Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hey Tal,
So much to say, so many words to type. Do you every go on teamspeak? I would love to meet you there anytime and speak with you. You can private message me in chatango and we can discuss the particulars if you wish.
K Ham
This is the Best video to listen to in order to learn about how the academic world has worked rather hard to dismiss Robert Bauval and The Orion Theory.
Egyptologist Robert Bauval on his Fight Against Mainstream Historians [FULL VIDEO] April 2015
K Ham
Anthony, do tell, who might these two be?
If you don’t want to say it public, you could private message me in the chat.K Ham
Imagery is clearly important to these hoaxers.
That is probably why this little old sand sculpture needed at least 5 layers before the media could release it.
K Ham
December 31, 2014.
In the Derailing Room I posted a new thread called the Psyopticon Event.In this thread I posted 10 links to Psyopticons most infamous 2 audios (Originals and clips):
January 8, 2015
Psyopticon posted on the David Icke forum:http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1062363450&postcount=73
Yes, Psyopticon, I am a Raucous Spookette, minus the Spook. Raucousette. Yes, I like it.
That word ‘Spook’, my friend, describes you.
I
am
sure
of
it.K Ham
Something happened to the link of “The Best of Psyopticon Gets Mad” posted previously.
Here is a link that works:
K Ham
THE BEST OF PSYOPTICON
In the following clip, I have edited out all the boring parts and just left the exciting parts. I tried my best not to alter the spirit of psyopticon’s rant.
The choice of curse words is what fascinates me the most.
K Ham
xileffilex,
Hahaha, you nailed Kenneth Williams. It stopped my breath when I saw that you so politely asked if he was psyopticon. Hilarious. Stopped ol’ Kenneth in his tracks.
😆
K Ham
xileffilex,
There are many important British hoaxes and psyop events worthy of discussion and investigation.
I apologize if it sounded like I was making light of British psyops. ALL psyops are important to our studies here.
Having spoke with psyopticon on several occasions, and having read several of his posts and chats, I saw that he was re-directing fakeologist discussion of current events to past British events which americans knew nothing about.
We americans had to rely on psyopticon as our guide, to provide us with the links and info, to walk us through each British event, and to hand us his conclusions.
Here is how a typical scenario would go with psyopticon:
An event would occur and smell of a hoax. Fakeologists would gather and start to investigate it, in comes psyopticon and the investigation would change immediate direction. Instead of looking into the this most recent event, psyopticon would lead the charge into investigating an older smaller British event. This would happen time and time again.
This is what I mean by
“and chatted incessantly about British minor news events”
Psyopticon did discuss important British events as well, but it seemed like he chose the minor events to discuss with us as he had the advantage in the discussion because he knew all the details and we did not.
In this way psyopticon was able to take control of many conversations he had with fakeologists.
In the beginning, he was obliged and people were happy to participate in his discussions, but it started to get tiresome. Being a polite group of people, fakeologists just kept obliging the psyopticon discussions. Looking back, it seems clear what he was doing: disrupting our discussion of current events.
K Ham
Concerning the giving of $$$ for this tsunami, there is an awesome little paper called
“Media Coverage and Charitable Giving After the 2004 Tsunami”.
Just like I hear Ab say over and over, “Humans are the most studied animal on earth.” This paper would support that.
There is a name for the relationship between your nightly news playing a story and the american people donating for that story. It is called “the CNN Effect”.
The authors of this paper claim the formula is very predictable.
Since we know the US media is basically government-controlled, is our government, through our media, pulling purposefully at our heart strings so that americans donate according to when the media suggests it?
K Ham
Here is one for you, and you don’t have to go to far: Russell Brand commenting on Russell Brand.
http://www.theguardian.com/culture/video/2014/dec/02/russell-brand-trews-rasputin-mode-video
K Ham
Videre,
To purposely insert chemtrails into advertising raises chemtrails to the status of media disinformation.
Could ‘chemtrails’ serve the same purpose as ‘skeletons’ in media images? Or do chemtrails, meaning long straight persistent clouds in the sky, have a different meaning altogether?
K Ham
I think this is a very interesting topic worthy of discussion.
The benefits of discussing lines of clouds in the sky is that we may start to define the phenomenon and learn more about media fakery.
At this point, paid opposition appears to be in control of the conversation, the same type of paid opposition that assists in media fakery, the moon hoax and doomsdayisms.
And just as chemtrails are not directly related to media fakery, neither is the moon hoax.
A cursory look at the graphic attached will show evidence of their existence. I, myself, have documented several hundred of them.
Why not take control of the conversation here and attempt to see the through the paid opposition veneer? We may discover some interesting connections.
K Ham
Flabbergasted, Can’t wait to chat with ya. You Clues guys are all so different. It’s fun to compare your writings with your emerging personalities.
K Ham
You must be logged in to post a comment.