’t think in MSM but where they do show it just looks like flames, you can’t even see a body. Is there footage where you actually see a body? What a friggin joke. They just do not care at all … and why should they? People are just swallowing anything and everything at this point … or not.
Yes I also did a video on the subject of 19 or the metonic cycle which plays a role in this.
https://youtu.be/3VIZ0InpUvo?si=BVmjmRCqSDnhtveY
What you saw was a Hollywood production
nobody died and nobody got hurt noticed the age 37
(10)Io False input equals false output
777
21
3
Azzarello= 116 simple gematria ? (911)
Same as “demolition” “David koresh”
” Burning man “